Revealing Student Teachers’ Thinking through Dilemma Analysis
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
We explore the potential of dilemma analysis as an assessment tool to reveal student teachers’ thinking and concerns about their practice. For this purpose we analyze the dilemma analyses completed by 22 student teachers enrolled in our science teacher preparation program over a period of four semesters. Student teachers’ dilemmas fall into two main groups: dilemmas about student performance and dilemmas associated with instructional decisions. These dilemmas reveal a variety of concerns that student teachers have about their work. In particular, concerns about lack of student motivation and its consequences on performance and instruction play a central role in student teachers’ thinking. The recognition of common patterns of thought in our student teacher thinking has made us reflect on and re-evaluate important components of the curriculum in our science teacher preparation program.
- Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Carter, K. (1990). Teachers’ knowledge and learning to teach. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 291–310). New York: Macmillan.
- Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255–296). New York: Macmillan.
- Connelley, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 2–14. CrossRef
- Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. New York: Nichols Publishing.
- Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251. CrossRef
- Evans, E. D., & Tribble, M. (1986). Perceived teaching problems, self-efficacy, and commitment to teaching among preservice teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 80(2), 81–85.
- Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207–226. CrossRef
- Fuller, F. F., & Brown, O. H. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher education (Seventy-fourth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Haritos, C. (2004). Understanding teaching through the minds of teacher candidates: A curious blend of realism and idealism. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 637–654. CrossRef
- Kagan, D. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129–169. CrossRef
- Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55(2), 178–194.
- Lampert, M. (1986). Teaching about thinking and thinking about teaching. In P. Taylor (Ed.), Developments in curriculum studies (pp. 233–259). London: NFER-Nelson.
- Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Marland, P., & Osborne, B. (1990). Classroom theory, thinking, and action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(1), 93–109. CrossRef
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Munby, H. (1986). Metaphor in the thinking of teachers: An exploratory study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18, 197–209.
- Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th ed., pp. 877–904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
- Nisbet, R., & Wilson, T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 83(3), 231–259. CrossRef
- Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
- Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
- Talanquer, V., Novodvorsky, I., Slater, T. F., & Tomanek, D. (2003). A stronger role for science departments in the preparation of future chemistry teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 1168–1171. CrossRef
- Tobin, K. (1990). Changing metaphors and beliefs: A master switch for teaching? Theory Into Practice, 29(2), 122–127. CrossRef
- Tomanek, D. (1994). A case of dilemmas: Exploring my assumptions about teaching science. Science Education, 78(5), 399–414. CrossRef
- Tomanek, D. (1996). Developing teacher reflection on practice with practical inquiry. Reflect: The Journal of Reflection in Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 27–35.
- Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143–178. CrossRef
- Revealing Student Teachers’ Thinking through Dilemma Analysis
Journal of Science Teacher Education
Volume 18, Issue 3 , pp 399-421
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Science Teacher Preparation Program, College of Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, U.S.A
- 2. Department of Chemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA
- 3. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, U.S.A
- 4. Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, U.S.A