Skip to main content
Log in

Synthesis of activated carbon from coal pitch for mercury removal in coal-fired power plants

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Activated carbon (AC) is an effective adsorbent that is used in a wide range of applications. This is due to its high adsorption capacity and fast removal rate. This study evaluated processing conditions for synthesizing AC from coal pitch. The objective was to establish what processing conditions produced AC with the best adsorption performance. Factors such as carbonization temperature, activation temperature, steam flow rate and the addition of additives have been studied. A real-time, fixed-bed mercury adsorption system was used to evaluate the AC prepared from coal pitch. Results showed that the temperature and the KOH mixing rate in the carbonization process play an important role in the formation of the functional groups on the surface of the char. Additionally, the temperature and the steam flow rate in the activation process significantly affects AC surface area and pore distribution, important factors relating to mercury adsorption performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spahis N, Addoun A, Mahmoudi H, Ghaffour N. Purification of water by activated carbon prepared from olive stones. Desalination. 2008;222(1):519–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. De M, Azargohar R, Dalai AK, Shewchuk SR. Mercury removal by bio-char based modified activated carbons. Fuel. 2013;103(1):570–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sumathi S, Bhatia S, Lee KT, Mohamed AR. Selection of best impregnated palm shell activated carbon (PSAC) for simultaneous removal of SO2 and NOx. J Hazard Mater. 2010;176(1):1093–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou J, Hao S, Gao L, Zhang Y. Study on adsorption performance of coal based activated carbon to radioactive iodine and stable iodine. Ann Nucl Energy. 2014;72(5):237–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Horikawa T, Takeda I, Muroyama K, Ani FN. Preparing activated carbon from various nutshells by chemical activation with K2CO3. Carbon. 2002;40(2):2381–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng Y, Jensen AD, Windelin C, Windelinb C, Jensen F. Review of technologies for mercury removal from flue gas from cement production processes. Prog Energ Combust. 2012;38(5):599–629.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scala F, Chirone R, Lancia A. Elemental mercury vapor capture by powdered activated carbon in a fluidized bed reactor. Fuel. 2011;90(6):2077–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sjostrom S, Durham M, Jean Bustard C, Martin C. Activated carbon injection for mercury control: overview. Fuel. 2010;89(6):1320–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutson ND, Ryan SP, Touati A. Assessment of PCDD/F and PBDD/F emissions from coal-fired power plants during injection of brominated activated carbon for mercury control. Atmos Environ. 2009;43(26):3973–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Graydon JW, Zhang X, Kirk DW, Jia CQ. Sorption and stability of mercury on activated carbon for emission control. J Hazard Mater. 2009;168(2):978–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Derenne S, Sartorelli P, Bustard J, Stewart R, Sjostrom S, Johnson P, McMillian M, Sudhoff F, Chang R. TOXECON clean coal demonstration for mercury and multi-pollutant control at the Presque Isle Power Plant. Fuel Process Technol. 2009;90(11):1400–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghorishi SB, Keeney RM, Serre SD, Gullett BK, Jozewicz WS. Development of a Cl-impregnated activated carbon for entrained-flow capture of elemental mercury. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;36(20):4454–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Uysal T, Duman G, Onal Y, Yasa I, Yanik J. Production of activated carbon and fungicidal oil from peach stone by two-stage process. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2014;108(7):47–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Arriagada R, García R, Molina-Sabio M, Rodrigue-reinose F. Effect of steam activation on the porosity and chemical nature of activated carbons from Eucalyptus globulus and peach stones. Micropor Mater. 1997;8(3):123–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhong L, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Sui ZF, Cao Y, Pan WP. Study of mercury adsorption by selected Chinese coal fly ashes. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;116(3):1197–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jibril B, Houache O, Al-Maamari R, Al-Maamari B. Effects of H3PO4 and KOH in carbonization of lignocellulosic material. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2008;83(2):151–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Figueiredo JL, Pereira MFR, Freitas MMA, Orfao JJM. Modification of the surface chemistry of activated carbons. Carbon. 1999;37(9):1379–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 program) (No. 2013AA065404).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongsheng Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, L., Zhang, Y., Ji, Y. et al. Synthesis of activated carbon from coal pitch for mercury removal in coal-fired power plants. J Therm Anal Calorim 123, 851–860 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4966-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4966-5

Keywords

Navigation