Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Communicating Science to Impact Learning? A Phenomenological Inquiry into 4th and 5th Graders’ Perceptions of Science Information Sources

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rooted in science education and science communication studies, this study examines 4th and 5th grade students’ perceptions of science information sources (SIS) and their use in communicating science to students. It combines situated learning theory with uses and gratifications theory in a qualitative phenomenological analysis. Data were gathered through classroom observations and interviews in four Turkish elementary schools. Focus group interviews with 47 students and individual interviews with 17 teachers and 10 parents were conducted. Participants identified a wide range of SIS, including TV, magazines, newspapers, internet, peers, teachers, families, science centers/museums, science exhibitions, textbooks, science books, and science camps. Students reported using various SIS in school-based and non-school contexts to satisfy their cognitive, affective, personal, and social integrative needs. SIS were used for science courses, homework/project assignments, examination/test preparations, and individual science-related research. Students assessed SIS in terms of the perceived accessibility of the sources, the quality of the content, and the content presentation. In particular, some sources such as teachers, families, TV, science magazines, textbooks, and science centers/museums (“directive sources”) predictably led students to other sources such as teachers, families, internet, and science books (“directed sources”). A small number of sources crossed context boundaries, being useful in both school and out. Results shed light on the connection between science education and science communication in terms of promoting science learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abruscato J (1992) Teaching children science, 3rd edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainley M, Ainley J (2011) Student engagement with science in early adolescence: the contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemp Educ Psychol 36(1):4–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubusson P, Griffin J, Kearney M (2012) Learning beyond the classroom: Implications for school science. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin K, McRobbie C (eds) Second international handbook of science education. Springer, NY, pp 1123–1134

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bell P, Lewenstein B, Shouse AW, Feder MA (eds) (2009) Learning science in informal environments: people, places, and pursuits. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler J, Katz E (eds) (1974) The uses of mass communications. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford JD, Brown A, Cocking R (2000) How people learn: mind, brain, experience and school, expanded edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18(1):34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubela T, Nisbet MC, Borchelt R, Brunger F, Critchley C, Einsiedel E, Caulfield T (2009) Science communication reconsidered. Nat Biotechnol 27(6):514–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt S, Clery E, Abeywardana V, Phillips M (2010) Wellcome trust monitor 1. Wellcome Trust, London. Retrieved from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@msh_grants/documents/web_document/wtx058862.pdf

  • Caravita S (1987) Communicating science to public. CIBA Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspe M, Lopez ME, Wolos C (2007) Family involvement in elementary school children’s education. Family involvement makes a difference. Number 2, Winter 2006/2007. Harvard Family Research Project

  • Creswell JW (1998) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2012) Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 4th edn. Pearson Education International, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley K, Galco J (2001) Family conversations and the emergence of scientific literacy. In: Crowley K, Schunn C, Okada T (eds) Designing for science: implications from everyday, classroom, and professional science. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 393–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhingra (2012) Science stories on television. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin K, McRobbie C (eds) Second international handbook of science education. Springer, NY, pp 1135–1147

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dierking LD (2005) Lessons without limit: how free-choice learning is transforming science and technology education. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos 12:145–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierking LD, Falk JH (2003) Optimizing out-of-school time: the role of free-choice learning. New Dir Youth Dev 97:75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikmenli M, Çardak O, Oztas F (2009) Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey. Int J Environ Sci Educ 4(4):429–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon J (2012) Science, the environment and education beyond the classroom. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin K, McRobbie CJ (eds) Second international handbook of science education. Springer, New York, pp 1081–1095

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Driver R, Leach J, Millar R, Scott P (1996) Young people’s images of science. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunwoody S (2008) Science journalism. In: Bucchi M, Trench B (eds) Handbook of public communication of science and technology. Routledge, NY, pp 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl RA, Schweingruber HA, Shouse AW (eds) (2007) Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk JH, Dierking LD (2010) The 95 percent solution. Am Sci 98(6):486–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk JH, Storksdieck M, Dierking LD (2007) Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Underst Sci 16(4):455–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk JH, Randol S, Dierking LD (2008) The informal science education landscape: a preliminary investigation. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://caise.insci.org/uploads/docs/2008_CAISE_Landscape_Study_Report.pdf

  • Fender JG, Crowley K (2007) How parent explanation changes what children learn from everyday scientific thinking. J Appl Dev Psychol 28:189–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenichel M, Schweingruber HA (2010) Surrounded by science: learning science in informal environments. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12614

  • Friedman S, Dunwoody S, Rogers C (1986) Scientists and journalists: reporting science as news. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan MG (1993) Why teachers must become change agents. Educ Leadersh 50:12

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelmez-Burakgazi S (2012) Connecting science communication to science education: A phenomenological inquiry into multimodal science information sources among 4th and 5th graders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara

  • Gelmez-Burakgazi S, Yildirim A (2013) Accessing science through media: uses and gratifications among fourth and fifth graders for science learning. Sci Commun 36(2):168–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakverdi-Can M, Dana TM (2012) Exemplary science teachers’ use of technology. Tojet 11(1):94

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning PH (2000) Everyday cognition and situated learning. In: Jonassen DH (ed) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 143–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook N, Brake M (2010) Science in popular culture. In: Brake M, Weitkamp E (eds) Introducing science communication. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 29–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan JB (2006) The internet as a resource for news and information about science. Retrieved from Internet and American Life Project website: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/12-Wireless-Internet-Use.aspx

  • Katz E, Haas H, Gurevitch M (1973) On the use of the mass media for important things. Am Sociol Rev 38(2):164–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz E, Blumler JG, Gurevitch M (1974) Uses and gratifications research. Public Opin Q 37(4):509–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger RA (1994) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger D (1988) An introduction to phenomenological psychology, 2nd edn. Juta, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Singh SN, Yadav AK (2011) An investigation of use of information sources by social scientists. Libr Philos Pract (e-journal) 585–596

  • Leonard DC (2002) Learning theories. Greenwood Press, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewenstein Bruce V (2001) Who produces science information for the public? In: Falk John, Donovan Elizabeth, Woods Rosalie (eds) Free-choice science education: how we learn science outside of schools. Teachers College Press, New York, pp 21–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewenstein Bruce V (2009) Where do books fit in the information age? In: Holliman Richard, Thomas Jeffrey, Schmidt Sam, Scanlon Eileen, Whitelegg Elizabeth (eds) Practising science communication in the information age: theorising professional practices. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 151–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall MN (1996) Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract 13(6):522–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis JR, Hestness E, Riedinger K, Katz P, Marbach-Ad G, Dai A (2012) Informal science education in formal science teacher preparation. In: Lederman NG, Abell SK (eds) Second international handbook of science education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1097–1108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RW (1987) Fact and method: explanation, confirmation and reality in the natural and the social sciences. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustakas C (1994) Phenomenological research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2007) Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board (2004) Science and engineering indicators: 2004. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrete A, Lartigue C (2004) Learning from education to communicate science as a good story. Endeavour 28(3):120–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin D (1995) Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. W.H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • NFER (2011) Exploring young people`s views on science education. Wellcome Trust, London

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD Better Life Index (2013) Retrieved from http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/countries/turkey/

  • Patton M (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie LJ (2007) Learning science outside of school. In: Abell SK, Lederman NG (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Psychology Press, New York, pp 125–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieh SY, Hilligoss B (2008) College students’ credibility judgments in the information-seeking process. In: Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ (eds) Digital media, youth, and credibility. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 49–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouet JF (2006) The skills of document use: from text comprehension to web-based learning. Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Rounds J (2004) Strategies for the curiosity-driven museum visitor. Curator 47(4):389–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society Report (2008) Exploring the relationship between socioeconomic status and participation and attainment in science education. SES and Education Report. Retrieved from http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/Influencing_Policy/Education/Reports/SES_report_Jun_08_pdf

  • SAGEM (2008) Internet kullanımı ve aile araştırması raporu. Retrieved from Republic of Turkey Ministry of Family and Social Policy website: http://www.aile.gov.tr/tr/

  • Segev E, Baram-Tsabari A (2012) Seeking science information online: data mining Google to better understand the roles of the media and the education system. Public Underst Sci 21(7):813–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn N, Gorard S, Furlong J (2006) Adult learning in the digital age. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocklmayer S, Gore M, Bryant C (2001) Science communication in theory and practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trench B (2008a) Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. In: Cheng D, Claessens M, Gascoigne T, Metcalfe J, Schiele B, Shi S (eds) Communicating science in social contexts: new models, new practices. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 119–135

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trench B (2008b) Internet: turning science communication inside out? In: Bucchi M, Trench B (eds) Handbook of public communication of science and technology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 185–198

    Google Scholar 

  • TUIK (2013) Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri kullanım araştırması. Retrieved from Turkish Statistical Institute website: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=13569

  • Vosniadou S, Ioannides C, Dimitrakopoulou A, Papademetriou E (2001) Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learn Instr 11(4):381–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warden R (2010) The internet and science communication: blurring the boundaries. E-cancer 4(203):203–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley J, Goldman SR, Graesser AC, Sanchez CA, Ash IK, Hemmerich JA (2009) Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. Am Educ Res J 46(4):1060–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson BB, Myers KM (2000) Situated cognition in theoretical and practical context. In: Jonassen D, Land S (eds) Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway, pp 57–88

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Report (2011) Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDRS/Resources/WDR2011_Full_Text.pdf

  • Yildirim A, Şimşek H (2008) Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri, 4th edn. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    Sevinc Gelmez Burakgazi

  2. Department of Educational Sciences, Middle East Technical University Northern Cyprus Campus (METU NCC), Güzelyurt, Cyprus

    Ali Yildirim

  3. Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, USA

    Noah Weeth Feinstein

Authors
  1. Sevinc Gelmez Burakgazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Yildirim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Noah Weeth Feinstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sevinc Gelmez Burakgazi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gelmez Burakgazi, S., Yildirim, A. & Weeth Feinstein, N. Communicating Science to Impact Learning? A Phenomenological Inquiry into 4th and 5th Graders’ Perceptions of Science Information Sources. J Sci Educ Technol 25, 244–262 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9590-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9590-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation