Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial heterogeneity of ambient sound at the habitat type level: ecological implications and applications

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While spatial heterogeneity is one the most studied ecological concepts, few or no studies have dealt with the subject of ambient sound heterogeneity from an ecological perspective. Similarly to ambient light conditions, which have been shown to play a significant role in ecological speciation, we investigated the existence of ambient sound heterogeneity and its possible relation to habitat structure and specifically to habitat types (as syntaxonomically defined ecological units). Considering that the structure and composition of animal communities are habitat type specific and that acoustic signals produced by animals may be shaped by the habitat’s vegetation structure, natural soundscapes are likely to be habitat specific. We recorded ambient sound in four forest and two grassland habitat types in Northern Greece. Using digital signal techniques and machine learning algorithms (self organizing maps, random forests), we concluded that ambient sound is not only spatially heterogeneous, but is also directly related to habitat type structure, pointing towards the existence of habitat type specific acoustic signatures. We provide evidence of the importance of soundscape heterogeneity and ambient sound signatures and a possible solution to the social cues versus vegetation characteristics debate in habitat selection theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen TFH (1998) The landscape “level” is dead: persuading the family to take it off the respirator. In: Peterson DL, Parker VT (eds) Ecological scale. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 35–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber JR, Burdett CL, Reed SE, Warner KA, Formichella C, Crooks KR, Theobald DM, Fristrup KM (2011) Anthropogenic noise exposure in protected natural areas: estimating the scale of ecological consequences. Landscape Ecol 26:1281–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts GB, Hadley AS, Rodenhouse N, Nocera JJ (2008) Social information trumps vegetation structure in breeding-site selection by a migrant songbird. Proc Biol Sci 275:2257–2263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boncoraglio G, Saino N (2007) Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Funct Ecol 21:134–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CG (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DS, Bonn A, Kunin WE, Cornell SJ (2010) Random forest characterization of upland vegetation and management burning from aerial imagery. J Biogeogr 37:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chon TS (2011) Self-organizing maps applied to ecological sciences. Ecol Inf 6:50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clobert J, Le Galliard JF, Cote J, Meylan S, Massot M (2009) Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Ecol Lett 12:197–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler DR, Edwards TC Jr, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler JJ (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Coensel B, Botteldooren D, De Muer T (2003) 1/f noise in rural and urban soundscapes. Acta Acust United Ac 89:287–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Depraetere M, Pavoine S, Jiguet F, Gasc A, Duvail S, Sueur J (2012) Monitoring animal diversity using acoustic indices: implementation in a temperate woodland. Ecol Indic 13:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drakou EG, Kallimanis AS, Mazaris AD, Apostolopoulou E, Pantis JD (2011) Habitat type richness associations with environmental variables: a case study in the Greek Natura 2000 aquatic ecosystems. Biodivers Conserv 20:929–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1993a) The color of light in forests and its implications. Ecol Monogr 63:2–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1993b) Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 340:215–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ey E, Fischer J (2009) The “acoustic adaptation hypothesis”: a review of the evidence from birds, anurans and mammals. Bioacoustics 19:21–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin JL (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14:101–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farina A, Lattanzi E, Malavasi R, Pieretti N, Piccioli L (2011a) Avian soundscapes and cognitive landscapes: theory, application and ecological perspectives. Landscape Ecol 26:1257–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina A, Pieretti N, Piccioli L (2011b) The soundscape methodology for long-term bird monitoring: a Mediterranean Europe case-study. Ecol Inf 6:354–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis CD, Paritsis J, Ortega CP, Cruz A (2011) Landscape patterns of avian habitat use and nest success are affected by chronic gas well compressor noise. Landscape Ecol 26:1269–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2001) The elements of statistical learning. Springer series in statistics. http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/ElemStatLearn. Accessed 11 Dec 2012

  • Goodale E, Beauchamp G, Magrath RD, Nieh JC, Ruxton GD (2010) Interspecific information transfer influences animal community structure. Tree 25:354–361

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn BA, Silverman ED (2006) Social cues facilitate habitat selection: American redstarts establish breeding territories in response to song. Biol Lett 2:337–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halley JM, Kunin WE (1999) Extinction risk and the 1/f family of noise models. Theor Popul Biol 56:215–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbers CM, Nagelkerken I, Lössbroek PAC, Schulten IE, Siegenthaler A, Holderied MW, Simpson SD (2012) A test of the senses: fish select novel habitats by responding to multiple cues. Ecology 93:46–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy EV, Holderied MW, Mair JM, Guzman HM, Simpson SD (2010) Spatial patterns in reef-generated noise relate to habitats and communities: evidence from a Panamanian case study. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 395:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschel ANG, Blumstein DT, Cohen RE, Buermann W, Smith TB, Slabbekoorn H (2009) Birdsong tuned to the environment: green hylia song varies with elevation, tree cover, and noise. Behav Ecol 20:1089–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen T (2001) Self-organizing maps. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kotliar NB, Wiens JA (1990) Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause B, Gage SH, Joo W (2011) Measuring and interpreting the temporal variability in the soundscape at four places in Sequoia National Park. Landscape Ecol 26:1247–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by random forest. R News 2:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Maan ME, Seehausen O (2011) Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. Ecol Lett 14:591–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, MacArthur JW, Preer J (1962) On bird species diversity. II. Prediction of bird census from habitat measurements. Am Nat 96:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsinos YG, Mazaris AD, Papadimitriou KD, Mniestris A, Hatzigiannidis G, Maioglou D, Pantis JD (2008) Spatiotemporal variability in human and natural sounds in a rural landscape. Landscape Ecol 23:945–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazaris AD, Kallimanis AS, Chatzigianidis G, Papadimitriou K, Pantis JD (2009) Spatiotemporal analysis of an acoustic environment: interactions between landscape features and sounds. Landscape Ecol 24:817–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melles SJ, Badzinski D, Fortin MJ, Csillag F, Lindsay K (2009) Disentangling habitat and social drivers of nesting patterns in songbirds. Landscape Ecol 24:519–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovic D, Zeppelzauer M, Breiteneder C (2010) Features for content-based audio retrieval. Adv Comput 78:71–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mönkkönen M, Helle P, Soppela K (1990) Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines of resident tits (Parus spp.): heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communities. Oecologia 85:218–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 109:17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls JA, Goldizen AW (2006) Habitat type and density influence vocal signal design in satin bowerbirds. J Anim Ecol 75:549–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olden JD, Lawler JJ, Poff NLR (2008) Machine learning methods without tears: a primer for ecologists. Q Rev Biol 83:171–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters G, Peters MK (2010) Long-distance call evolution in the Felidae: effects of body weight, habitat, and phylogeny. Biol J Linn Soc 101:487–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowski BC, Farina A, Gage SH, Dumyahn SL, Krause BL (2011a) What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landscape Ecol 26:1213–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowski BC, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Dumyahn SL, Farina A, Krause BL, Napoletano BM, Gage SH, Pieretti N (2011b) Soundscape ecology: the science of sound in the landscape. BioScience 61:203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford CA, Stanley JA, Tindle CT, Montgomery JC, Jeffs AG (2010) Localised coastal habitats have distinct underwater sound signatures. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 401:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford CA, Stanley JA, Simpson SD, Jeffs AG (2011) Juvenile coral reef fish use sound to locate habitats. Coral Reefs 30:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2.10.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org

  • Ryan MJ (1988) Constraints and patterns in the evolution of anuran acoustic communication. In: Fritzch B, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W, Hetherington T, Walkowiad W (eds) The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. Wiley, New York, pp 637–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Šálek M, Svobodová J, Zasadil P (2010) Edge effect of low-traffic forest roads on bird communities in secondary production forests in central Europe. Landscape Ecol 25:1113–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seehausen O, Terai Y, Magalhaes IS, Carleton KL, Mrosso HDJ, Miyagi R, van der Sluijs I, Schneider MV, Maan ME, Tachida H, Imai H, Okada N (2008) Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 455:620–626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson SD, Radford AN, Tickle EJ, Meekan MG, Jeffs AG (2011) Adaptive avoidance of reef noise. PLoS One 6:e16625

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H (2004a) Habitat-dependent ambient noise: consistent spectral profiles in two African forest types. J Acoust Soc Am 116:3727–3733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H (2004b) Singing in the wild: the ecology of birdsong. In: Marler P, Slabbekoorn H (eds) Nature’s music: the science of birdsong. Elsevier Academic Press, London, pp 178–205

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley JA, Radford CA, Jeffs AG (2012) Location, location, location: finding a suitable home among the noise. Proc Biol Sci 279:3622–3631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur J, Aubin T, Simonis C (2008a) Equipment review Seewave, a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics 18:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur J, Pavoine S, Hamerlynck O, Duvail S (2008b) Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. PLoS One 3:e4065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Mathworks Inc (2009) MATLAB v. R2009b Documentation. The Mathworks Inc

  • Tobias JA, Aben J, Brumfield RT, Derryberry EP, Halfwerk W, Slabbekoorn H, Seddon N (2010) Song divergence by sensory drive in Amazonian birds. Evolution 64:2820–2839

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trefry SA, Hik DS (2010) Variation in pika (Ochotona collaris, O. princeps) vocalizations within and between populations. Ecography 33:784–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truax B, Barrett GW (2011) Soundscape in a context of landscape and acoustic ecology. Landscape Ecol 26:1201–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG (2005) Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:319–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban DL, O’Neil RV, Shugart HH Jr (1987) Landscape ecology: a hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns. BioScience 37:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij MJA, Marhaver KL, Huijbers CM, Nagelkerken I, Simpson SD (2010) Coral larvae move toward reef sounds. PLoS One 5:e10660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RH, Danchin É (2010) A taxonomy of biological information. Oikos 119:203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Okin GS, D’Odorico P, Caylor KK, Macko SA (2012) Ecosystem-scale spatial heterogeneity of stable isotopes of soil nitrogen in African savannas. Landscape Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9776-6

  • Waser PM, Brown CH (1986) Habitat acoustics and primate communication. Am J Primatol 10:135–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehrens R, Buydens LMC (2007) Self-and super-organizing maps in R: the Kohonen package. J Stat Softw 21:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2008) Allerton Park 1983: the beginnings of a paradigm for landscape ecology? Landscape Ecol 23:125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA, Stenseth CN, Van Horne B, Ims RA (1993) Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66:369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landscape Ecol 19:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yovel Y, Franz MO, Stilz P, Schnitzler HU (2008) Plant classification from bat-like echolocation signals. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the input from Dr. EG Drakou, Dr. AD Mazaris and Dr. I Tsiripidis and Dr. J Tzanopoulos. DB would like to thank E Mandravelli, A Stamellou, V Tsiogka, S Theodoridis and Prof. T Lanaras for input in earlier versions of the paper. This work was partially supported by the Postgraduate Studies Programme “Conservation of Biodiversity and Sustainable Exploitation of Native Plants” at the Biology Department of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios Bormpoudakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bormpoudakis, D., Sueur, J. & Pantis, J.D. Spatial heterogeneity of ambient sound at the habitat type level: ecological implications and applications. Landscape Ecol 28, 495–506 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9849-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9849-1

Keywords

Navigation