Introduction to the symposium issue: nanotechnology innovation and policy—current strategies and future trajectories
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
- Bennett, I., & Sarewitz, D. (2006). Too little, too late? Research policies on the societal implications of nanotechnology in the United States. Science as Culture, 15(4), 309–325. CrossRef
- Besley, J., Kramer, V., & Priest, S. (2008). Expert opinion on nano-technology: Risks, benefits, and regulation. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(4), 549–558. CrossRef
- HM Government. (2010). UK nanotechnologies strategy: Small technologies, great opportunities. London: Ministerial Group on Nanotechnologies. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/interactive.bis.gov.uk/nano/.
- Lux Research. (2004). The nanotech report: Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. New York: Lux Research.
- Lux Research. (2007). The nanotech report 2006: Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. New York: Lux Research.
- Lux Research. (2009). The recession’s ripple effect on nanotech. State of the Market Report. New York (June 9).
- NSET. (2007). The national nanotechnology initiative: Research and development leading to a revolution in technology and industry. Washington DC: Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology, Committee on Technology, National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President.
- PCAST. (2010). Report to the president and congress on the third assessment of the national nanotechnology initiative. Washington DC: Executive Office of the President and President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
- PEN. (2009). Nanotech-enabled consumer products top the 1,000 mark. Release no. 64–09. Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
- Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (Eds.). (2001). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Roco, M. C., Hersam, M. C., & Mirkin, C. A. (Eds.). (2011). Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: Retrospective and outlook. Berlin: Springer.
- Shapira, P., & Wang, J. (2010). Follow the money. What was the impact of the nanotechnology funding boom of the past ten years? Nature, 468, 627–628. CrossRef
- Introduction to the symposium issue: nanotechnology innovation and policy—current strategies and future trajectories
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Volume 36, Issue 6 , pp 581-586
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- 2. School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0345, USA
- 3. Enterprise Innovation Institute and School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0640, USA