Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Retributive and Restorative Justice

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

The emergence of restorative justice as an alternative model to Western, court-based criminal justice may have important implications for the psychology of justice. It is proposed that two different notions of justice affect responses to rule-breaking: restorative and retributive justice. Retributive justice essentially refers to the repair of justice through unilateral imposition of punishment, whereas restorative justice means the repair of justice through reaffirming a shared value-consensus in a bilateral process. Among the symbolic implications of transgressions, concerns about status and power are primarily related to retributive justice and concerns about shared values are primarily related to restorative justice. At the core of these processes, however, lies the parties’ construal of their identity relation, specifically whether or not respondents perceive to share an identity with the offender. The specific case of intergroup transgressions is discussed, as are implications for future research on restoring a sense of justice after rule-breaking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, F., & Staub, H. (1956). The criminal, the judge, and the public. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies or freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., & Campbell, W. (2000). Self-esteem, narcissism, and aggression: Does violence result from low self-esteem or from threatened egotism? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 26–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazemore, G. (1998). Restorative justice and earned redemption: Communities, victims, and offender reintegration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 768–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. (2001). A comparison of four restorative conferencing models. In U. S. Department of Justice Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (Ed.), OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin (Vol. February 2001). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

  • Beven, J. P., Hall, G., Froyland, I., Steels, B., & Goulding, D. (2005). Restoration or renovation? Evaluating restorative justice outcomes. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 194–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: “getting even” and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 246–260). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1998). Restorative justice. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 323–344). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1999). Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 25, pp. 1–127). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2003). Principles of restorative justice. In A. von Hirsch, J. V. Roberts, A. Bottoms, K. Roach & M. Schiff (Eds.), Restorative justice and criminal justice: Competing or reconcilable paradigms? (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., & Strang, H. (2001). Introduction: Restorative justice and civil society. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society (pp. 1–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V. (1998). The value orientations underlying liberalism-conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 575–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V. (2000). Values and restorative justice in schools. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice: Philosophy to practice (pp. 121–144). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 543–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 284–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. S., Perkowitz, W. T., Lurigio, A. J., & Weaver, F. M. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 107–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology, 17, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Ambrose, M. L. (2001). Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 119–151). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. (2002). Just punishments: Research on retributional justice. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 314–333). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., Carlsmith, K. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2000). Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 659–683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Keijser, J. W., van der Leeden, R., & Jackson, J. L. (2002). From moral theory to penal attitudes and back: A theoretically integrated modeling approach. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(4), 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, communication, and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society (trans: Simpson, G.). Glencoe: Free Press. (Original work published 1902).

  • Eaton, J., Struthers, C., & Santelli, A. G. (2006). The mediating role of perceptual validation in the repentance-forgiveness process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1389–1401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., Campbell, W., & Finkel, E. J. (2004). Too proud to let go: Narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 894–912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1996). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1998). Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2002). Reactions to supporters and opponents of uranium mining in relation to status, attitude similarity, and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1464–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2006). Deservingness and emotion: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 38–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frantz, C. M., & Bennigson, C. (2005). Better late than early: The influence of timing on apology effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, M. (2004). Do normative transgressions affect punitive judgments? An empirical test of the psychoanalytic scapegoat hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1650–1660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Govier, T. (2002). Forgiveness and revenge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Weiner, B., & Zucker, G. S. (1997). An attributional analysis of punishment goals and public reactions to O. J. Simpson Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. (2006). Restoration and retribution: How including retributive components affects the acceptability of restorative justice processes. Social Justice Research, 19, 395–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A., McGarty, C., & Turner, J. C. (1996). Salient group memberships and persuasion: The role of social identity in the validation of beliefs. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 29–56). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 125–144). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 1–52). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (1998). Restorative justice: The challenge of sexual and racial violence. Journal of Law and Society, 25, 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo, Y. J. (2003). Procedural justice and social regulation across group boundaries: Does subgroup identity undermine relationship-based governance? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 336–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordiante identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem, is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, D. M. (1998). Social meaning and the economic analysis of crime. Journal of Legal Studies, 27, 609–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. L., Hymes, R. W., Anderson, A. B., & Weathers, J. E. (1995). Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 545–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2005). Justice and desert-based emotions. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. Prison Journal, 85, 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1991). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement. In R. Vermunt & H. Steensma (Eds.), Social justice in human relations (Vol. 1, pp. 13–32). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (1994). The ‘black sheep effect’: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. F. (1999). Restorative justice: An overview. A report by the Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate. London: Home Office.

  • McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFatter, R. M. (1978). Sentencing strategies and justice: Effects of punishment philosophy on sentencing decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1490–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFatter, R. M. (1982). Purposes of punishment: Effects of utilities of criminal sanctions on perceived appropriateness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 255–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., & Haslam, M. A. (1993). The creation of uncertainty in the influence process: The roles of stimulus information and disagreement with similar others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, B. P., & Hinsz, V. B. (2004). A comparison of human aggression committed by groups and individuals: An interindividual-intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 551–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (2003). Testing an attribution-of-blame model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 793–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G., Scherer, K., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1993). Aggression: Interaction between individuals and social groups. In R. B. Felson & J. T. Tedeschi (Eds.), Aggression and violence: Social interactionist perspectives (pp. 145–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. G., & Hampton, J. (1988). Forgiveness and mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murugesan, V., & Sears, D. (2006, January). The effect of humiliation on acceptance for retaliatory aggression. Poster presented at the 7th annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Palm Springs, CA.

  • Myers, D. G. (2005). Social psychology (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honour: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Outcomes as affirmation of membership value: Monetary compensation as an administrative response to procedural injustice: Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Okimoto, T. G., & Tyler, T. R. (2007). Is compensation enough? Relational concerns in responding to unintended harm. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 399–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U. (2003). Punishment goals of crime victims. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 173–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlich, G. (2001). The force of community. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society (pp. 56–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peachey, D. E. (1989). The Kitchener experiment. In M. Wright & B. Galaway (Eds.), Mediation and criminal justice (pp. 14–26). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Retzinger, S. M., & Scheff, T. J. (1996). Strategy for community conferences: Emotions and social bonds. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Restorative justice: International perspectives (pp. 315–336). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, K. J., & Platow, M. J. (2003). On the social psychology of power and powerlessness: Social power as a symptom of organizational division. In S. A. Haslam, D. Van Knippenberg, M. Platow & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 173–188). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. V., & Stalans, L. J. (2004). Restorative sentencing: Exploring the views of the public. Social Justice Research, 17, 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, D. (2003). Accountability in restorative justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, D. (2006). Dimensions of restorative justice. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, D. A., Steel, J. A., Woodell, A. J., & Bembenek, A. F. (2003). Justice within social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 374–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Angel, C., Woods, D., Barnes, G. C., Bennett, S., & Inkpen, N. (2005). Effects of face-to-face restorative justice on victims of crime in four randomized, controlled trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 367–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2000). Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1367–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, H. (2002). Repair or revenge: Victims and restorative justice. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, H., Sherman, L., Angel, C. M., Woods, D. J., Bennett, S., Newbury-Birch, D., & Inkpen, N. (2006). Victim evaluations of face-to-face restorative justice experiences: A quasi-experimental analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 281–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, H., Sherman, L., & Mayo-Wilson, E. (2005). Restorative justice: The effects of face-to-face conferencing following personal victim crimes (A Systematic Review for the Campbell Collaboration). Manuscript in preparation.

  • Sunshine, J., & Heuer, L. (2002). Deservingness and perceptions of procedural justice in citizen encounters with the police. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 397–415). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1981). The experimental social psychology of intergroup behaviour. In J. C. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 66–101). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 42–67). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations, and leadership. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 25–65). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. G. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4 ed., Vol. 2, pp. 595–629). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1999). Justice, social identity, and group processes. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 223–264). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Prooijen, J.-W. (2004, June/July). Retributive versus restorative justice: Is punishing offenders more important than compensating victims. Paper presented at the 10th biennial meeting of the International Society for Justice Research, Regina, Canada.

  • Vidmar, N. (2000). Retribution and revenge. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 31–63). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidmar, N. (2002). Retributive justice: Its social context. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 291–313). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidmar, N., & Miller, D. T. (1980). Socialpsychological processes underlying attitudes toward legal punishment. Law and Society Review, 14, 565–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hirsch, A. (1993). Censure and sanctions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, L. (1995). Restorative justice for juveniles: Just a technique or a fully fledged alternative? The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 228–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M. (2002). What is social about justice? Inclusive identity and group values as the basis of the justice motive. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M. (2004). A social categorisation approach to distributive justice. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 219–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., Weber, U., & Waldzus, S. (2003). The ingroup as pars pro toto: Projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 461–473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M., & Thielmann, I. (2006). Why we punish in the name of justice: Just desert versus value restoration and the role of social identity. Social Justice Research, 19, 450–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, H. (1985). Retributive justice, restorative justice. New Perspectives on Crime and Justice, vol. 4: Occasional papers of the MCC Canada Victim Offender Ministries Program and the MCC, U.S. Office of Criminal Justice. Elkhart, Ind.: Mennonite Central Committee; Kitchener, Ontario: Canada Victim Offender Ministries Program.

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by a grant from the Australian Research Council (DP0557634).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia

    Michael Wenzel, Tyler G. Okimoto & Norman T. Feather

  2. School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia

    Michael J. Platow

Authors
  1. Michael Wenzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tyler G. Okimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Norman T. Feather
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael J. Platow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Wenzel.

About this article

Cite this article

Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T.G., Feather, N.T. et al. Retributive and Restorative Justice. Law Hum Behav 32, 375–389 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9116-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9116-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation