Deception Detection Expertise
First Online: 10 August 2007 Received: 15 January 2007 Accepted: 18 July 2007 DOI:
10.1007/s10979-007-9110-z Cite this article as: Bond, G.D. Law Hum Behav (2008) 32: 339. doi:10.1007/s10979-007-9110-z Abstract
A lively debate between Bond and Uysal (
, 2007 Law and Human Behavior, 31, 109–115) and O’Sullivan ( , 2007 Law and Human Behavior, 31, 117–123) concerns whether there are experts in deception detection. Two experiments sought to (a) identify expert(s) in detection and assess them twice with four tests, and (b) study their detection behavior using eye tracking. Paroled felons produced videotaped statements that were presented to students and law enforcement personnel. Two experts were identified, both female Native American BIA correctional officers. Experts were over 80% accurate in the first assessment, and scored at 90% accuracy in the second assessment. In Signal Detection analyses, experts showed high discrimination, and did not evidence biased responding. They exploited nonverbal cues to make fast, accurate decisions. These highly-accurate individuals can be characterized as experts in deception detection. Keywords Dynamic eye tracking Deception detection Nonverbal cues Expertise Novices Cues References
Abernathy, B. (1990). Expertise, visual search, and information pick-up in squash.
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10
Bond, G. D., & Lee, A. Y. (2005). Language of lies in prison: Linguistic classification of prisoners’ truthful and deceptive natural language.
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19
Bond, G. D., Malloy, D. M., Arias, E. A., Nunn, S. N., & Thompson, L. A. (2005). Lie-biased decision making in prison.
Communication Reports, 18
Bond, C. F., & Uysal, A. (2007). On lie detection “wizards”.
Law and Human Behavior, 31
CBS News. (Producer). (1997).
Stalkers: Against the law [Television broadcast]. (Available from CBS News, 524 W. 57th Street, New York, NY 10019).
Charness, N., Reingold, E. M, Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D. M. (2001). The perceptual aspect of skilled performance in chess: Evidence from eye movements.
Memory and Cognition, 29, 1146–1152.
DePaulo, B. M., & Pfeiffer, R. L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16
DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Telling lies.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37
DePaulo, B. M., Rosenthal, R., Rosenkrantz, J., & Green, C. (1982). Actual and perceived cues to deception: A closer look at speech.
Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3
Ekman, P. (1985).
Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, marriage, and politics. New York: W. W. Norton.
Ekman, P. (1992).
Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, marriage, and politics (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29
Ekman, P., & O’Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar?
American Psychologist, 46
Ekman, P., O’Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. (1999). A few can catch a liar.
Psychological Science, 10
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data.
Psychological Review, 87
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993).
Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Frank, M. G., & Ekman, P. (1997). The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high stake lies.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966).
Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Oxford: Wiley.
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003).
The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester: Wiley.
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Vrij, A. (2005). Police interrogation from a social psychology perspective.
Policing and Society, 15
Kasl, S. V., & Mahl, G. F. (1965). The relationship of disturbances and hesitations in spontaneous speech to anxiety.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1
Kassin, S. M., & Fong, C. T. (1999). “I’m innocent!”: Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room.
Law and Human Behavior, 23
Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception.
Law and Human Behavior, 26
O’Sullivan, M. (2007). Unicorns or Tiger Woods: Are lie detection experts myths or realities? A response to
On Lie Detection Wizards
by Bond and Uysal.
Law and Human Behavior, 31
O’Sullivan, M., & Ekman, P. (2004). The wizards of deception detection. In P. A. Granhag & L. Strömwell (Eds.),
The detection of deception in forensic contexts. London: Cambridge University Press.
Park, H. S., & Levine, T. R. (2001). A probability model of accuracy in deception detection experiments.
Communication Monographs, 68
Strömwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2004).
The detection of deception in forensic contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., Eigsti, I. M., Yano, S., & Munhall, K. G. (1998). Eye movement of perceivers during audiovisual speech perception.
Perception and Psychophysics, 60
Vrij, A. (2004). Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve.
Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9
Vrij, A., Evans, H., Akehurst, L., & Mann, S. (2004). Rapid judgments in assessing verbal and nonverbal cues: Their potential for deception researchers and lie detection.
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16
Vrij, A., Mann, S., Robbins, E., & Robinson, M. (2006). Police officers ability to detect deception in high stakes situations and in repeated lie detection tests.
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20
Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., Colella, M. J., & Alton, A. O. (1984). Anchoring in the detection of deception and leakage.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47
CrossRef Copyright information
© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007