Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Teaching Science Through the Language of Students in Technology-Enhanced Instruction

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines whether and how tapping into students’ everyday language in a web-based learning environment can improve all students’ science learning in linguistically heterogeneous classrooms. A total of 220 fifth-grade English Language Learners (ELLs) and their non-ELL peers were assigned to either an everyday English approach condition or a textbook approach condition, and completed technology-enhanced instruction focusing on respiration and photosynthesis. Students in the everyday English approach condition were taught the concepts in everyday, conversational English before content-specific scientific terms were introduced, while students in the textbook approach condition were taught the same concepts and vocabulary simultaneously. The results show that the everyday English approach was significantly more effective in helping both ELLs and non-ELL students develop a coherent understanding of abstract concepts related to photosynthesis and respiration. Students in the everyday English approach condition were also better able to link content-specific terms to their understanding of the concepts. These findings show the potential advantage of using students’ everyday English as a resource to make science more accessible to linguistically diverse students in mainstream classrooms. By integrating students’ everyday language in science instruction, it is possible for all students including ELLs to acquire both the content and language of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abedi J, Hofstetter CH, Lord C (2004) Assessment accommodations for English language learners: implications for policy-based empirical research. Rev Educ Res 74(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989) Science for all Americans. (Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology). Washington, DC, AAAS

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993) Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardac D, Akaygun S (2004) Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students’ understanding of chemical change. J Res Sci Teach 41(4):317–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • August D, Carlo M, Dressler C, Snow C (2005) The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learn Disabil Res Pract 20(1):50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett M, Wagner H, Gatling A, Anderson J, Houle M, Kafka A (2006) The impact of science fiction film on student understanding of science. J Sci Educ Technol 15(2):179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake M, Sickle M (2001) Helping linguistically diverse students share what they know. J Adolesc Adult Lit 44:468–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown B, Ryoo K (2008) Teaching science as a language: a "content-first" approach to science teaching. J Res Sci Teach 45(5):529–553

  • Brown B, Ryoo K, Rodriguez J (2010) Pathway towards fluency: using ‘disaggregate instruction’ to promote science literacy. Int J Sci Educ 32(11):1465–1493

  • Brown BA, Spang E (2008) Double talk: synthesizing everyday and science language in the classroom. Sci Educ 92(4):708–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunch GC (2006) “Academic English” in the 7th grade: broadening the lens, expanding access. J Engl Acad Purp 5:284–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler FA, Bailey AL, Stevens R, Huang B, Lord C (2004) Academic English in fifth-grade mathematics, science, and social studies textbooks (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 642). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)

  • Campbell AE, Davis GE, Adams VM (2007) Cognitive demands and second-language learners: a framework for analyzing mathematics instructional contexts. Math Think Learn 9(1):3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo M, August D, McLaughlin B, Snow C, Dressler C, Lippman D, Lively T, White C (2004) Closing the gap: addressing the vocabulary needs of English language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Read Res Q 39(2):188–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb P, diSessa A, Lehrer R, Schauble L (2003) Design experiments in educational research. Educ Res 32(1):9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coolidge-Stoltz E, Jenner J, Pasachoff J, Cronkite D, Wysession M (2008) Prentice Hall Focus on Life Science. California Edition

  • Cuevas P, Lee O, Hart J, Deaktor R (2005) Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. J Res Sci Teach 42(3):337–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins J (1980) The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Q 14:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins J (2003) BICS and CALP. In: Cummins J (ed) Bilingual education. http://www.iteachilearn.com/cummins/bicscalp.html, University of Toronto

  • Durán RP (2008) Assessing English-language learners’ achievement. Rev Res Educ 32(1):292–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran BJ, Dugan T, Weffer R (1998) Language minority students in high school: the role of language in learning biology concepts. Sci Educ 82(3):311–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria J, Short D (2004) Using multiple perspectives in observations of diverse classrooms: the sheltered instruction observation protocol (SIOP). In: Waxman H, Tharp R, Hilberg RS (eds) Observational research in U.S. classrooms: new approaches for understanding cultural and linguistic diversity. Cambridge University Press, Boston, pp 21–47

  • Fang Z (2005) Scientific literacy: a systemic functional linguistics perspective. Sci Educ 89(2):335–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Z (2006) The language demands of science reading in middle school. Int J Sci Educ 28(5):491–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee JP (1992) The social mind: language, ideology, and social practice. Bergin & Garvey, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee JP (2005) Language in the science classroom: academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In Yerrick R, Roth W-M (eds) Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: multiple voices of teaching and learning research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 19–37

  • Hakuta K, Butler YG, Witt D (2000) How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute Policy Report 2000-1. University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen JA, Barnett M, MaKinster JG (2004) The impact of three-dimensional computational modeling on student understanding of astronomy concepts: a quantitative analysis. Int J Sci Educ 26(11):1365–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd PD, Robinson JT, McConnell MC, Ross NM Jr (1981) The status of middle and junior high school science, volume I and summary report, volume II technical report. Louisville, CO: Center for Educational Research and Evaluation, BSCS

  • Kelly G, Breton T (2001) Framing science as disciplinary inquiry in bilingual classrooms. Electron J Lit Through Sci 1(1):1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee O (2005) Science education and English language learners: synthesis and research agenda. Rev Educ Res 75(4):491–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee O, Fradd SH (1998) Science for All, including students from non English language backgrounds. Educ Res 27(4):12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee O, Fradd SH (2002) Instructional congruence to promote science learning and literacy development for linguistically diverse students. In: Models of science teacher preparation. Springer, Netherlands, pp 109–126

  • Lemke JL (1990) Talking science: language, learning, and values. Ablex, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu OL, Lee HS, Hofstetter C, Linn MC (2008) Assessing knowledge integration in science: construct, measures and evidence. Educ Assess 13(1):33–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukyx A, Lee O (2007) Measuring instructional congruence in elementary science classrooms: pedagogical and methodological components of a theoretical framework. J Res Sci Teach 44(3):424–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markic S, Broggy J, Childs P (2013) How to deal with linguistic issues in chemistry classes. In: Teaching chemistry–a studybook. SensePublishers, pp 127–152

  • McKeown MG, Beck IL, Omanson RC, Perfetti CA (1983) The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: a replication. J Liter Res 15(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moje E, Collazo T, Carrillo R, Marx RW (2001) “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. J Res Sci Teach 38(4):469–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy WE, Townsend D (2012) Words as tools: learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Read Res Q 47:91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (2011) The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2009 (Report No. NCES 2011– 451). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education

  • National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennock-Roman M, Rivera C (2011) Mean effects of test accommodations for ELLs and Non-ELLs: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Educ Meas Issues Pract 30(3):10–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivard LP, Straw SB (2000) The effect of talk and writing on learning science: an exploratory study. Sci Educ 84:566–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez I, Bethel LJ (1983) An inquiry approach to science and language teaching. J Res Sci Teach 20(4):291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosebery AS, Warren B, Conant FR (1992) Appropriating scientific discourse: findings from language minority classrooms. J Learn Sci 21:61–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein-Ávila E, Johnson J (2008) Meaningful content for middle school students for whom English is an additional language. In: Hinchman KA, Sheridan-Thomas K (eds) Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction. Guilford Publications Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryoo K (2011) Teaching science through the language of students in technology-enhanced instruction. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans, LA, Apr 2011

  • Ryoo K, Linn MC (2012) Can dynamic visualizations improve middle school students’ understanding of energy in photosynthesis? J Res Sci Teach 49(2):218–243

  • Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: a conceptual framework (Technical Report No. 2003-1):The University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute

  • Schleppegrell M (2001) Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguist Educ 12(4):431–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleppegrell M (2004) The language of schooling: a functional linguistics perspective. Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoerning E (2013) The effect of plain-English vocabulary on student achievement and classroom culture in college science instruction. Int J Sci Math Educ 1–21

  • Songer NB, Linn MC (1991) How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration? J Res Sci Teach 28(9):761–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer BH, Guillaume AM (2006) Integrating curriculum through the learning cycle: content-based reading and vocabulary instruction. Read Teach 60(3):206–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller J (1994) Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn Instr 4(4):295–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller J, Van Merrienboer JJ, Paas FG (1998) Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev 10(3):251–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas WP, Collier VP (2002) A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz, CA, and Washington, DC: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence

  • Varelas M, Pappas CC, Rife A (2006) Exploring the role of intertextuality in concept construction: urban second-graders make sense of evaporation, boiling, and condensation. J Res Sci Teach 43:637–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren B, Ballenger C, Ogonowski M, Rosebery A, Hudicourt-Barnes J (2001) Rethinking diversity in learning science: the logic of everyday language. J Res Sci Teach 38(5):529–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RE (1983) The importance of terminology in teaching K-12 science. J Res Sci Teach 20:577–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 309E Peabody Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3500, USA

    Kihyun Ryoo

Authors
  1. Kihyun Ryoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kihyun Ryoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryoo, K. Teaching Science Through the Language of Students in Technology-Enhanced Instruction. J Sci Educ Technol 24, 29–42 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9518-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9518-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation