Heteronormativity and the European Court of Human Rights
- Paul Johnson
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This article examines a recent judgment by the European Court of Human Rights (E.B. v France) that upheld the complaint of a homosexual woman who alleged that her application for authorization to adopt a child had been refused by domestic French authorities on the grounds of her sexual orientation. I argue that the judgment constitutes an innovative and atypical legal consideration of, and challenge to, the heteronormative social relations of contemporary European societies. After exploring the evidence presented by the applicant, and the Court’s interpretation of it, I argue that in order to reach its judgment it was necessary for the Court to make a significant departure from its established jurisprudence in relation to sexual orientation. An essential element of this involved the adoption of a distinctive critical approach, strongly resonant with aspects of ‘queer theory’, which focused attention on the social, cultural and political construction of normative heterosexuality. Whilst a number of commentators have assessed the importance of the judgment in terms of its evolution of ‘gay rights’ in the area of family life, I argue that the Court’s reconceptualized ‘theoretical’ understanding of, and critical approach to, heteronormativity offers the potential to expand the scope of the European Convention on Human Rights across a number of areas of social life—in marriage, public assembly, freedom of expression, as well as family life—where non-heterosexuals continue to face discrimination in contemporary Europe.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Barclay, Scott, Mary Bernstein, and Anna-Marie Marshall. 2009. Queer mobilizations: LGBT activists confront the law. New York: NYU Press.
- Berlant, Lauren, and Michael Warner. 1998. Sex in public. Critical Inquiry 24(2): 547–566. CrossRef
- Boussiakou, Iris, and Robin C.A. White. 2009. Separate opinions in the European court of human rights. Human Rights Law Review 9(1): 37–60. CrossRef
- Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
- Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge.
- Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.
- Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of violence and mourning. London: Verso.
- Carabine, Jean. 1996. Heterosexuality and social policy. In Theorising heterosexuality, ed. Diane Richardson. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Curry-Sumner, Ian. 2009. E.B. v France: A missed opportunity? Child and Family Law Quarterly 21(3): 356.
- Doty, Kathleen A. 2009. From Fretté to E.B.: The European Court of Human Rights on gay and lesbian adoption. Law and Sexuality 18: 121–141.
- Foucault, Michel. 1979. The history of sexuality, volume 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
- Fuss, Diane. 1991. Inside/out. In Inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories, ed. Diane Fuss. New York: Routledge.
- Grigolo, Michele. 2003. Sexualities and the ECHR: Introducing the universal sexual legal subject. European Journal of International Law 14: 1023–1044. CrossRef
- Halperin, David. 1995. Saint=Foucault: Towards a gay hagiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hart, Linda. 2009. Individual adoption by non-heterosexuals and the order of family life in the European court of human rights. Journal of Law and Society 36(4): 536–557. CrossRef
- Hicks, Stephen. 2001. “Good lesbian, bad lesbian…”: Regulating heterosexuality in fostering and adoption assessments. Child and Family Social Work 5(2): 157–168.
- Hicks, Stephen. 2005. Lesbian and gay foster care and adoption: a brief UK history. Adoption and Fostering Journal 29(3): 42–56.
- Human Rights Watch Europe. 2008. ‘Gay adoption ruling advances family equality’. http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2008/01/23/europe-gay-adoption-ruling-advances-family-equality.
- Ingraham, Chris. 1996. The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender. In Queer theory/sociology, ed. Steven Seidman. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Jackson, Stevi. 1999. Heterosexuality in question. London: Sage.
- Johnson, Paul. 2005. Love, heterosexuality and society. London: Routledge.
- Johnson, Paul. 2010. ‘An essentially private manifestation of human personality’: Constructions of homosexuality in the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review 10(1): 67–97. CrossRef
- Keller, Helen, and Alec Stone Sweet. 2008. A Europe of rights: The impact of the ECHR on national legal systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Letsas, George. 2008. No human right to adopt. UCL Human Rights Law Review 1: 134–153.
- Loizidou, Elena. 2008. Butler and life: Law, sovereignty, power. In Judith Butler’s precarious politics: Critical encounters, ed. Terrell Carver, and Samuel A. Chambers, 145–156. Abingdon: Routledge.
- McGhee, Derek. 2001. Heterosexuality, law and resistance. London: Routledge. CrossRef
- Moran, Leslie J. 1996. The homosexual(ity) of law. London: Routledge.
- Morgan, Wayne. 2001. Queering international human rights law. In Law, sexuality: The global arena, ed. Carl F. Stychin, and Didi Herman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Mowbray, Alastair. 2005. The creativity of the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review 5(1): 57–79. CrossRef
- Rich, Adrienne. 1986. Blood, bread and poetry: Selected prose 1979–1985. London: Virago Press.
- Sedgwick, Eve. 1990. Epistemology of the closet. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
- Smart, Carol. 1996. Collusion, collaboration and confession: on moving beyond the heterosexuality debate. In Theorising heterosexuality, ed. Diane Richardson. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Stychin, Carl F. 2003. Governing sexuality: The changing politics of citizenship and law reform. Oxford: Hart.
- Warner, Michael. 1993. Fear of a queer planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Weeks, Jeffrey, Brian Heaphy, and Catherine Donovan. 2001. Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. London: Routledge. CrossRef
- Wilkinson, Celia, and Sue Kitzinger. 1993. Theorizing heterosexuality. In Heterosexuality: A feminism, psychology reader, ed. Celia Wilkinson, and Sue Kitzinger. London: Sage.
- Wintemute, Robert. 1995. Sexual orientation and human rights: The United States Constitution, the European convention, and the Canadian charter. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Wittig, Monique. 1979. Paradigm. In Homosexualities and French Literature, ed. George Stambolian, and Elaine Marks. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
About this Article
- Heteronormativity and the European Court of Human Rights
Law and Critique
Volume 23, Issue 1 , pp 43-66
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- European convention on human rights
- Sexual orientation
- Queer theory
- Industry Sectors
- Paul Johnson (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK