Abstract
Universities in Taiwan can be divided into two major categories of comprehensive universities and technological universities. Students studying engineering majors in comprehensive universities are often recruited from academic high schools while those in technological universities tend to be recruited from vocational high schools. The purpose of this research was to investigate differences in learning efficacy between college students with academic backgrounds and those with vocational backgrounds. Results indicated no significant differences in cognition between the two groups of students. Additionally, students with vocational school backgrounds performed better in comprehension skills compared with those with academic backgrounds and were more able to apply acquired knowledge to practical tasks according to path analysis studies and the Mann–Whitney U test.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chowdhury BH (2004) Learning to learn-concepts in a first power engineering course. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(1):31–39
Gadbow NF (2001) Teaching strategies that help learners with different needs. Adult Learn 12(2):19+
Geddam A (2003) Mechatronics for engineering education: undergraduate curriculum. Int J Engg Ed 19(4):575–580
Gupta SK, Kumar S, Tewari L (2003) A design-oriented undergraduate curriculum in mechatronics education. Int J Engg Ed 19(4):563-568
Johnson L, Smith R, Smythe T, Varon R (2009) Challenge-based learning: an approach for our time. The New Media Consortium, Austin
Jou M, Chuang CP, Lai SH (2010) Development of a mechatronic skill’s scale to evaluate students learning achievement. Presented at the IGIP-SEFI 2010—joint international IGIP-SEFI annual conference 2010, Trnava, Slovakia
Lynch MM (2002) The online educator: a guide to creating the virtual classroom. Routledge Falmer, London
Nicholas H, Ng W (2012) Factors influencing the uptake of a mechatronics curriculum initiative in five Australian secondary schools. Int J Technol Des Ed 22(1):65-90
Rogers GG (2003) The teaching philosophy of the REAL units of a mechatronic engineering degree program. Int J Engg Ed 19(4):515-518
Simpson E (1966) The classification of educational objectives, psychomotor domain. U.S. Department of Education, BR-5-0090
Simpson E (1976) The home as a learning center for vocational development. Occasional Paper No. 16, Ohio State University
Simpson E (1981) What people will need to know in the 80s and beyond to be intelligent consumers and effective homemakers. National Institution of Education, NIE-P-80-044
Statistical summaries (2014) Ministry of Education, Taiwan. https://stats.moe.gov.tw/. Retrieved 22 July 2014
Acknowledgments
The authors of this study gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the National Science Council of Taiwan, under the Grant No. NSC96-2516-S-003-003-MY3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jou, M., Hung, CK. & Lai, SH. A Comparative Investigation on the Learning Efficacy of Mechatronic Technology Between Academic and Vocational High School Students. J Sci Educ Technol 23, 777–783 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9511-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9511-y