Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A novel network-based analysis to measure efficiency in science and technology parks: the ISA framework approach

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last years, Science and Technology Parks (STPs) have been considered facilitators of inter-organizational relationships, as well as instruments of public policy, by creating networks and allowing access for the learning of local innovation. In this study, we propose a quantitative tool as support for measuring the efficiency of STPs through the analysis of the complex networks they form. We present a generic framework called the Inter-Relationship Science-Park Analysis (ISA) framework to study STPs at three different levels of management: (1) individual entities (research centres, universities, innovation companies, etc.); (2) STP global management; and (3) productive sector development. Moreover, we have applied the ISA framework to a real-world case study: the Walqa Science and Technology Park. Through it we have been able to know what relationships are established within this Science and Technology Park and which are the most important nodes in this network of interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audretsch, B. (1998). Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2), 18–29. doi:10.1093/oxrep/14.2.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Bozeman, B., Combs, K. L., Feldman, M., Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., et al. (2002). The economics of science and technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(2), 155–203. doi:10.1023/A:1014382532639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. The Academy of Management Journal, 5, 909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avnimelech, G., Schwartz, D., & Bar-El, R. (2007). Entrepreneurial high-tech cluster development: Israel’s experience with venture capital and technological incubators. European Planning Studies, 15(9), 1181–1198. doi:10.1080/09654310701529078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydalot, P. (1986). Milieux innovateurs en Europe. Paris: GREMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakouros, Y. L., Mardas, D. C., & Varsakelis, N. C. (2002). Science park, a high tech fantasy?: An analysis of the science parks of Greece. Technovation, 22(2), 123–128. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00087-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, A. (2011). Networking system and innovation outputs: the role of science and technology parks. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(5), 3. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v6n5p3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A. I., Nosella, A., & Petroni, G. (2006). Assessing science parks’ performances: Directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation, 26(4), 489–505. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170–1182. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780000.

  • Bosma, N., van Praag, M., Thurik, R., & de Wit, G. (2004). The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Business Economics, 23(3), 227–236. doi:10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000032032.21192.72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, P., & Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the world: The making of the 21st century industrial complexes. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebrián Tarrasón, D., Vidal, R., Salmerón, J. L., Bertolín, J. A., & Negre, P. (2011). Análisis de las empresas de base tecnológica de un parque científico y tecnológico basado en técnicas de redes sociales. In XV Congreso Internacional de Ingeniería de Proyectos (pp. 2376–2389). Huesca: Asociación Española de Dirección e Ingeniería de Proyectos (AEIPRO).

  • Chan, K.-Y. A., Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Pretorius, M. W. (2010). Knowledge exchange behaviours of science park firms: The innovation hub case. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(2), 207–228. doi:10.1080/09537320903498546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, F., van Oort, F., Geertman, S., & Hooimeijer, P. (2013). Science parks and the co-location of high-tech small- and medium-sized firms in China’s Shenzhen. Urban Studies, 51(5), 1073–1089. doi:10.1177/0042098013493020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dettwiler, P., Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2006). Business environment and property management issues: a study of growth firms in Sweden. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 8(3), 120–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 4, 660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, D. (1994). University-related science parks—“Seedbeds” or “enclaves” of innovation? Technovation, 14(2), 93–110. doi:10.1016/0166-4972(94)90099-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukugawa, N. (2006). Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, 381–400. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, E., & Heffernan, P. (2005). High-technology clustering through spin-out and attraction: The Cambridge case. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1127–1144. doi:10.1080/00343400500328289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower, S. M., & Harris, F. C. (1994). Science parks in the UK. Property Management, 12(4), 24–33. doi:10.1108/02637479410071036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronum, S., Verreynne, M.-L., & Kastelle, T. (2012). The role of networks in small and medium-sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 257–282. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00353.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, I. (1996). A look at Aston science park. Technovation, 16(5), 217–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, F., Husted, K., & Vestergaard, J. (2005). Second generation science parks: from structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society. Technovation, 25(9), 1039–1049. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, K. G., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2016). Science and technology parks: an annotated and analytical literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9522-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, B. (1996). A methodological framework to analyse the impact of science and technology parks. IASP and AURRP: The Economics of Science Parks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. O. (2008). Social and economic networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, D. A., & Cox, J. (2006). Guest editorial: New technology based firms in the knowledge economy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(2), 139–144. doi:10.1007/s11365-006-8680-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (2002). Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latorre-Martínez, M., Navarro-Elola, L., Pastor-Tejedor, J., & Íñiguez-Berrozpe, T. (2013). Analysis of the network of relations of organizations set up at Walqa technology park. In Advances in Sustainable & Competitive Manufacturing Systems (Vol. 1, pp. 1335–1346). Springer International Publishing.

  • Lesser, E., & Prusak, L. (1999). Communities of practice, social capital and organizational knowledge. Information Systems Review, 1(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A., & Scott, J. (2003). US science parks: the diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1323–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2007). The economics of university research parks. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 661–674. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grm030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., & Siegel, D. S. (2007). Innovation, entrepreneurship, and technological change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms—Academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31(6), 859–876. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00153-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2005). R&D networks and product innovation patterns—Academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on science parks. Technovation, 25(9), 1025–1037. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillat, D. (1995). Territorial dynamic, innovative milieus and regional policy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7(2), 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., Quintas, P., & Wield, D. (1991). High-tech fantasies: Science parks in society, science and space. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 2, 242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 26113. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillimore, J. (1999). Beyond the linear view of innovation in science park evaluation an analysis of western Australian technology park. Technovation, 19(11), 673–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponds, R., Oort, F. V., & Frenken, K. (2009). Innovation, spillovers and university-industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2), 231–255. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). The competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S., & Myrzakhmet, M. (2009). Between vision and reality: Promoting innovation through technoparks in an emerging economy. Technovation, 29, 645–656. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratinho, T., & Henriques, E. (2010). The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries: Evidence from Portugal. Technovation, 30, 278–290. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003). Assessing the impact of university science parks on research productivity: exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1357–1369. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00086-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. (2000). The formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 925–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandierdonck, R., Debackere, K., & Rappa, M. (1991). An assessment of science parks—Towards a better understanding of their role in the diffusion of technological knowledge. R&D Management, 21(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varga, A., Pontikakis, D., & Chorafakis, G. (2012). Metropolitan Edison and cosmopolitan Pasteur? Agglomeration and interregional research network effects on European R&D productivity. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(2), 229–263. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedovello, C. (1997). Science parks and university-industry interaction: Geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force. Technovation, 17(9), 491–531. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00027-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A., & Pick, G. (1909). Über den standort der industrien: Reine Theorie des Standorts. JCB Mohr.

  • Westhead, P., & Storey, D. J. (1995). Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms. Omega, 23(4), 345–360. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(95)00021-F.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business and Administration, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

    M. Pilar Latorre

  2. Department of Informatics and Systems Engineering, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

    Ramón Hermoso

  3. Defense University Center, University of Zaragoza, Ctra. Huesca, s/n, 50090, Zaragoza, Spain

    María A. Rubio

Authors
  1. M. Pilar Latorre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ramón Hermoso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. María A. Rubio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María A. Rubio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pilar Latorre, M., Hermoso, R. & Rubio, M.A. A novel network-based analysis to measure efficiency in science and technology parks: the ISA framework approach. J Technol Transf 42, 1255–1275 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9585-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9585-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation