Participation, Performance, and Advancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering: What is at Issue and Why
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Using multi-staged methods developed in this research for coding/analysis of interview data, this article portrays women’s reported experiences of participation, performance, and advancement in academic science and engineering in a major technological institution. The methods and findings have implications for understanding the complexity underlying women’s participation and performance, and for practices and policies to support advancement of women faculty, particularly those in research universities.
Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology2004Professional Women and Minorities: A Total Human Resources Data CompendiumCPSTWashington, D.C.
Fox, M.F. 1991‘Gender, Environmental Milieu, and Productivity in Science’Zuckerman, H.Cole, J.Bruer, J. eds. The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific CommunityW. W. NortonNew York188204
Fox, M.F. 1992‘Research, Teaching, and Publication Productivity: Mutuality versus Competition in Academia’Sociology of Education65293305
Fox, M.F. 1996‘Women, Academia, and Careers in Science’Davis, C.S.Ginorio, A.Hollenshead, C.Lazarus, B.Rayman, P. eds. The Equity Equation: Fostering the Advancement of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics, and EngineeringJossey-BassSan Francisco265289
Fox, M.F. 1998‘Women in Science and Engineering: Theory, Practice, and Policy in Programs’Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society24201223
Fox, M.F. 1999‘Gender, Hierarchy, and Science’Chafetz, J.S. eds. Handbook of the Sociology of GenderKluwer Academic/Plenum PublishersNew York441457
Fox, M.F. 2000‘Organizational Environments and Doctoral Degrees Awarded to Women in Science and Engineering Departments’Women’s Studies Quarterly284761
Fox, M. F. 2001, “Women, Science, and Academia: Graduate Education and Careers.” Gender & Society 15 (October): 654–666.
Fox, M.F. 2003a‘Gender, Faculty, and Doctoral Education in Science and Engineering’Hornig, L. eds. Equal Rites, Unequal Outcomes: Women in American Research UniversitiesKluwer Academic/Plenum PublishersNew York
Fox, M.F. 2003bGeorgia Tech ADVANCE Survey of Faculty Perceptions, Needs, and ExperiencesGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlanta, Georgia
McDowell, D., 2003, ‘Report of the Georgia Tech Promotion and Tenure ADVANCE Committee’. Atlanta, Georgia: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2003. http://www.advance.gatech.edu/measure.html.
Long, J.S., Fox, M.F. 1995‘Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism’Annual Review of Sociology214571CrossRef
McIlwee, J., Robinson, G. 1992Women in EngineeringState University of New York PressAlbany
Platt, J. 2002‘The History of the Interview’Gurbrium, J.Holstein, J.A. eds. Handbook of Interview ResearchSage PublicationsThousand Oaks, California
Smith-Doerr, L. 2004Women’s Work: Gender Equality vs. Hierarchy in the Life SciencesLynne Rienner PublishersBoulder, Colorado
Sonnert, G., Holton, G. 1995Gender Differences in Science CareersRutgers University PressNew Brunswick, New Jersey
- Participation, Performance, and Advancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering: What is at Issue and Why
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Volume 31, Issue 3 , pp 377-386
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Public Policy, Center for Study of Women, Science and Technology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, 30332-0345, USA
- 2. School of Literature, Communication, and Culture, and Center for Study of Women, Science and Technology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, 30332-0165, USA