Skip to main content
Log in

Q c and Q S wave attenuation of South African earthquakes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality factor Q, which describes the attenuation of seismic waves with distance, was determined for South Africa using data recorded by the South African National Seismograph Network. Because of an objective paucity of seismicity in South Africa and modernisation of the seismograph network only in 2007, I carried out a coda wave decay analysis on only 13 tectonic earthquakes and 7 mine-related events for the magnitude range 3.6 ≤ M L  ≤ 4.4. Up to five seismograph stations were utilised to determine Q c for frequencies at 2, 4, 8 and 16 Hz resulting in 84 individual measurements. The constants Q 0 and α were determined for the attenuation relation Q c(f) = Q 0 f α. The result was Q 0 = 396 ± 29 and α = 0.72 ± 0.04 for a lapse time of 1.9*(t s − t 0) (time from origin time t 0 to the start of coda analysis window is 1.9 times the S-travel time, t s) and a coda window length of 80 s. This lapse time and coda window length were found to fit the most individual frequencies for a signal-to-noise ratio of at least 3 and a minimum absolute correlation coefficient for the envelope of 0.5. For a positive correlation coefficient, the envelope amplitude increases with time and Q c was not calculated. The derived Q c was verified using the spectral ratio method on a smaller data set consisting of nine earthquakes and one mine-related event recorded by up to four seismograph stations. Since the spectral ratio method requires absolute amplitudes in its calculations, site response tests were performed to select four appropriate stations without soil amplification and/or signal distortion. The result obtained for Q S was Q 0 = 391 ± 130 and α = 0.60 ± 0.16, which agrees well with the coda Q c result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abercrombie RA (2000) Crustal attenuation and site effects at Parkfield, California. J Geophys Res 105:6277–6286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aki K, Chouet B (1975) Origin of coda waves: source, attenuation, and scattering effects. J Geophys Res 80:3322–3342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akinci A, Malagnini L, Herrmann RB, Pino NA, Scognamiglio L, Eyidogan H (2001) High-frequency ground motion in the Erzincan Region, Turkey: inferences from small earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91:1446–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt MBC (2014) Focal depths of South African earthquakes and mine events. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 114:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Campillo M, Plantet J, Bouchon M (1985) Frequency-dependent attenuation in the crust beneath central France from Lg waves: data analysis and numerical modelling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:1395–1411

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow RAC, Fairhead JD, Henderson NB, Marshall PD (1980) Magnitude and Q determination in southern Africa using Lg wave amplitudes. Geophys J R Astron Soc 63:735–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards B, Rietbrock A, Bommer JJ, Baptie B (2008) The acquisition of source, path, and site effects from microearthquake recordings using Q tomography: application to the United Kingdom. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:1915–1935. doi:10.1785/0120070127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez LM, Brandt MBC (2000) The reference spectral noise ratio method to evaluate the seismic response of a site. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusev AA (1995) Vertical profile of turbidity and coda Q. Geophys J Int 123:665–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberland C, Rietbrock A (2001) Attenuation tomography in the western central Andes: a detailed insight into the structure of a magmatic arc. J Geophys Res 106:11,151–11,167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havskov J, Ottemöller L (2010a) SEISAN earthquake analysis software for Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macosx. Ver. 8.3. University of Bergen, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Havskov J, Ottemöller L (2010b) Routine data processing in earthquake seismology. Springer Science+Business Media. 347 pp. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-8697-6

  • Herrmann RB, Kijko A (1980) Short-period Lg magnitudes: instrument, attenuation and source affects. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:1835–1850

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlatywayo DJ, Midzi V (1995) Determination of Lg-wave attenuation using single-station seismograms: a case study for Zimbabwe. Geophys J Int 123:291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme LB, Havskov J (1989) Q in southern Norway. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:1575–1588

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme LB, Hansen RA, Bungum H (1995) Seismic-source and wave-propagation effects of Lg waves in Scandinavia. Geophys J Int 120:525–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WS, Sato H (2006) Power-law decay characteristics of coda envelopes revealed from the analysis of regional earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett 33:L07317. doi:10.1029/2006GL025840

    Google Scholar 

  • Malagnini L, Herrmann RB, Koch K (2000) Regional ground-motion scaling in Central Europe. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:1052–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motazedian D (2006) Region-specific key seismic parameters for earthquakes in Northern Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:1383–1395. doi:10.1785/0120050162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay S, Tyagi C (2008) Variation of intrinsic and scattering attenuation with depth in NW Himalayas. Geophys J Int 172:1055–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakahara H, Carcole E (2010) Maximum-likelihood method for estimating coda Q and the Nakagami-m parameter. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:3174–3182. doi:10.1785/0120100030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Q R Railw Tech Res Inst 30(1):25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttli OW (1978) A time-domain study of the attenuation of 10-Hz waves in the New Madrid seismic zone. Bull Seismol Soc Am 68:343–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttli OW (1980) The excitation and attenuation of seismic crustal phases in Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:469–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Parvez IA, Yadav P, Nagaraj K (2012) Attenuation of P, S and coda waves in the NW-Himalayas, India. Int J Geosci 3:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson J (1993) Observation and modelling of seismic background noise. US Geological Survey Technical Report No. 93-322, 94 pp

  • Rietbrock A (2001) P wave attenuation structure in the fault area of the 1995 Kobe earthquake. J Geophys Res 106:4141–4154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders I, Brandt MBC, Steyn J, Roblin DL, Kijko A (2008) The South African National Seismograph Network. Seismol Res Lett 79:203–210. doi:10.1785/gssrl.79.2.203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein S, Wysession M (2003) Introduction to seismology, earthquakes and earth structure. Blackwell, 498 pp

  • Tankard AJ, Jackson MPA, Eriksson KA, Hobday DK, Hunter DR, Minter WEL (1982) Crustal evolution of southern Africa. Springer, New York, 480 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X-Y (2014) An inversion of Lg-wave attenuation and site response from seismic spectral ratios in the eastern China region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104:1389–1399. doi:10.1785/0120120359

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded as part of the operation and data analysis of the South African National Seismograph Network. I wish to thank the Council for Geoscience for permission to publish my results. Zahn Nel undertook the language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin B. C. Brandt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brandt, M.B.C. Q c and Q S wave attenuation of South African earthquakes. J Seismol 20, 439–447 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9536-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9536-6

Keywords

Navigation