Date: 23 Mar 2011
Assessment and Management of Risk for Intimate Partner Violence by Police Officers Using the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a crime that is present in all countries, seriously impacts victims, and demands a great deal of time and resources from the criminal justice system. The current study examined the use of the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide, 2nd ed. (SARA; Kropp, Hart, Webster, & Eaves, 1995), a structured professional judgment risk assessment and management tool for IPV, by police officers in Sweden over a follow-up of 18 months. SARA risk assessments had significant predictive validity with respect to risk management recommendations made by police, as well as with recidivism as indexed by subsequent contacts with police. Risk management mediated the association between risk assessment and recidivism: High levels of intervention were associated with decreased recidivism in high risk cases, but with increased recidivism in low risk cases. The findings support the potential utility of police-based risk assessment and management of IPV, and in particular the belief that appropriately structured risk assessment and management decisions can prevent violence.
During preparation of the final version of this manuscript, the authors learned of the passing of Don Andrews, some of whose publications are cited herein. We would like to dedicate this paper to Don in recognition of his contributions to the field of offender assessment and treatment.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
Aroian, L. A. (1944/1947). The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 265–271. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730442.
Baldry, A. C., & Winkel, F. W. (Eds.). (2007). Intimate partner violence prevention and intervention: The risk assessment and management approach. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Belfrage, H. (2008). Police-based structured spousal violence risk assessment: The process of developing a police version of the SARA. In A. C. Baldry & F. W. Winkel (Eds.), Intimate partner violence prevention and intervention: The risk assessment and management approach (pp. 33–44). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
Belfrage, H., & Strand, S. (2008). Structured spousal violence risk assessment: Combining risk factors and victim vulnerability factors. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7, 39–46.CrossRef
Campbell, J. C. (1995). Prediction of homicide by battered women. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.), Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers (pp. 96–113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Clark, J., & DuMont, J. (2003). Intimate partner violence and health: A critique of Canadian prevalence studies. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 94, 52–58.
Goodman, L. A. (1960). On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55, 708–713.CrossRef
Hart, S. D. (1998). The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence: Conceptual and methodological issues. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 121–137.
Hart, S. D. (2001). Assessing and managing violence risk. In K. S. Douglas, C. D. Webster, S. D. Hart, D. Eaves, & J. R. P. Ogloff (Eds.), HCR-20 violence risk management companion guide (pp. 13–25). Burnaby, BC: Mental Health Law & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
Heise, L., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2002). Violence by intimate partners. In E. G. Krug, L. L. Dahlberg, J. A. Mercy, A. B. Zwi, & R. Lozano (Eds.), World report on violence and health (pp. 87–121). Geneva: World Health Organization.
Hilton, Z. H., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2010). Risk assessment for domestically violent men: Tools for criminal justice offender intervention, and victim services. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Hilton, Z. H., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Lang, C. L., Cormier, C. A., & Lines, K. J. (2004). A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario domestic assault risk assessment. Psychological Assessment, 16, 267–275. doi:10.1037/1040-35188.8.131.527.PubMedCrossRef
Kropp, P. R., & Gibas, A. (2010). The spousal assualt risk assessment guide (SARA). In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 227–250). New York: Routledge.
Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., & Belfrage, H. (2004). Bedömning av risk för upprepat partnervåld (SARA:SV): Användarmanual. Sundsvall, Sweden: Rättspsykiatriska regionkliniken, Landstinget Västernorrland.
Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., & Belfrage, H. (2005). Brief spousal assault form for the evaluation of risk (B-SAFER): User manual. Vancouver, Canada: Proactive Resolutions Inc.
Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., & Belfrage, H. (2008). Bedömning av risk för upprepat partnervåld (SARA:SV) Version 2: Användarmanual. Sundsvall, Sweden: Rättspsykiatriska regionkliniken, Landstinget Västernorrland.
Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., & Belfrage, H. (2010). Brief spousal assault form for the evaluation of risk (B-SAFER), Version 2: User manual. Vancouver, Canada: Proactive Resolutions Inc.
Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1994). Manual for the spousal assault risk assessment guide. Vancouver, BC: British Columbia Institute on Family Violence.
Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1995). Manual for the spousal assault risk assessment guide (2nd ed.). Vancouver, BC: British Columbia Institute on Family Violence.
Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1999). Spousal assault risk assessment guide (SARA). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.CrossRef
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Storey, J. E., & Hart, S. D. (in press). How do police respond to stalking? An examination of the risk management strategies and tactics used in a specialized anti-stalking law enforcement unit. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. doi:10.1007/s11896-010-9081-8.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence and consequences of violence against women (Rep. No. NCJ 183781). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Tolman, R. M., & Rosen, D. (2001). Domestic violence in the lives of women receiving welfare. Violence Against Women, 7, 141–158. doi:10.1177/10778010122182361.
- Assessment and Management of Risk for Intimate Partner Violence by Police Officers Using the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide
Law and Human Behavior
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Intimate partner violence
- Risk assessment
- Risk management
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Health Sciences, Section for Criminology, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
- 3. Forensic Psychiatric Centre, Sundsvall, Sweden
- 2. Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
- 4. British Columbia Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- 5. Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway