Skip to main content
Log in

Gender, Threat/Control-Override Delusions and Violence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

This study brings together the threat/control-override perspective and the literature on gender and stress coping to argue that gender moderates the association between threat delusions and violence. We suggest that men are more likely than women to respond to stressors such as threat delusions with violence. We test these ideas using data from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study, a multi-wave study of post-discharge psychiatric patients. Within-person results from two-level hierarchical models support the idea that men and women cope with threat delusions differently. Specifically, we find that men are significantly more likely to engage in violence during periods when they experience threat delusions, compared with periods when they do not experience threat delusions. In contrast, women are significantly less likely to engage in violence during times when they experience threat delusions, compared with periods when they do not. We discuss these findings in light of the literature on gender and stress coping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We acknowledge that the stress coping perspective is only one possible explanation for our hypothesized findings, a point which we return to in the discussion. The gendered nature of stress coping provided the theoretical basis for our empirical expectations and is therefore presented in some detail in the introduction. It also stands in contrast to expectations derived from symbolic interactionist theory, upon which the TCO perspective was developed. We thank an anonymous reviewer for pointing out that alternative explanations for this pattern of findings may also be reasonable.

  2. The real power of these designs lies in their ability to control for unmeasured time stable variables in survey research, largely ruling out the possibility of selection bias (see Horney, Osgood, & Marshall, 1995, for a discussion of these methods).

References

  • Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., & Monahan, J. (2000). Violence and delusions: Data from the MacArthur violence risk assessment study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 566–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Britt, C. (2000). Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions. Justice Quarterly, 17, 707–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A., & Raudenbush, S. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M., & Armstrong, G. (2002). The effect of local life circumstances on female probationer’s offending. Justice Quarterly, 20, 213–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, G., & Zhao, H. (2000). Multilevel modeling for binary data. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 441–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, S., Hiscoke, U., & Freese, R. (2003). The antecedents of aggressive behavior among men with schizophrenia: A prospective investigation of patients in community treatment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 523–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horney, J., Osgood, D., & Marshall, I. (1995). Criminal careers in the short term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, C., Muley, E., & Gardner, W. (1993). The accuracy in assessment of psychiatric inpatients’ risk of violence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 1317–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, B., Andrews, H., & Cullen, F. (1992). The violence and illegal behavior of mental patients reconsidered. American Sociological Review, 57, 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, B., Monahan, J., Stueve, A., & Cullen, F. (1999). Real in their consequences: A sociological approach to understanding the association between psychotic symptoms and violence. American Sociological Review, 64, 316–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, B., & Stueve, A. (1994). Psychotic symptoms and the violent/illegal behavior of mental patients compared to community controls. In J. Monahan & H. Steadman (Eds.), Violence and mental disorder. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, B., Stueve, A., & Phelan, J. (1998). Psychotic symptoms and violent behaviors: Probing the components of “threat/control-override” symptoms. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33, S55–S60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., Roth, L., Grisso, T., & Banks, S. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, P., Monahan, J., & Silver, E. (2003). Mental disorder and violence: The moderating role of gender. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 561–571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E., Mulvey, E., & Monahan, J. (1999). Assessing violence risk among discharged psychiatric patients: Toward an ecological approach. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 235–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H., Mulvey, E., Monahan, J., Robbins, P., Appelbaum, P., Grisso, T., Roth, L., & Silver, E. (1998). Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 393–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stompe, T., Ortwein-Swoboda, G., & Schanda, H. (2004). Schizophrenia, delusional symptoms, and violence: The threat/control-override concept reexamined. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30, 31–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, L., Salovey, P., & Epel, E. (2002). Sex differences in stress responses: Social rejection versus achievement stress. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 318–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J., Borum, R., Swartz, M., & Monahan, J. (1996). Psychotic symptoms and disorders and the risk of violent behavior in the community. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 6, 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J., Estroff, S., Swartz, M., Borum, R., Lachicotte, W., Zimmer, C., & Wagner, R. (1997). Violence and severe mental disorder in clinical and community populations: The effects of psychotic symptoms, comorbidity, and lack of treatment. Psychiatry, 60, 1–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., Klein, L., Lewis, B., Gruenewald, T., Gurung, R., & Updegraff, J. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer, J., & Johnson, B. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. H. (1985). Linear models for the analysis of longitudinal studies. American Statistician, 39, 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brent Teasdale.

About this article

Cite this article

Teasdale, B., Silver, E. & Monahan, J. Gender, Threat/Control-Override Delusions and Violence. Law Hum Behav 30, 649–658 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9044-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9044-x

Keywords

Navigation