Abstract
In many countries around the world, there has been an increasing emphasis on improving science education. Recent reform efforts in the USA call for teachers to integrate scientific and engineering practices into science teaching; for example, science teachers are asked to provide learning experiences for students that apply crosscutting concepts (e.g., patterns, scale) and increase understanding of disciplinary core ideas (e.g., physical science, earth science). Engineering practices and engineering design are essential elements of this new vision of science teaching and learning. This paper presents a research study that evaluates the effects of an engineering design-based science curriculum on student learning and attitudes. Three middle school life science teachers and 275 seventh grade students participated in the study. Content assessments and attitude surveys were administered before and after the implementation of the curriculum unit. Statewide mathematics test proficiency scores were included in the data analysis as well. Results provide evidence of the positive effects of implementing the engineering design-based science unit on student attitudes and learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (2014) AAAS project 2061 science assessment. Retrieved from http://assessment.aaas.org/
Bottoms G, Uhn J (2007) Project lead the way works: a new type of career and technical program. Southern Regional Education Board, Atlanta
Brophy S, Klein S, Portsmore M, Rogers C (2008) Advancing engineering education in K-12 classrooms. J Eng Educ 97(3):369–387
Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18(1):32–42
Cobb P, Bowers J (1999) Cognitive and situated learning perspective in theory and practice. Educ Res 28(2):4–15
Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159
Cunningham CM, Hester K (2007). Engineering is elementary: an engineering and technology curriculum for children. Presented at the ASEE annual conference and exposition, Honolulu, HI
Dym CL, Agogino A, Eris O, Frey DD, Leifer LJ (2005) Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. J Eng Educ. doi:10.1109/EMR.2006.1679078
Embretson SE, Reise SP (2000) Item response theory for psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah
Fortus D, Dershimer RC, Krajcik J, Marx RW, Mamlok-Naaman R (2004) Design-based science and student learning. J Res Sci Teach 41(10):1081–1110. doi:10.1002/tea.20040
Greeno JG (1997) On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educ Res 26(1):5–17
Guzey SS, Tank K, Wang H, Roehrig G, Moore T (2014a) A high-quality professional development for teachers of grades 3-6 for implementing engineering into classrooms. Sch Sci Math 114(3):139–149
Guzey SS, Moore T, Harwell M (2014b) Development of an instrument to measure students’ attitudes toward STEM. Sch Sci Math 114(6):271–279
Harwell M, Philips A, Mareno M, Guzey SS, Moore T (2015) A study of STEM assessments in Engineering, Science, and Mathematics Assessments for elementary and middle school students. Sch Sci Math 115(2):66–74
Hmelo C, Douglas H, Kolodner J (2000) Designing to learn complex systems. J Learn Sci 9(3):247–298. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS0903
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (2007) TIMSS 2007 assessment frameworks. TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College, MA. Retrieved from http://timss.bc.edu/timss2007/frameworks.html
Kolodner JL, Camp PJ, Crismond D, Fasse B, Gray J, Holbrook J, Ryan M (2003) Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle schools science classroom: putting learning by design™ into practice. J Learn Sci 12(4):495–547
Lachapelle CP, Cunningham CM (2014) Engineering in elementary schools. In: Purzer S, Strobel J, Cardella M (eds) Engineering in pre-college settings: synthesizing research, policy, and practices. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, pp 61–88
Lachapelle CP, Cunningham CM, Jocz J, Kay AE, Phadnis P, Wertheimer J, Arteaga R (2011) Engineering is Elementary: an evaluation of years 4 through 6 field testing. Museum of Science, Boston, MA
Mehalik MM, Doppelt Y, Schuun CD (2008) Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: better overall science concept learning. J Eng Educ 97(January):71–85
Miller MC (1966) Simultaneous statistical inference. McGraw-Hill, New York
Moore TJ, Stohlmann MS, Wang H-H, Tank KM, Glancy AW, Roehrig GH (2014) Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In: Strobel J, Purzer S, Cardella M (eds) Engineering in precollege settings: synthesizing research, policy, and practices. Purdue University Press, Lafayette, IN
National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council (2014) STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. The National Academies Press, Washington
National Center for Education Statistics (2010) An introduction to NAEP. U.S. Department of Education, Washington. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/parents/2010468.pdf
National Research Council (2009) Engineering in K-12 education: understanding the status and improving the prospects. The National Academies Press, Washington
National Research Council (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press, Washington
Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models, 4th edn. Irwin, Chicago
NGSS Lead States (2013) Next generation science standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington
Osborne JF, Simon S, Collins S (2003) Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. Int J Sci Educ 25(9):1049–1079
Pedhazur EJ, Schmelkin LP (1991) Measurement, design, and analysis: an integrated approach. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Penner D, Lehrer R, Schauble L (1998) From physical models to biomechanics: a design-based modeling approach. J Learn Sci 7(3&4):429–449. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0703&4_6
Rethwisch DG, Starobin SS, Laanan FS, Schenk MT Jr (2012) A study of the impact of project lead the way on achievement outcomes in Iowa. Proc Am Soc Eng Educ (ASEE) 2012:1–21
Riskowski JL, Todd CD, Wee B, Dark M, Harbor J (2009) Exploring the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary water resources engineering module in eighth grade science course. Int J Eng Educ 25(1):181–195
Roth W (1996) Art and artifact of children’s designing: a situated cognition perspective. J Learn Sci 5(2):129–166
Sadler PM, Coyle HP, Schwartz M (2000) Engineering competitions in the middle school classrooms: key elements in developing affective design challenges. J Learn Sci 9(3):299–324
Schnittka CG (2012) Engineering education in the science classroom: a case study of one teacher’s disparate approach with ability-tracked classrooms. J Pre-College Eng Educ Res 2(1):35–48
Schnittka CG, Bell RL (2011) Engineering design and conceptual change in the middle school science classroom. Int J Sci Educ 33:1861–1887
Sijtsma K (2009) On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika 74(1):107–120
Silk EM, Schunn CD, Strand Cary M (2009) The impact of an engineering design curriculum on science reasoning in an urban setting. J Sci Educ Technol 18(3):209–223
Simpson RD, Oliver SJ (1990) A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Sci Educ 74(1):1–18
Soper D (2015) The free statistics calculators website (v.3.0). Retried from http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc3/
Tran NA, Nathan MJ (2010) Pre-college engineering studies: an investigation of the relationship between pre-college engineering studies and student achievement in science and mathematics. J Eng Educ 99(2):143–157
Wendell K, Rogers C (2013) Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. J Eng Educ 102(4):513–540. doi:10.1002/jee.20026
Winsteps and Rasch measurement Software (2010) A user’s guide to Insteps Minister Rash-model computer programs. Retrieved from http://www.winsteps.com/winman/index.htm?diagnosingmisfit.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guzey, S.S., Moore, T.J., Harwell, M. et al. STEM Integration in Middle School Life Science: Student Learning and Attitudes. J Sci Educ Technol 25, 550–560 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9612-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9612-x