Skip to main content
Log in

Recent development of the earthquake strong motion-intensity catalog and intensity prediction equations for Iran

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to develop a new earthquake strong motion-intensity catalog as well as intensity prediction equations for Iran based on the available data. For this purpose, all the sites which had both recorded strong motion and intensity values throughout the region were first searched. Then, the data belonging to the 306 identified sites were processed, and the results were compiled as a new strong motion-intensity catalog. Based on this new catalog, two empirical equations between the values of intensity and the ground motion parameters (GMPs) for the Iranian earthquakes were calculated. At the first step, earthquake “intensity” was considered as a function of five independent GMPs including “Log (PHA),” “moment magnitude (MW),” “distance to epicenter,” “site type,” and “duration,” and a multiple stepwise regression was calculated. Regarding the correlations between the parameters and the effectiveness coefficients of the predictors, the Log (PHA) was recognized as the most effective parameter on the earthquake “intensity,” while the parameter “site type” was removed from the equations since it was determines as the least significant variable. Then, at the second step, a simple ordinary least squares (OLS) regression was fitted only between the parameters intensity and the Log (PHA) which resulted in more over/underestimated intensity values comparing to the results of the multiple intensity-GMPs regression. However, for rapid response purposes, the simple OLS regression may be more useful comparing to the multiple regression due to its data availability and simplicity. In addition, according to 50 selected earthquakes, an empirical relation between the macroseismic intensity (I0) and MW was developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akkar S, Kale O, Ansari A, Durgaryan R, Gündoğan AA, Hamzehloo H, Harmandar E, Tsereteli N, Waseem M, Yazjeen T (2014) EMME strong‐motion database serving for predictive model selection to EMME ground‐motion logic‐tree applications. Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, İstanbul, Turkey

  • Ambraseys, N., (1975) The correlation of intensity with ground motion. In: Proc. 14th Conf. Europ. Seism. Comm., Trieste, Bull. Europ. Comm. Earthq. Eng., 1: 335–341

  • Atkinson G.M., Kaka S.I. (2006) Relationships between felt intensity and instrumental ground motion for New-Madrid Shakemaps, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6

  • Atkinson GM, Kaka SI (2007) Relationships between felt intensity and instrumental ground motion in the Central United States and California. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 97(4):1350–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faenza L, Michelini L (2010) Regression analysis of MCS intensity and ground motion parameters in Italy and its application in ShakeMap. Geophys J Int 180:1138–1152. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04467.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccioli, E. &Cauzzi, C., 2006 Macroseismic intensities for seismic scenarios, estimated from instrumentally based correlations, in Abstract Book 1st ECEES, http://www.ecees.org/abstracts_book.pdf, p. 125

  • Margottini C, Molin D, Serva L (1992) Intensity versus ground motion: a new approach using Italian data. Eng Geol 33(1):45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musson, R., (2002) Intensity and Intensity Scales, IASPEI New manual of seismological observatory practice, ch. 12, pp. 653–672, ed. Bormann, P., GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Potsdam

  • Musson RMW, Grunthal G, Stucchi M (2010) The comparison of macroseismic intensity scales. J Seismol. doi:10.1007/s10950-009-9172-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Pailoplee S (2012) Relationship between modified Mercalli intensity and peak ground acceleration in Myanmar. Natural Science, Vol 4(Special Issue):624–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panza, G.F., Cazzaro, R and Vaccari, F., (1997) Correlation macroseismic intensities and seismic goround motion parameters, Annali Di Geofisica, Vol. XL, N. 5, pp. 1371–1382

  • Paolucci, R., F. Pacor, R. Puglia, G. Ameri, C. Cauzzi, and Massa M (2011) Record processing in ITACA, the new Italian strong-motion database, in Earthquake Data in Engineering Seismology—Predictive Models, Data Management and Networks,S.Akkar,P.Gülkan,andT.vanEck (Editors), Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 99–113, ISBN: 978–94007–0151-9 (printed version) 978–94–007-0152-6 (e-book version)

  • Sabegh SY, Tsang H-H, Lam NTK (2011) Conversion between peak ground motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity values. J Earthq Eng 15(7):1138–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinaiean, F. (2006) Research on strong ground movement in Iran (the catalog attenuation relations), Ph.D Thesis, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology

  • Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1975) On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion. Bull seism Soc Am 65(1):139–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Tselentis G-A, Danciu L (2008) Empirical relationships between modified Mercalli intensity and engineering ground-motion parameters in Greece. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(4):1863–1875. doi:10.1785/0120070172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H (1999a) Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity for earthquakes in California. Earthquake Spectra 15:557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H, Scrivner CW, Worden CB (1999b) TriNet ShakeMaps: rapid generation of instrumental ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in Southern California. Earthquake Spectra 15:537–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden CB, Gerstenberger MC, Rhoades DA, Wald DJ (2012) Probabilistic relationships between ground-motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102(1):204–221. doi:10.1785/0120110156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu YM, Teng T-L, Shin TC, Hsiao NC (2003) Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and intensity in Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(1):386–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare, M. (1999) Contribution a' L' Etude Des Mouvements Forts en Iran: Du Catalogue Aux Lois d' Attenuations, Ph.D. Thesis Universite' Joseph- Fourier, Grenoble, France, 237p

  • Zare M, Bard P-Y, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (1999) Site characterizations for the Iranian strong motion network. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 18(2):101–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare, M. and Memarian, H., (2003) “Macroseismic Intensity and Attenuation Laws: A Study on the Intensities of the Iranian Earthquakes of 1975–2000”, 4th International Conf. on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, IIEES, I.R. Iran

  • Zare M, Amini H, Yazdi P, Sesetyan K, Demircioglu MB, Kalafat D, Erdik M, Giardini D, Asif Khan M, Tsereteli N (2014) Recent developments of the Middle East catalog. J Seismol 18(4):749–772. doi:10.1007/s10950-014-9444-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express his very great appreciation to Road, Housing and Urban Development Research center for accessing to the waveform of 140 three-component accelerograms of ISMN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Zare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zare, M. Recent development of the earthquake strong motion-intensity catalog and intensity prediction equations for Iran. J Seismol 21, 591–613 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-016-9622-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-016-9622-4

Keywords

Navigation