Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., & Camerer, C. (1995). Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. The American Economic Review, 85, 1337–1343.
Barnes, S., Jennings, K., Inglehart, R., & Farah, B. (1988). Party identification and party closeness in comparative perspective. Political Behavior, 10
Baum, L. (1998). The puzzle of judicial behavior (analytical perspectives on politics). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bork, R. (1990). The tempting of America: The political seduction of the law. New York: Free Press.
Bower, A., & Burkett, G. (1987). Family physicians and generic drugs: A study of recognition, information sources, prescribing attitudes, and practice. Journal of Family Practice, 24
Braman, E. (2006). Reasoning on the threshold: Testing the separability of preferences in legal decision making. The Journal of Politics, 68
Braman, E., & Nelson, T. (2007). Mechanism of motivated reasoning? Analogical perception in discrimination disputes. Working Paper. Department of Political Science, University of Indiana (in press).
Buchman, T., Tetlock, P., & Reed, R. (1996). Accountability and auditors’ judgment about contingent events. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23
Burton, S. (1992). Judging in good faith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cardozo, B. (1949). The nature of the judicial process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Caudill, S., Johnson, M., Rich, E., & McKinney, P. (1996). Physicians, pharmaceutical sales representatives, and the cost of prescribing. Archives of Family Medicine, 5
Cross, F. (1997). Political science and the new legal realism. Northwestern University Law Review, 92, 251–326.
Cuccia, A., Hackenbrack, K., & Nelson, M. (1995). The ability of professional standards to mitigate aggressive reporting. The Accounting Review, 70, 227–248.
Dana, J., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290
Davies, M. (1997). Positive test strategies and confirmatory retrieval processes in the evaluation of personality feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73
Dawson, E., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. (2002). Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28
Ditto, P., & Lopez, D. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63
Ditto, P., Scepansky, J., Munro, G., Apanovitch, A. M., & Lockhart, L. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.
Dworkin, R. (1996). Freedom’s law: The moral reading of the American constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Frank, J. (1970). Law and the modern mind. Gloucester, Mass: Peter Smith.
Furgeson, J., Babcock, L., & Shane, P. (2007). Behind the mask of method: Political orientation and constitutional interpretive preferences. Under review.
Hamilton, A. (1788, June 14). Federalist no. 78. Independent Journal.
Hsee, C. (1996). Elastic justification: How unjustifiable factors influence judgments. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66
Jain, S. P., & Maheswaran, D. (2000). Motivated reasoning: A depth-of-processing perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 26
Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis-testing. Psychological Review, 94
Klein, W., & Kunda, Z. (1993). Maintaining self-serving social comparisons: Biased reconstruction of one’s past behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19
Knight, K. (1999). Liberalism and conservatism. In J. Robinson, P. Shaver, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes (pp. 59–148). New York: Academic Press.
Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108
Lundgren, S., & Prislin, R. (1998). Motivated cognitive processing and attitude change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24
McDonald, H., & Hirt, E. (1997). When expectancy meets desire: Motivation effects in reconstructive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72
Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84
Pinello, D. (2001). Linking party to judicial ideology in American courts: A meta-Analysis. Justice System Journal, 20, 219–254.
Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1987). Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20
Redding, R., & Reppucci, D. (1999). Effects of lawyers’ socio-political attitudes on their judgments of social science in legal decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 23
Rehnquist, W. (1976). The notion of a living constitution. University of Texas Law Review, 54, 693–706.
Runyon, R. P., & Haber, A. (1988). Fundamentals of behavioral statistics. New York: Random House.
Sanitoso, R., Kunda, Z., & Fong, G. (1990). Motivated recruitment of autobiographical memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59
Scalia, A. (1997). A matter of interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Schubert, G. (1965). The judicial mind; the attitudes and ideologies of Supreme Court justices, 1946–1963. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Segal, J., & Spaeth, H. (1994). The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model: The authors respond. Law and Courts, 4, 10–11.
Segal, J., & Spaeth, H. (1999). Majority rule or minority will: Adherence to precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, J., & Spaeth, H. (2002). The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shapiro, S., & Levy, R. (1995). Judicial incentives and indeterminacy in substantive review of administrative decisions. Duke Law Journal, 44
Simon, D., Pham, L., Le, Q., & Holyoak, K. (2001). The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27
Sisk, G., & Heise, M. (2005). Judges and ideology: Public and academic debates about statistical measures. Northwestern University Law Review, 99, 743–803.
Wegener, D., Kerr, N., Fleming, M., & Petty, R. (2000). Flexible correction of juror judgments: Implications for jury instructions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6
Wistrich, A., Guthrie, C., & Rachlinski, J. (2005). Can judges ignore inadmissible information? The difficulty of deliberately disregarding. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 153