Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developmental Differences in Adolescents’ and Young Adults’ Use of Mothers, Fathers, Best Friends, and Romantic Partners to Fulfill Attachment Needs

  • OriginalPaper
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Adolescents and young adults (three age groups: 12–15, 16–19, and 20–28 years) reported their use of parents, and peers to fulfill attachment functions (proximity-seeking, safe haven, and secure base.) The use of each target figure varied with age and attachment function. Mothers were an important source of security across this age range. They were used as secure base consistently more than fathers or peers for all age groups, and regardless of whether or not participants had romantic partners; but were used less for proximity and safe haven by the two older groups. Best friends were used most and more than others as a safe haven; but were used less by young adults (vs. early adolescents) and by older adolescents with romantic partners. Romantic partners were used most and more than others for proximity; but were used less by early adolescents than by older participants. Fathers were selected less than other targets for all attachment functions. Those with romantic partners turned to them more than to others, and young adults selected their romantic partners as much as friends for safe haven. Those insecurely attached to mother turned to her less and to romantic partners more than did those securely attached. Implications for developmental changes in adolescent attachments are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., and Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of The Strange Situation. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, NJ.

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., and Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. Am. Psychol. 46: 333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. P., and Land, D. (1999). Attachment in adolescence. In Cassidy, J. and Shaver, P. (eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. The Guilford Press, New York.

  • Bartholomew, K., and Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61: 226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blishen, B. R., Carroll, W. K., and Moore, C. (1987). The 1981 socioeconomic index for occupations in Canada. Can. Rev. Sociol. Anthropol. 24: 465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1979). The Making & Breaking of Affectional Bonds. Tavistock Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2., Separation: Anxiety and anger. Basic Books, New York .

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment And Healthy Human Development. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brendgen, M., Markiewicz, D., Doyle, S. B., and Bukowski, W. M. (2001). The relations between friendship quality, ranked friendship preferences, and adolescents’ behavior with their friends. Merrill-Palmer Quart. 47: 395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., and Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 11: 471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, J. A., and Treboux, D. (1995). A review of adult attachment measures: Implications for theory and research. Soc. Dev. 4: 194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, A. B., Brendgen, M., Markiewicz, D., and Kamker, K. (2003). Family relationships as moderators of the association between romantic relationships and adjustment in early adolescence. J. Early Adolesc. 23: 316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, B. F., and Collins, N. L. (2001). Predictors of caregiving in adult intimate relationships: An attachment theoretical perspective. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 80: 972.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., and Davis, K. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’ close friendships and romantic relationships. Pers. Relat. 4: 131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, H., and Brown, B. B. (2001). Primary attachment to parents and peers during adolescence: Differences by attachment style. J.Youth Adolesc. 30: 653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, W., and Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Dev. 63: 103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, W., Simon, V. A., Shaffer, L. and Bouchey, H. A. (2002). Adolescents’ working models and styles for relationships with parents, friends, and romantic partners. Child Dev. 73: 241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, W., and Wehner, E. A. (1994). Romantic views: Toward a theory of adolescent romantic relationships. In Montemayor, R., Adams, G. R., and Gullota, G. P. (eds.), Advances in Adolescent Development: Relationships During Adolescence. Vol. 6, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 168–175.

  • Griffin, D. W., and Bartholomew, K. (1994). Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67: 433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., Hutt, M. J., Sturgeon, J., and Bricker, T. (1991). The process of relinquishing parents as attachment figures. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.

  • Hazan, C., and Zeifman, D. (1994). Sex and the psychological tether. In Bartholomew, K., and Perlman, D. (eds.), Advances in Personal Relationships: Vol. 5. Attachment Processes in Adulthood. Jessica Kingsley, London, pp. 151–177.

  • Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four Factor Index of Social Status. New Haven, Connecticut. (Privately printed).

  • Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., and Bartholomew, K. (1993). Interpersonal problems, attachment styles, and outcome in brief dynamic psychotherapy. J. Consul. Clin. Psychol. 61(4): 549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyck, M. H. (1982). From gregariousness to intimacy: Marriage and friendship over the adult years. In Field, T. M., Huston, A., Quay, H. C., Troll, L., and Finley, G. E. (eds.), Review of Human Development. Wiley, New York, pp. 471–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M., Doyle, A., and Markiewicz, D. (1999). Developmental patterns in security of attachment to mother and father in late childhood and early adolescence: Associations with peer relations. Child Dev. 70: 202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M., Kaplan, N., and Cassidy, J. (1985) Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In Bretherton, I., and Waters, E. (eds.), Growing Points of Attachment Theory and Research. Monographs of The Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. 50, pp. 66–104.

  • Paterson, J. E., Field, J., and Pryor, J. (1994). Adolescents’ perceptions of their attachment relationships with their mothers, fathers, and friends. J.Youth Adolesc. 23: 579.

  • Scharfe, E., and Bartholomew, K. (1994). Reliability and stability of adult attachment patterns. Pers. Relat. 1: 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, A., and West, M. (1989). The functional discrimination of attachment and affiliation. Br. J. Psychiatr. 155: 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. Norton, NY.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper Collins College Publishers, New York.

  • Trinke, S. J., and Bartholomew, K. (1997). Hierarchies of attachment relationships in young adulthood. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 14: 603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, E., and Cummings, E. M. (2000). A secure base from which to explore close relationships. Child Dev. 71: 164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. (1998). A taxonomy of relationships. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 15: 671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. (1986). Continuities and transformations in social relationships from childhood to adulthood. In Hartup, W. H. and Rubin, Z. (eds.), Relationship and Development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was completed with assistance from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Quebec Fonds FCAR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorothy Markiewicz.

Additional information

Professor of Psychology and Applied Human Sciences, Concordia University. Received PhD in social psychology from Ohio State University. Research interests include close interpersonal relationships and adjustment.

Received MA in social/developmental psychology from Wilfrid Laurier University. Research interests include attachment and well-being in adolescence

Received PhD in developmental psychology from Stanford University. Research interests include parenting, attachment, and adjustment in adolescence

Received BA in Psychology (Honors) from Concordia University. Research interests include romantic relationships in adolescence

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markiewicz, D., Lawford, H., Doyle, A. et al. Developmental Differences in Adolescents’ and Young Adults’ Use of Mothers, Fathers, Best Friends, and Romantic Partners to Fulfill Attachment Needs. J Youth Adolescence 35, 121–134 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-9014-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-9014-5

KEY WORDS:

Navigation