Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of volatiles on the measurement of the reaction heat by differential scanning calorimetry

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When gases evolve during a chemical reaction, a fraction of the reaction heat is lost with them. We have analyzed, both theoretically and experimentally, the deviations that this effect can produce on the determination of the reaction heat by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). It is shown that, even in the absence of gas overheating, deviations related to variations in the sample heat capacity can be substantial in experiments involving very intense DSC peaks. However, experiments performed on thermal decomposition of metal organic salts and on evaporation of liquids have shown that deviations usually arise from gas overheating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

α :

Transformed fraction

β :

Heating rate of the reference temperature

C :

Heat capacity of the sample placed inside the pan

C A, C B :

Heat capacity of the solid sample at the beginning and at the end of the reaction

C G :

Heat capacity of the evolved gas

c pS, c pL, c pG :

Specific heat capacity (per unit mass) at constant pressure of solid, liquid and gas

C REF :

Pan heat capacity

DSCP :

DSC value after baseline subtraction

ΔH :

Enthalpy of reaction

ΔT G :

Gas overheating above T S

ΔQ C, ΔQ G, ΔQ P :

Corrections to the measured heat due to gas evolution (see main text)

L BOIL :

Latent heat of boiling

L EV :

Latent heat of evaporation

m :

Mass of the sample remaining inside the pan

Q :

DSC peak area (after baseline subtraction)

\( \dot{q}_{{}} \) :

Heat power exchanged due to a chemical reaction \( \left( {\Delta H = - \int {\dot{q}} \,{\text{d}}t} \right) \)

\( \dot{Q}_{\text{REF}} \) :

Heat power flowing through the “sample” side of the DSC sensor

\( \dot{Q}_{\text{S}} \) :

Idem through the “reference” side

R :

Thermal resistance of the DSC sensor

T BOIL :

Boiling point

T REF :

Temperature at the “reference” side of the DSC sensor

T S :

Temperature at the “sample” side of the DSC sensor

τ SIGNAL :

Time constant characteristic of the DSC signal

References

  1. Zemansky MW, Dittman RH. Heat and thermodynamics, Ch. 10. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Farjas J, Roura P, Ricart S, Mestres N, Obradors X, Puig T. Thermal analysis for low temperature synthesis of oxide thin films from chemical solutions. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:20133–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. HöhneGWH Hemminger W, Flammersheim H-J. Differential scanning calorimetry: an introduction for practitioners. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Eloussifi H, Farjas J, Roura P, Dammak M. Thermal gradients in thermal analysis experiments: criterions to prevent inaccuracies when determining sample temperature and kinetic parameters. Thermochim Acta. 2014;589:37–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Roduit B, Xia L, Folly P, Berger B, Mathieu J, Sarbach A, Andres H, Ramin M, Vogelsanger B, Spitzer D, Moulard H, Dilhan D. The simulation of the thermal behavior of energetic materials based on DSC and HFC signals. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2008;93:143–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwartz R, Schneller T, Waser R. Chemical solution deposition of electronic oxide films. C. R. Chimie. 2004;7:433–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roura P, Farjas J, Camps J, Ricart S, Arbiol J, Puig T, Obradors X. Decomposition processes and structural transformations of cerium propionate into nanocrystalline ceria at different oxygen partial pressures. J Nanopart Res. 2011;13:4085–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eloussifi H, Farjas J, Roura P, Camps J, Dammak M, Ricart S, Puig T, Obradors X. Evolution of Yttrium trifluoroacetate during thermal decomposition. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;108:589–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Farjas J, Camps J, Roura P, Ricart S, Puig T, Obradors X. The thermal decomposition of barium trifluoroacetate. Thermochim Acta. 2012;544:77–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Butrow AB, Seyler RJ. Vapor pressure by DSC: extending ASTM E 1782 below 5 kPa. Thermochim Acta. 2003;402:145–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Contreras MD, Girela F, Parera A. The perfection of a method for the determination of the temperature vapor-pressure function of liquids by differential scanning calorimetry. Thermochim Acta. 1993;219:167–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cedeño FO, Prieto MM, Espina A, Garcia JR. Fast method for the experimental determination of vaporization enthalpy by differential scanning calorimetry. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2003;73:775–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by the Spanish Programa Nacional de Materiales through projects MAT2011-28874-C02-02 and by the Generalitat de Catalunya contract No. 2009SGR-185. The authors thank the University of Girona for the PhD fellowship granted to Daniel Sánchez-Rodríguez and for the use of the thermal analysis facilities (Serveis Tècnics de Recerca).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pere Roura.

Appendix

Appendix

Calculation of ΔQ P and ΔQ C

We need to calculate the third term on the right-hand side of Eq. 10:

$$ \Delta Q_{\text{C}} +\Delta Q_{\text{P}} = R\mathop \int \nolimits \left( {C_{\text{REF}} - C} \right){\text{dDSC}}. $$
(18)

Integration by parts and substitution of C by its value of Eq. 5 leads to:

$$ \Delta Q_{\text{C}} +\Delta Q_{\text{P}} = R\left( {C_{\text{REF}} + C_{\text{B}} } \right){\text{DSC}}_{\text{f}} - R\left( {C_{\text{REF}} + C_{\text{A}} } \right){\text{DSC}}_{\text{i}} + R(C_{\text{A}} - C_{\text{B}} )\int {{\text{DSC}}\frac{{{\text{d}}\alpha }}{{{\text{d}}t}} {\text{d}}t} , $$
(19)

where “i” and “f” refer to the value before and after the DSC peak. ΔQ C is the addition of the first two terms. If we take into account that

$$ {\text{DSC}}_{{{\text{f,}}\,{\text{i}}}} = - (C_{\text{REF}} + C_{{{\text{B}},{\text{A}}}} )\beta , $$
(20)

and consider that, usually,

$$ C_{\text{REF}} + C_{\text{B}} \cong C_{\text{REF}} + C_{\text{A}} , $$
(21)

we arrive to the desired result:

$$ \Delta Q_{\text{C}} \cong R(C_{\text{REF}} + C_{\text{A}} )( C_{\text{A}} - C_{\text{B}} )\beta , $$
(22)

where R(C REF + C A) is the DSC time constant τ SIGNAL [3] at the beginning of the reaction. For reactions involving gas evolution, R (C REF + C A) > τ SIGNAL.

The last term in Eq. 19 is ΔQ P. In general, α can be obtained from a TG curve (Eq. 6). In those cases where the time response of the DSC signal is short enough, use of Eq. 7 leads to the desired result:

$$ \Delta Q_{\text{P}} = \frac{{R(C_{\text{A}} - C_{\text{B}} )}}{Q}\int {{\text{DSC}} \cdot {\text{DSC}}_{\text{P}} {\text{d}}t} . $$
(23)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García, E., Sánchez-Rodríguez, D., López-Olmedo, J.P. et al. The effect of volatiles on the measurement of the reaction heat by differential scanning calorimetry. J Therm Anal Calorim 121, 187–194 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4465-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4465-8

Keywords

Navigation