Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of landscape composition and connectivity on the distribution of an endangered parrot in agricultural landscapes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extent and connectivity of individual habitat types strongly affects the distribution and abundance of organisms. However, little is known of how the level of connectivity and the interactions between different habitat types influences the distribution of species. Here, we used the geographically restricted and endangered regent parrot Polytelis anthopeplus monarchoides as a case study to examine the importance of composition and connectivity between different elements in 39 complex landscape mosaics (each 10 km radius). We compiled a database of 674 regent parrot nesting records, regional vegetation maps and measures of multipath connectivity between core vegetation types under different scenarios of resistance to movement provided by landscape elements. The occurrence of regent parrot nests was strongly affected by landscape composition, being positively related to the extent Eucalyptus camaldulensis riverine forest, but negatively related to the extent of semi-arid woodlands dominated by Eucalyptus largiflorens. Connectivity between E. camaldulensis forest (principal nesting habitat) and mallee (preferred feeding habitat) was a strong predictor of nest locations. Our study shows that the suitability of fragmented agricultural landscapes for supporting species can be greatly affected by connectivity and interactions between preferred and non-preferred habitats. For species that require complementary habitats such as the regent parrot, conservation management activities may be ineffective if they simply focus on a single core habitat type or the impacts of human land uses without regard to the interrelationships among landscape elements. While increasing the amount of primary preferred habitat should remain a cornerstone goal, increasing the extent and improving connectivity with alternative landscape elements also should be priority management objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts G, Fieberg J, Matthiopoulos J (2012) Comparative interpretation of count, presence–absence and point methods for species distribution models. Methods Ecol Evol 3(1):177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allouche O, Kalyuzhny M, Moreno-Rueda G, Pizarro M, Kadmon R (2012) Area—heterogeneity tradeoff and the diversity of ecological communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(43):17495–17500

  • Baker-Gabb D, Hurley V (2011) National recovery plan for the regent parrot (eastern subspecies) Polytelis anthopeplus monarchoides. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2012) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Accessed 3 April 2013

  • Bennett AF, Lumsden LF, Menkhorst PW (1989) Mammals of the mallee region of south-eastern Australia. In: Noble J, Bradstock R (eds) Mediterranean landscapes in Australia, mallee ecosystems and their management. CSIRO, Canberra, pp 191–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF, Radford JQ, Haslem A (2006) Properties of land mosaics: implications for nature conservation in agricultural environments. Biol Conserv 133(2):250–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Both C, Van Turnhout CAM, Bijlsma RG, Siepel H, Van Strien AJ, Foppen RPB (2010) Avian population consequences of climate change are most severe for long-distance migrants in seasonal habitats. Proc R Soc B 277(1685):1259–1266

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge A (1985) The regent parrot: a report on the breeding distribution and habitat requirements along the Murray River in south-eastern Australia. Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke MF, Avitabile SC, Brown L et al (2010) Ageing mallee eucalypt vegetation after fire: insights for successional trajectories in semi-arid mallee ecosystems. Aust J Bot 58(5):363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer W, Bondeau A, Woodward FI et al (2001) Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Glob Change Biol 7(4):357–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman ND, Bryan BA (2006) Systematic landscape restoration using integer programming. Biol Conserv 128(3):369–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallimer M, Skinner AMJ, Davies ZG, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ (2012) Multiple habitat associations: the role of offsite habitat in determining onsite avian density and species richness. Ecography 35(2):134–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992a) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65(1):169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992b) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Systems Resource Institute (2010) ArcMap 10.0. ESRI Inc., Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L et al (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14(2):101–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2006) Beyond fragmentation: the continuum model for fauna research and conservation in human-modified landscapes. Oikos 112(2):473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett ST, Crowley GM (2000) Regent parrot (eastern). The action plan for Australian birds. Environment Australia, Canberra, pp 314–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates JA (1996) The use of hollows by birds and mammals in dead river red gum and black box trees at Disher Creek, Murray River National Park, South Australia. S Aust Ornithol 32:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y (2002) A conceptiual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecol Appl 12(2):321–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrisson K, Pavlova A, Amos JN et al (2012) Fine-scale effects of habitat loss and fragmentation despite large-scale gene flow for some regionally declining woodland bird species. Landscape Ecol 27(6):813–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslem A, Callister KE, Avitabile SC et al (2010) A framework for mapping vegetation over broad spatial extents: A technique to aid land management across jurisdictional boundaries. Landsc Urban Plan 97(4):296–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslem A, Avitabile SC, Taylor RS et al (2012) Time-since-fire and inter-fire interval influence hollow availability for fauna in a fire-prone system. Biol Conserv 152:212–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heard GW, Black D, Robertson P (2004) Habitat use by the inland carpet python (Morelia spilota metcalfei: Pythonidae): Seasonal relationships with habitat structure and prey distribution in a rural landscape. Austral Ecol 29(4):446–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henle K, Davies KF, Kleyer M, Margules C, Settele J (2004) Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodivers Conserv 13(1):207–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins PJ (1999) Polytelis anthopeplus regent parrot. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds: parrots to dollarbird, vol 4. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp 295–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyal LA, McCollough M, Hunter ML (2001) Landscape ecology approaches to wetland species conservation: a case study of two turtle species in Southern Maine. Conserv Biol 15(6):1755–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith DA (2004) Ocean shores to desert dunes: the native vegetation of New South Wales and the ACT/David Keith. Dept. of Environment and Conservation NSW, Hurstville

    Google Scholar 

  • Land Conservation Council (1987) Vegetation. Report on the Mallee area review. Land Conservation Council, Melbourne, pp 104–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Law BS, Dickman CR (1998) The use of habitat mosaics by terrestrial vertebrate fauna: implications for conservation and management. Biodivers Conserv 7:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D, Hobbs RJ, Montague-Drake R et al (2008) A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecol Lett 11:78–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Spooner PG, Watson DM, Watson SJ, Saunders ME (2014) Interactions between almond plantations and native ecosystems: lessons learned from north-western Victoria. Ecol Manag Restor 15(1):4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally R, Cunningham SC, Baker PJ, Horner GJ, Thomson JR (2011) Dynamics of Murray–Darling floodplain forests under multiple stressors: the past, present, and future of an Australian icon. Water Resour Res 47(12):W00G05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRae BH, Shah VB (2011) Circuitscape user guide (Online). The University of California, Santa Barbara. http://www.circuitscape.org.  Accessed 3 April 2013

  • McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution and conservation. Ecology 89(10):2712–2724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4(2):133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2007) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford JQ, Bennett AF, Cheers GJ (2005) Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds. Biol Conserv 124(3):317–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V et al (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31(1):79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA et al (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes—eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87(3):661–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk AIJM, Beck HE, Crosbie RS et al (2013) The millennium drought in southeast Australia (2001–2009): natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society. Water Resour Res 49(2):1040-1057

  • Watson SJ, Luck GW, Spooner PG, Watson DM (2014) Land-use change: incorporating the frequency, sequence, time span, and magnitude of changes into ecological research. Front Ecol Environ 12(4):241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Kevin Smith, Rick Webster, David Leslie, Chris Belcher, Alex Holmes, Peter Robertson and Victor Hurley whose field research and reports provided data for the project. We acknowledge the regent parrot recovery team for support of the project. This research was funded through the New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) and an Australian Research Council linkage Grant (LP0883952). We particularly thank Peter Ewin and Damon Oliver from the NSW OEH for supporting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon J. Watson.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watson, S.J., Watson, D.M., Luck, G.W. et al. Effects of landscape composition and connectivity on the distribution of an endangered parrot in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol 29, 1249–1259 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0065-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0065-4

Keywords

Navigation