Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teachers’ Concerns About Biotechnology Education

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impacts of biotechnology are found in nearly all sectors of society from health care and food products to environmental issues and energy sources. Despite the significance of biotechnology within the sciences, it has not become a prominent trend in science education. In this study, we seek to more fully identify biology teachers’ concerns about biotechnology instruction and their reported practices. Consistent with the Stages of Concern framework as modified by Hord et al., we investigated teachers’ awareness, informational, personal, management, consequences, collaboration, and refocusing concerns about biotechnology teaching by employing a qualitative design that allowed for the emergence of teachers’ ideas. Twenty high school life science teachers attending a biotechnology institute were interviewed using an interview protocol specifically designed to target various Stages of Concern. Although the Stages of Concern framework guided the development of interview questions in order to target a wide range of concerns, data analysis employed a grounded theory approach wherein patterns emerged from teachers’ own words and were constantly compared with each other to generate larger themes. Our results have potential to provide guidance for professional development providers and curriculum developers committed to supporting initial implementation of biotechnology education. Recommendations include supporting teacher development of biotechnology content knowledge; promoting strategies for obtaining, storing and managing biotechnology equipment and materials; providing opportunities for peer teaching as a means of building teacher confidence; and highlighting career opportunities in biotechnology and the intersections of biotechnology and everyday life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson SE (1997) Understanding teacher change: revisiting the concerns based adoption model. Curriculum Inq 27:331–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey DB, Palsha SA (1992) Qualities of the Stages of Concern Questionnaire and implications for educational innovations. J Educ Res 85:226–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigler AM, Hanegan NL (2011) Student content knowledge increases after participation in a hands-on biotechnology intervention. J Sci Educ Technol 20:246–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DC, Kemp MC, Hall J (1998) On teaching biotechnology in Kentucky. J Ind Teach Educ 35(4):44–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce T, Gray D (2004) Tough acts to follow: the challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress. Int J Sci Educ 26:717–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Raffan J (1999) Biotechnology: students’ knowledge and attitudes in the UK and Taiwan. J Biol Educ 34:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung D, Hattie J, Ng D (2001) Reexamining the Stages of Concern Questionnaire: a test of alternative models. J Educ Res 94:226–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahm AS (2005) The role of professional graduate degrees in meeting current and future biotechnology industry workforce needs. J Biotechnol 118:S186

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson V (2007) An exploration of high school (12–17 year old) students’ understandings of, and attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Res Sci Educ 37:59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson V, Schibeci R (2003) Western Australian school students’ understanding of biotechnology. Int J Sci Educ 25:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson V, Soames C (2006) The effect of biotechnology education on Australian high school students’ understandings and attitudes about biotechnology processes. Res Sci Technol Educ 24:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dori YJ, Tal RT, Tsaushu M (2003) Teaching biotechnology through case studies—can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors? Sci Educ 87:767–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett S (2009) Professional development for the integration of biotechnology education. Unpublished masters of education thesis, Queensland University of Technology

  • Gunter B, Kinderler J, Beyleveld D (1998) Teenagers and biotechnology: a survey of understanding and opinion in Britain. Stud Sci Educ 32:81–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall GE, Loucks S (1978) Teacher concerns as a basis for facilitating and personalizing staff development. Teach Coll Rec 80:36–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanegan NL, Bigler A (2009) Infusing authentic inquiry into biotechnology. J Sci Educ Technol 18:393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hord SM, Rutherford WL, Huling-Austin L, Hall GE (1987) Taking charge of change. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidman G (2010) What is an ‘interesting curriculum’ for biotechnology education? Students and teachers opposing views. Res Sci Educ 40:353–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klop T, Severiens S, Knippels M, van Mil MHW, Ten Dam GTM (2010) Effects of a science education module on attitudes towards modern biotechnology of secondary school students. Int J Sci Educ 32:1127–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon H, Change M (2009) Technology teachers’ beliefs about biotechnology and its instruction in South Korea. J Technol Stud 35:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie G, Schibeci R (2003) What do science teachers think biotechnology is? Does it matter? Aust Sci Teach J 49(3):16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock R, Miles C (1993) Biotechnology and genetic engineering: students’ knowledge and attitudes. J Biol Educ 27:267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell JA (2010) Using numbers in qualitative research. Qual Inq 16:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael M, Grinyer A, Turner J (1997) Teaching biotechnology: identity in the context of ignorance and knowledgeability. Public Underst Sci 6:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreland J, Jones A, Cowie B (2006) Developing pedagogical content knowledge for the new sciences: the example of biotechnology. Teach Educ 17:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2009) A New Biology for the 21st Century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

  • National Research Council (2011) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas (advance copy). National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsher G, Dreyfus A (1999) Biotechnologies as a context for enhancing junior high-school students’ ability to ask meaningful questions about abstract biological processes. Int J Sci Educ 21:137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozel A, Terzi I, Ozel E (2009) Awareness of biological application: a study among university geography students. Education 129:714–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokop P, Leskova A, Kubiatko M, Diran C (2007) Slovakian students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward biotechnology. Int J Sci Educ 29:895–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicks M, Stoebner T, Hassel C, Carr T (1996) Evaluation of a decision case approach to food biotechnology education at the secondary level. J Nutr Educ 28:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott DG, Washer BA, Wright MD (2006) A Delphi study to identify recommended biotechnology competencies for first-year/initially certified technology education teachers. J Technol Educ 17:43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele F, Aubusson P (2004) The challenge in teaching biotechnology. Res Sci Educ 34:365–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Thieman WJ, Palladino MA (2003) Introduction to biotechnology. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkmen L, Darcin ES (2007) A comparative study of Turkish elementary and science education major students’ knowledge levels at the popular biotechnological issues. Int J Environ Sci Educ 2:125–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller MF (1994) Biotechnology in the high school biology curriculum: the future is here! Am Biol Teach 56:460–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa A. Borgerding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borgerding, L.A., Sadler, T.D. & Koroly, M.J. Teachers’ Concerns About Biotechnology Education. J Sci Educ Technol 22, 133–147 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9382-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9382-z

Keywords

Navigation