Abstract
Cairo is the capital of Egypt and the largest city in the Arab world and Africa, and the sixteenth largest metropolitan area in the world. It was founded in the tenth century (969 ad) and is 1046 years old. It has long been a center of the region’s political and cultural life. Therefore, the earthquake risk assessment for Cairo has a great importance. The present work aims to analysis the earthquake hazard of Cairo as a key input’s element for the risk assessment. The regional seismotectonics setting shows that Cairo could be affected by both far- and near-field seismic sources. The seismic hazard of Cairo has been estimated using the probabilistic seismic hazard approach. The logic tree frame work was used during the calculations. Epistemic uncertainties were considered into account by using alternative seismotectonics models and alternative ground motion prediction equations. Seismic hazard values have been estimated within a grid of 0.1° × 0.1 ° spacing for all of Cairo’s districts at different spectral periods and four return periods (224, 615, 1230, and 4745 years). Moreover, the uniform hazard spectra have been calculated at the same return periods. The pattern of the contour maps show that the highest values of the peak ground acceleration is concentrated in the eastern zone’s districts (e.g., El Nozha) and the lowest values at the northern and western zone’s districts (e.g., El Sharabiya and El Khalifa).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abou Elenean KM, Hussein HM (2008) The October 11, 1999 and November 08, 2006 beni suef earthquakes, Egypt. Pure Appl Geophys 165:1391–1410
Abrahmson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectra attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68:94–127
Ambraseys NN (1995) The prediction of earthquake peak ground acceleration in Europe. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 24:467–490
Ambraseys NN, Melville CP, Adams RD (1994) The seismicity of Egypt, Arabia and Red Sea. Cambridge Univ. Press
Badawy A (1998) Earthquake hazard analysis in northern Egypt. Acta Geod Geophys Hung 33(2–4):341–357
Badawy A (1999) Historical seismicity of Egypt. Acta Geod Geophys Hung 34(1–2):119–135
Badawy A (2001) Status of the crustal stress in Egypt as inferred from earthquake focal mechanisms and borehole breakout. Tectonophysics 343(1–2):49–61
Badawy A (2005) Seismicity of Egypt. Seismol Res Lett 76(2):149–160
Bommer JJ, Abrahamson NA, Strasser FO, Pecker A, Bard P-Y H, Cotton F, Fäh D, Sabetta F, Scherbaum F, Studer J (2004) The challenge of defining upper bounds on earthquake ground motions. Seismol Res Lett 75:82–95
Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from Western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seismol Res Lett 68:128–153
Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 18:1583–1606
Deif A, Abou Elenean K, El Hadidy M, Tealeb A, Mohamed A (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard maps for Sinai Peninsula, Egypt J. Geophys Eng 6:288–297
Deif A, Hamed H, Ibrahim HA, Abou Elenean K, El-Amin E (2011) Seismic hazard assessment in Aswan Egypt. J Geoph Eng 8(2011):531–548
El Hadidy M (2008) Seismotectonics and seismic hazard studies for Sinai Peninsula, Egypt, M. Sc. Thesis. Ain Shams Univ
El-Hussain I, Deif A, Al-Jabry K, Al-Hashmi S, Al-Toubi K, Al-Shijby Y, Al-Saify M (2010) Probabilistic and deterministic seismic hazard assessment for Sultanate of Oman (Phase I) Project #22409017, submitted to Sultan Qaboos Univeristy, Oman 202 pp
El-Sayed A, Vaccari F, Panza G (2001) Deterministic seismic hazard in Egypt. Geophys J Int 144:555–567
Engdahl ER, Van Der Hilst R, Buland R (1998) Global tele-seismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:722–743
Esteva L (1970) Seismic risk and seismic design decision. In: Hansen RY (ed) Seismic design for nuclear power plants. Mass. Inst. Techn, Cambridge, pp 142–182
Frankel A (1995) Mapping seismic hazard in the central and eastern United States. Seismol Res Lett 66:8–21
Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64:1363–1367
Giardini D, Grünthal G, Shedlock KM, Zhang PZ (1999) The GSHAP global seismic hazard map. Ann Geofis 42:1225–1230
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 310
Hasegawa HS, Basham PW, Berry MJ (1981) Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Canada. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:1943–1962
Ishimoto M, Iida K (1939) Observations sur les seims euregistré par le microseisograph construite dernierment (I). Bull Earthq Res Inst, Univ Tokyo 17:443–478
Kijko A, Graham G (1999) Parametric-historic’ procedure for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis—part II: assessment of seismic hazard at specified site. Pure Appl Geophys 154:1–22
Maamoun M, Megahed A, Allam A (1984) Seismicity of Egypt. Bull Helwan Inst Astron Geophys 4:109–162
McGuire RK (1976) FORTRAN computer programs for seismic risk analysis. US Geol Survey Open-File Report No 76–67
Milne WC, Davenport AG (1969) Distribution of the earthquakes risk in Canada. Bull Seismol Soc Am 59:729–759
Mogi K (1963) The fracture of a semi-infinite body caused by a inner stress origin and its relation to the earthquake phenomena (Second Paper). Bull Earthquake Res Inst 41:595–614
Mohamed AA, El-hadidy M, Deif A, AbouElenean K (2012) Seismic hazard studies in Egypt. NRIAG J Astron Geophys 1:119–140
Ordaz M, Aguilar A, Arboleda J (2007) CRISIS 2007. Institute of Engineering, UNAM, Mexico
Reiter L (1990) Earthquake hazard analysis. Columbia University Press, Columbia, 254 p
Rydelek PA, Sacks IS (2003) Comment on ‘minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the western United States, and Japan’, by StefanWiemer and Max Wyss Bull. Seismol Soc Am 93:1862–1867
Scholz C (1968) The frequency-magnitude relation of micro-fracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:399–415
Sims D, Séjourné M (2008) The dynamics of peri-urban areas around greater Cairo: a preliminary reconnaissance. World Bank, Washington
Sobaih M (1996) Seismic design criteria for Egypt, 11th World Conference on the Earthquake Engineering. Paper No. 2158, 7pp
Wiemer S, Wyss M (2000) Minimum magnitude of complete reporting in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:859–869
Wiemer S, Wyss M (2003) Reply to ‘Comment on “minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the western United States, and Japan” by Stefan Wiemer and Max Wyss’ by Paul A Rydelek and I S Sacks. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1868–1871
Woo G (1996) Kernel estimation methods for seismic hazard area source modeling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:353–362
World Bank Development Report (2014) Risk and opportunity: managing risk for development. http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTRESEARCH/EXTWDRS/EXTNWDR2013/0,,contentMDK:23459971~pagePK:8261309~piPK:8258028~theSitePK:8258025,00.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2015
Youngs RR, Chiou SJ, Silva WJ, Humphery JR (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68:58–73
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Associate Editor, Prof. Andrzej Kijko, and the three anonymous reviewers for their critical reviews which have greatly helped to improve the paper. This work has been carried out at Earthquake Division of the National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG). The authors are also grateful to the all staff members of the ENSN. Great thanks to Prof. D. Kossy at Imperial College, London, for reviewing the revised version of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Badawy, A., Korrat, I., El-Hadidy, M. et al. Probabilistic earthquake hazard analysis for Cairo, Egypt. J Seismol 20, 449–461 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9537-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9537-5