Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of a track shape analysis-based automated slide scanner system with traditional methods

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During recent years, CR-39 detector measurements have gained attention due to improvements in image processing methods. An assessment method based on the application of a high-resolution slide scanner and its quality checks is introduced, using commercially available software and hardware. Using the conventional (visual) comparing analysis for 563 detectors, the method was found suitable for high-precision and reliable track analysis. The accuracy of the measurements were not disturbed by any other pseudo-tracks (scratches or contamination) due to the signal shape of the analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Young DA (1958) Nature 182:375–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Silk ECH, Barnes RS (1959) Examination of fission fragment tracks with an electron microscope. Phil Mag 4:970–971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gold R, Armani RJ, Roberts JH (1968) Absolute fission-rate measurements with solid-state track recorders. Nucl Sci Eng 34:13–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Szeiler G, Somlai J, Ishikawa T, Omori Y, Mishra R, Sapra BK, Mayya YS, Tokonami S, Csordás A, Kovács T (2012) Preliminary results from an indoor radon thoron survey in Hungary. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 152:243–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams JH Jr (1980) Automated track measurements in CR-39. Nucl Tracks 4:67–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gold R, Roberts JH, Preston CC, McNeece JP, Ruddy FH (1984) The status of automated nuclear scanning systems. Nucl Tracks Radiat Meas 8:187–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dolleiser M, Hashemi-Nezhad SR (2002) A fully automated optical microscope for the analysis of particle tracks in solids. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 198:98–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yasuda N, Namiki K, Honma Y, Umeshima Y, Marumo Y, Ishii H, Benton ER (2005) Development of a high speed imaging microscope and new software for nuclear track detector analysis. Radiat Meas 40:311–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore ME (2002) Laser illuminated etched track scattering (LITES) dosimetry system. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 101:43–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bedogni R (2003) Development of a reader for the routine analysis of CR-39 fast neutron dosimeter’s improvement of the dosimetric performance using automatic vision and motion tools. Radiat Meas 36:239–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hulber E (2009) Overview of PADC nuclear track readers. Recent trends and solutions. Radia Meas 44:821–825

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vaginay F, Fromm M, Pusset D, Meesen G, Chambaudet A, Poffijn A (2001) 3-D Confocal microscopy track analysis—a promising tool for determining CR-39 response function. Radiat Meas 34:123–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Félix-Bautista R, Hernández-Hernández C, Zendejas-Leal BE, Fragoso R, Golzarri JI, Vázquez-López C, Espinosa G (2013) Evolution of etched nuclear track profiles of alpha particles in CR-39 by atomic force microscopy. Radiat Meas 50:197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Steele JD, Bhakta JR, Tanner RJ, Bartlett DT (1999) Development of a reader for track etch detectors based on a commercially available slide scanner. Radiat Meas 31:179–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ibrahimi ZF, Miles JCH (2008) Performance review of a slide scanner-based automated counting system for PADC radon detectors. Radiat Meas 43:S395–S400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsankov L, Pressyanov D, Mitev K, Georgiev S, Dimitrova I (2005) Automatic counting of chemically etched tracks by means of a computer scanner. Radiat Meas 39:557–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fairchild R, Tjong L, Wright T (2011) Automatic radon solid state track detector measurements. Radiat Meas 46:1773–1777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fews AP (1992) Fully automated image analysis of etched tracks in CR-39. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 71:465–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pálfalvi J, Sajó-Bohus L, Eördögh I (1999) First international intercomparison of image analysers. Radiat Meas 31:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Somogyi G, Szalay AS (1973) Nucl Instrum Methods 109:211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fews AP, Henshaw DL (1982) Nucl Instrum Methods 197:517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fromm M, Meyer P, Chambaudet A (1996) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 107:337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nikezic D, Yu KN (2003) Radiat Meas 37:39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pálfalvi JK, Eördögh I, Szász K, Sajó-Bohus L (1996) A new generation image analyser for evaluating SSNTDs. Radiat Meas 28:849–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Hungarian Research Grant OTKA No. K 81975 and Hungarian State and the European Union projects Grant No. TÁMOP-4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0071.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Bátor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bátor, G., Csordás, A., Horváth, D. et al. A comparison of a track shape analysis-based automated slide scanner system with traditional methods. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 306, 333–339 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4013-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4013-9

Keywords

Navigation