Abstract
Little is known about attributes that elicit romantic desirability in early adolescence. The current study, with a sample of 531 sixth-grade students (45 % boys) attending ethnically diverse middle schools, used a resource control framework to explore which self-reported behaviors (e.g., empathy and aggression) and peer-reported status (e.g., acceptance and perceived popularity) predict the likelihood of being considered romantically desirable (i.e., receiving at least one “crush” nomination from an opposite sex grademate). Self-reported empathy was positively associated with students’ romantic desirability (primarily for those with high peer acceptance), whereas self-reported aggression on its own did not. Both peer-acceptance and popularity also were positively associated with students’ romantic desirability, and aggressive behavior reduced popularity’s effect. Although aggression may be integral for obtaining high peer status across cultures, prosocial behaviors were romantically valued. Our findings suggest that peer-vetted social status elicits romantic interest and during early adolescence, nice guys and gals really do not finish last.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Andreou, E. (2006). Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence: Relations to overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International, 27, 339–353. doi:10.1177/01430343067286.
Arnocky, S., & Vallaincourt, T. (2012). A multi-informant longitudinal study on the relationship between aggression, peer victimization, and dating status in adolescence. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 253–270.
Bellmore, A. D., Nishina, A., Witkow, M. R., Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (2007). The influence of classroom ethnic composition on same- and other-ethnicity peer nominations in middle school. Social Development, 16, 720–740.
Boone, J. L., & Kessler, K. L. (1999). More status or more children? Social status, fertility reduction, and long-term fitness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 257–277.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Brakefield, T. A., Mednick, S. C., Wilson, H. W., De Neve, J. E., Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2014). Same-sex sexual attraction does not spread in adolescent peer networks. Archives of Sex Behavioral, 43, 335–344.
Brown, B. (1999). “You’re going out with who?”: Peer group influences on adolescent romantic relationships. In W. Furman, B. B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research, 33, 261–304. doi:10.1177/0049124104268644.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 countries. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–18.
Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2007). Differential relations of instrumental and reactive aggression with maladjustment: Does adaptivity depend on function? In P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little, & P. Rodkin (Eds.), Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior (pp. 85–105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carlson, W., & Rose, A. J. (2007). The role of reciprocity in romantic relationships in middle childhood and early adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53, 262–290.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modeling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 935–959. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.05.005.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 101–105.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Collins, W. A., Welsh, D. P., & Furman, W. (2009). Adolescent romantic relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 631–652. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163459.
Connolly, J., Craig, W., Goldberg, A., & Pepler, D. (1999). Conceptions of cross-sex friendships and romantic relationships in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28(4), 481–495.
Connolly, J., Furman, W., & Konarski, R. (2000a). The roles of peers in the emergence of heterosexual romantic relationships in adolescence. Child Development, 71, 1395–1408.
Connolly, J. A., & Goldberg, A. (1999). Romantic relationships in adolescence: The role of friends and peers in their emergence and development. In W. Furman, B. B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 266–290). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Connolly, J., Pepler, D., Craig, W., & Taradash, A. (2000b). Dating experiences of bullies in early adolescence. Child Maltreatment, 5, 299–312.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.
Dunphy, D. C. (1969). Cliques, crowds, and gangs. Melbourne: Chesire.
Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154–165.
Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2011). Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76, 48–73.
Forbes, E. E., & Dahl, R. E. (2010). Pubertal development and behavior: Hormonal activation of social and motivational tendencies. Brain and Cognition, 72, 66–72. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10.007.
Gallup, A. C., O’Brien, D. T., & Wilson, D. S. (2011). Intrasexual peer aggression and dating behavior during adolescence: An evolutionary perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 258–267.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Gangestad, S. W., Perea, E. F., Shapiro, J. R., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 980–994.
Hart, D., & Carlo, G. (2005). Moral development in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 223–233.
Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97–132. doi:10.1006/drev.1998.0470.
Hawley, P. H. (2011). The evolution of adolescence and the adolescence of evolution: The coming of age of humans and the theory about the forces that made them. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 307–316.
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196.
Houser, J. J., Mayeux, L., & Cross, C. (2015). Peer status and aggression as predictors of dating popularity in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 683–695. doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0174-z.
Kokko, H., Brooks, R., Jennions, M. D., & Morely, J. (2003). The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270, 653–664.
Larson, R. W., Wilson, S., Brown, B. B., Furstenberg, F. F, Jr, & Verman, S. (2002). Changes in adolescents’ interpersonal experiences: Are they being prepared for adult relationships in the twenty-first century? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 31–68.
Maynard Smith, J., & Harper, D. (2004). Animal signals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Nettle, D., & Clegg, H. (2006). Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biology, 273, 611–615.
Nishina, A. (2012). Microcontextual characteristics of peer victimization experiences and adolescents’ daily well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 191–201. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9669-z.
Nishina, A., Bellmore, A., Witkow, M., & Nylund-Gibson, K. (2010). Longitudinal consistency of adolescent ethnic identification across varying school ethnic contexts. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1389–1401.
Pellegrini, A. D. (2007). Is aggression adaptive? Yes: Some kinds are and in some ways. In P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little, & P. Rodkin (Eds.), Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior (pp. 85–105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2003). A sexual selection theory longitudinal analysis of sexual segregation and integration in early adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 257–278. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00060-2.
Phinney, J. S. (1989). Stages of ethnic identity development in minority group adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 9, 34–49.
Russell, S. T., Watson, R., & Muraco, J. A. (2011). The development of same-sex intimate relationships during adolescence. In B. Laursen & W. A. Collins (Eds.), Relationship Pathways: From Adolescence to Young Adulthood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stump, K. N., Biggs, J., & Hawley, P. (2015). A dyadic analysis of power and friendship functioning. Journal of relationships Research, 6, 1–12. doi:10.1017/jrr.2015.
Tatum, B. D. (1999). Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria: And other conversations about race. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Trivers, R. (1985). Social Evolution. Menlo Park, CA: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing.
Weisfeld, G. (1999). Evolutionary principles of human adolescence. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Whitbeck, L. B., Yoder, K. A., Hoyt, D. R., & Conger, R. D. (1999). Early adolescent sexual activity: A developmental study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 934–946.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 59–73.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF BCS-1147593) awarded to Amy Bellmore (PI), Melissa R. Witkow and Adrienne Nishina (co-PIs). Portions of this study were presented at the Society for Research on Adolescence biennial conference in Austin, Texas in March 2014.
Author contributions
A.R.B. conceived of the study, drafted the manuscript, primarily responsible for present study design, conceptualization and operationalization, primary coordinator of statistical analyses, and participated in data collection; A.N. participated in the design and interpretation of data, coordination of the overall present study and data collection, made extensive reviews of draft(s); M.W. coordinated the overall study and data collection, provided an extensive critical review and remarks for intellectual clarity; A.B. coordinated overall study and data collection, provided an extensive critical review and remarks of intellectual clarity. All authors gave final approval prior to manuscript submission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bower, A.R., Nishina, A., Witkow, M.R. et al. Nice Guys and Gals Finish Last? Not in Early Adolescence When Empathic, Accepted, and Popular Peers are Desirable. J Youth Adolescence 44, 2275–2288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0346-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0346-5