Amenta, A. E., Guy, L. S., & Edens, J. F. (2003). Sex offender risk assessment: A cautionary note regarding measures attempting to quantify violence risk. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 3
Bamber, D. (1975). The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12
Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Langton, C. M., & Peacock, E. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28
Bartosh, D. L., Garby, T., Lewis, D., & Gray, S. (2003). Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47
Campbell, T. W. (2000). Sexual predator evaluations and phrenology: Considering issues of evidentiary reliability. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18
Campbell, T. W. (2003). Sex offenders and actuarial risk assessments: Ethical considerations. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21
Epperson, D. L., Kaul, J. D., Huot, S. J., Hesselton, D., Alexander, W., & Goldman, R. (2000, November). Cross-validation of the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool—Revised (MnSOST—R).
Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Diego, CA. Retrieved March 30, 2006 from http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/faculty/epperson/atsa2000/sld001.htm
Epperson, D. L., Kaul, J. D., Huot, S., Goldman, R., & Alexander, W. (2003). Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool—Revised (MnSOST—R) technical paper: Development, validation, and recommended risk level cut scores
. Retrieved November 18, 2006 from Iowa State University Department of Psychology web site: http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/∼dle/mnsost_download.htm
Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 702, Pub. L. No. 93-595, §1, 88 Stat. 1937 (1975).
Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 403, Pub. L. No. 93-595, §1, 88 Stat. 1932 (1975).
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Hallberg, A. M., Lebow, B., Snitz, E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1983a). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29–36.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1983b). A method for comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology, 148
Hanson, R. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. (User report 1997–04.). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. (User report 2004–02.). Ottawa: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders. (User report 1999–02.). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
Janus, E. S. (2000). Sex predator commitment laws: Constitutional but unwise. Psychiatric Annals, 30, 411–420.
Janus, E. S., & Meehl, P. E. (1997). Assessing the legal standard for predictions of dangerousness in sex offender commitment proceedings. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 3
Janus, E. S., & Prentky, R. A. (2003). Forensic use of actuarial risk assessment with sex offenders: Accuracy, admissibility and accountability. American Criminal Law Review, 40, 1443–1499.
Kansas v. Hendricks (1997). 117 S. Ct. 2072.
Langton, C. M. (2003). Contrasting approaches to risk assessment with adult male sexual offenders: An evaluation of recidivism prediction schemes and the utility of supplementary clinical information for enhancing predictive accuracy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International. 64(4-B), 1907. (UMI No. 2003-95020-071).
Langton, C. M., Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Peacock, E. J., Harkis, L., & Hansen, K. T. (in press). Actuarial assessment of risk for reoffence among adult sex offenders: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of the Static-2002 and five other instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior.
Litwack, T. R. (2001). Actuarial versus clinical assessments of dangerousness. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 7
Meehl, P. E. (1965). Detecting latent clinical taxa by fallible quantitative indicators lacking an accepted criterion. (Report No.-PR-65-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Research Laboratories of the Department of Psychiatry.
Meehl, P. E., & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52
Minnesota Board of Psychology. (2005). Minnesota Board of Psychology psychology practice act. Minneapolis: Minnesota Board of Psychology.
Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2000a). Sex offender policy board and management study. St. Paul: Author.
Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2000b). Sex offender supervision: 2000 report to the Legislature. St. Paul: Author.
Mossman, D. (1994a). Further comments on portraying the accuracy of violence prediction. Law and Human Behavior, 18
Mossman, D. (1994b). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62
Nuffield, J. (1982). Parole decision-making in Canada: Research towards decision guidelines. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada Research Division.
Prentky, R. A., Lee, A. F. S., Knight, R. A., & Cerce, D. (1997). Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: A methodological analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 21
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63
SAS Institute, Inc. (2005). SAS language reference: Dictionary, Version 9. Cary, NC: Author.
Scott, D. W. (1992). Multivariate density estimation: Theory, practice, and visualization. New York: Wiley.
Seto, M. C. (2005). Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 17
Shao, J. (1996). Bootstrap model selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91
SPSS, Inc. (2005). SPSS 14.0 Base user’s guide. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Szmukler, G. (2001). Violence risk prediction in practice. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178
Venables, W. N., Smith, D. M., & the R Development Core Team. (2002). An introduction to R. Bristol, UK: Network Theory, Ltd.
Wollert, R. W. (2002). The importance of cross-validation in actuarial test construction: Shrinkage in the risk estimates for the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool—Revised. Journal of Threat Assessment, 2
Wollert, R. W. (2003). Additional flaws in the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool—Revised. Journal of Threat Assessment, 2