The Age–Crime Curve in Adolescence and Early Adulthood is Not Due to Age Differences in Economic Status
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
One of the most consistent findings in developmental criminology is the “age–crime curve”—the observation that criminal behavior increases in adolescence and decreases in adulthood. Recently, Brown and Males (Justice Policy J 8:1–30, 2011) conducted an analysis of aggregate arrest, poverty, and population data from California and concluded that the widely-observed adolescent peak in rates of offending is not a consequence of developmental factors, but rather an artifact of age differences in economic status. Youngsters, they argue, offend more than adults because they are poorer than adults. The present study challenges Brown and Males’ proposition by analyzing data from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth (NLSY97; N = 8,984; 51 % female; 26 % Black, 21 % Hispanic, 52 % non-Black, non-Hispanic; ages 12–18 at Wave 1), which collected measures of criminal behavior and economic status at multiple time points. Consistent with scores of other studies, we find that criminal offending peaks in adolescence, even after controlling for variation in economic status. Our findings both counter Brown and Males’ claim that the age–crime curve is illusory and underscore the danger of drawing inferences about individual behavior from analysis of aggregated data.
- Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., & Visher, C. (Eds.). (1986). Criminal careers and “career criminals” (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Brame, R., Fagan, J., Piquero, A. R., Schubert, C. A., & Steinberg, L. (2004). Criminal careers of serious delinquents in two cities. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 256–272. CrossRef
- Brown, E., & Males, M. (2011). Does age or poverty level best predict criminal arrest and homicide rates? A preliminary investigation. Justice Policy Journal, 8, 1–30.
- Casey, B. J., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Developmental Review, 28, 62–77. CrossRef
- Chein, J., Albert, D., O’Brien, L., Uckert, K., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Developmental Science, 14(2), F1–F10.
- Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., Figueredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicius, V., et al. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology, 48(3), 598–623. CrossRef
- Ernst, M., Pine, D. S., & Hardin, M. (2006). Triadic model of the neurobiology of motivated behavior in adolescence. Psychological Medicine, 36(3), 299–312. CrossRef
- Farnworth, M., Thornberry, T. P., Krohn, M. D., & Lizotte, A. J. (1994). Measurement in the study of class and delinquency: Integrating theory and research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 32–61. CrossRef
- Farrington, D. P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189–250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Farrington, D. P. (1998). Individual differences and offending. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 241–268). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Farrington, D. P., Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2013). Offending from childhood to late middle age: Recent results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. New York: Springer. CrossRef
- Figner, B., Mackinlay, R. J., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 709–730. CrossRef
- Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision-making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625–635. CrossRef
- Giedd, J. N. (2012). The digital revolution and adolescent brain evolution. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(2), 101–105. CrossRef
- Giedd, J. N., & Rapoport, J. L. (2010). Structural MRI of pediatric brain development: What have we learned and where are we going? Neuron, 67, 728–734. CrossRef
- Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552–584. CrossRef
- Kirk, D. S. (2008). The neighborhood context of racial and ethnic disparities in arrest. Demography, 45, 55–77. CrossRef
- Lauritsen, J. L. (1999). Limitations in the use of longitudinal self-report data: A comment. Criminology, 37, 687–702. CrossRef
- Males, M. (2009). Does the adolescent brain make risk taking inevitable? A skeptical appraisal. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 3–20. CrossRef
- Moffitt, T. E. (1993). ‘Life-course-persistent’ and ‘adolescence-limited’ antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701. CrossRef
- Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2009). Affiliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1520–1530. CrossRef
- Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635–655. CrossRef
- Piquero, A. R. (2008). Disproportionate minority contact. The Future of Children, 18, 59–79. CrossRef
- Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 359–506). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Piquero, A. R., Monahan, K. C., Glasheen, C., Schubert, C. A., & Mulvey, E. (2012). Does time matter? Comparing trajectory concordance and covariate association using time-based and age-based assessments. Crime & Delinquency. doi:10.1177/0011128712459491.
- Quetelet, A. (1831). Research on the propensity to crime of different ages. Brussels: Hayez.
- Reyna, V. F., & Farley, F. (2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision-making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(1), 1–44.
- Robinson, W. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357. CrossRef
- Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 555–592. CrossRef
- Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Raudenbush, S. (2005). Social anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 224–232. CrossRef
- Sampson, R. J., & Wilson, W. J. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In J. Hagan & R. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 37–56). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Shulman, E. P., & Cauffman, E. (2013). Deciding in the dark: Age differences in intuitive risk judgment. Developmental Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0032778.
- Smith, D. A. (1986). The neighborhood context of police behavior. In A. Reiss & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and justice (Vol. 8, pp. 313–341). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Somerville, L. H. (2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 129–135. CrossRef
- Steffensmeier, D. J., Allan, E. A., Harer, M. D., & Streifel, C. (1989). Age and the distribution of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 803–831. CrossRef
- Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106. CrossRef
- Sweeten, G., Piquero, A. R., & Steinberg, L. (2013). Age and the explanation of crime, revisited. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9926-4.
- Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2002). Comparison of self-report and official data for measuring crime. In J. V. Pepper & C. V. Petrie (Eds.), Measurement problems in criminal justice research: Workshop summary (pp. 43–94). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (2010). The 1997 HHS Guidelines. Retrieved from: http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/97poverty.htm.
- Warr, M. (1993). Age, peers, and delinquency. Criminology, 31, 17–40. CrossRef
- The Age–Crime Curve in Adolescence and Early Adulthood is Not Due to Age Differences in Economic Status
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Volume 42, Issue 6 , pp 848-860
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Age–crime curve
- Juvenile offending
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Psychology Department, University of Pennsylvania, 3701 Market Street, Ste. 216, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- 2. Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- 3. Department of Psychology, Temple University, Weiss Hall, 1701 N. 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
- 4. School of Economic, Political, and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA