Abstract
We consider the d-dimensional Anderson model, and we prove the density of states is locally analytic if the single site potential distribution is locally analytic and the disorder is large. We employ the random walk expansion of resolvents and a simple complex function theory trick. In particular, we discuss the uniform distribution case, and we obtain a sharper result using more precise computations. The method can be also applied to prove the analyticity of the correlation functions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bellissard, J., Hislop, P.: Smoothness of correlations in the Anderson model at high disorder. Ann. Henri Poincaré 8, 1–26 (2007)
Bovier, A., Campanino, M., Klein, A., Perez, J.F.: Smoothness of the density of states in the Anderson model at high disorder. Commun. Math. Phys. 114, 439–461 (1988)
Campanino, M., Klein, A.: A supersymmetric transfer matrix and differentiability of the density of states in the one-dimensional Anderson model. Commun. Math. Phys. 104, 227–241 (1986)
Carmona, R., Lacroix, J.: Spectral Theory of Random Schrödinger Operators. Birkhäuser, Boston (1990)
Constantinescu, F., Fröhlich, J., Spencer, T.: Analyticity of the density of states and replica method for random Schrödinger operators on a lattice. J. Stat. Phys. 34(3/4), 571–596 (1984)
Cycon, H., Froese, R., Kirsch, W., Simon, B.: Schrödinger Operators. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer, Berlin (1985)
Delyon, F., Souillard, B.: Remark on the continuity of the density of states of ergodic finite difference operators. Commun. Math. Phys. 94, 289–291 (1984)
Demuth, M., Krishna, M.: Determining Spectra in Quantum Theory. Progress in Mathematical Physics, vol. 44. Birkhäuser, Boston (2005)
Figotin, A., Pastur, L.: Spectra of Random and Almost-Periodic Operators. Springer, Berlin (1992)
Fröhlich, J., Spencer, T.: A rigorous approach to Anderson localization. In: Common Trends in Particle and Condensed Matter Physics, Les Houches, 1983. Phys. Rep. 103, 9–25 (1984)
Glaffig, C.: Smoothness of the integrated density of states on strips. J. Funct. Anal. 92, 509–534 (1990)
Klein, A., Speis, A.: Smoothness of the density of states in the Anderson model on a one-dimensional strip. Ann. Phys. 183, 352–398 (1988)
Klein, A., Speis, A.: Regularity of the invariant measure and of the density of states in the one-dimensional Anderson model. J. Funct. Anal. 88, 211–227 (1990)
Klein, A., Lacroix, J., Speis, A.: Regularity of the density of states in the Anderson model on a strip for potentials with singular continuous distributions. J. Stat. Phys. 57(1/2), 65–88 (1989)
Pastur, L.: Spectral properties of disordered systems in one-body approximation. Commun. Math. Phys. 75, 179–196 (1980)
Simon, B., Taylor, M.: Harmonic analysis on SL(n,ℝ) and smoothness of the density of states in the one-dimensional Anderson model. Commun. Math. Phys. 101, 1–19 (1985)
Veselić, I.: Lipschitz-continuity of the integrated density of states for Gaussian random potentials. Lett. Math. Phys. 97, 25–27 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
S. Nakamura was partially supported by JSPS Grant Kiban (A) 21244008.
Appendix
Appendix
We define the correlation function K(e 1,e 2) here. Given a pair of vectors f,g∈ℓ 2(ℤd) and any self adjoint operator A, we see that the limits
exist for almost every λ with respect to the Lebesgue measure, by using Theorem 1.4.16 [8] and polarization identity to write the finite complex measure 〈f,E A (⋅)g〉 as a linear combination of the positive finite measures
Thus the function r(E)=〈f,δ(H−E)g〉 gives the density of the measure 〈f,E A (⋅)g〉 almost every E. Similarly computing (and justifying the exchange of \({\mathbb{E}}\) and the integrals with respect to λ 1,λ 2, by Fubini),
where μ is the finite complex correlation measure
As in the proof of Theorem 1.4.16 [8], we can show that the limits
exist for almost every (e 1,e 2)∈ℝ2. Now note that the complex valued function
of two complex variables is analytic in a neighborhood of (e 1,e 2) if and only if it is analytic as a function of the real variables (e 1,e 2). Therefore in the proof of Theorem 4 we consider the function
and show it is analytic in the region stated in the theorem.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaminaga, M., Krishna, M. & Nakamura, S. A Note on the Analyticity of Density of States. J Stat Phys 149, 496–504 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-012-0603-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-012-0603-x