Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Challenges to the Conceptualization and Measurement of Religiosity and Spirituality in Mental Health Research

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigating religiosity and spirituality may help to further elucidate how individuals’ worldviews influence their attitudes, behavior, and overall well-being. However, inconsistencies in how these constructs are conceptualized and measured may undercut the potential value of religiosity and spirituality research. Results from a survey of undergraduate students suggest that laypeople define spirituality as independent from social influence and that few people associate religiosity with negative terms. A content analysis of spirituality measures indicates that spirituality measures contain items that do not directly measure the strength of spirituality. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, P. E., & Dhingra, P. H. (2001). Religious involvement and volunteering: Implications for civil society. Sociology of Religion, 62, 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bregman, L. (2004). Defining spirituality: Multiple uses and murky meanings of an incredibly popular term. Journal of Pastoral Care and Counseling, 58, 349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncolology, 11, 570–579.

  • Christo, G., & Franey, C. (1995). Drug users’ spiritual beliefs, locus of control and the disease concept in relation to Narcotics Anonymous attendance and six-month outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 38, 51–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, C. (2003). The Spirituality Scale. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 23, 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group. (1999). Multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality for use in health research: A report of the Fetzer Institute/National Institute on aging working group. Kalamazoo: John E. Fetzer Institute.

  • Genia, V. (1991). The spiritual experience index: A measure of spiritual maturity. Journal of Religion and Health, 30, 337–347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, M. A., & Clark, D. A. (2013). When good people have bad thoughts: Religiosity and the emotional regulation of guilt-inducing intrusive thoughts. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 41, 24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T. W., & Edwards, K. J. (1996). The initial development and factor analysis of the Spiritual Assessment Inventory. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 24, 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, R. L., Bury, M. A., Naberhaus, D. S., & Hellmich, L. K. (1998). The Spiritual Involvement and Beliefs Scale: Development and testing of a new instrument. The Journal of Family Practice, 46, 476–486.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hays, J. C., Meador, K. G., Branch, P. S., & George, L. K. (2001). The Spiritual History Scale in four dimensions (SHS-4): Validity and reliability. The Gerontologist, 41, 239–249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, D. R. (2003). The Intrinsic Spirituality Scale: A new six-item instrument for assessing the salience of spirituality as a motivational construct. Journal of Social Service Research, 30, 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Spilka, B., Hunsberger, B., & Gorsuch, R. (2003). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Howden, J. W. (1992). Development and psychometric characteristics of the Spirituality Assessment Scale. Dissertation Services, 54, 166B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, C., & Handal, P. J. (2006). Definitions and evaluation of religion and spirituality items by religious professionals: A pilot study. Journal of Religion and Health, 45, 264–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kase, P. W., Gameroff, M. J., & Weisman, M. M. (2012). Religiosity and resilience in persons at high risk for major depression. Psychological Medicine, 42, 509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass, J. D., Friedman, R., Lesserman, J., Zuttermeister, P., & Benson, H. (1991). Health outcomes and a new index of spiritual experiences. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M., Speck, P., & Thomas, A. (2001). The royal free interview for spiritual and religious beliefs: Development and validation of a self-report version. Psychological Medicine, 31, 1015–1023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G. (2008). Concerns about measuring “spirituality” in research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196, 349–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malty, J., & Day, L. (2003). Religious orientation, religious coping and appraisals of stress: Assessing primary appraisal factors in the relationship between religiosity and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1209–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marler, P. L., & Hadaway, C. K. (2002). “Being religious” or “being spiritual” in America: A zero-sum proposition? Journal for Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marty, M. (1996). You get to teach and study religion. Academe, 82(6), 14–17.

  • Mascaro, N., Rosen, D. H., & Morey, L. C. (2004). The development, construct validity, and clinical utility of the Spiritual Meaning Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 845–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maselko, J., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2006). Gender differences in religious practices, spiritual experiences and health: Results from the US General Social Survey. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 2848–2860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I. (1989). The stress-buffering role of spiritual support: Cross-sectional and prospective investigations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 310–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattis, J. S., Fontenot, D. L., Hatcher-Kay, C. A., Grayman, N. A., & Beale, R. L. (2004). Religiosity, optimism, and pessimism among African Americans. Journal of Black Psychology, 30, 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being, and quality of life. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York: Wiley.

  • Pargament, K. I. (2009). The psychology of religion and spirituality? Yes and no. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsian, N., & Dunning, T. (2009). Developing and validating a questionnaire to measure spirituality: Psychometric process. Global Journal of Health Sciences, 1, 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. L. (2001). Spiritual transcendence and the scientific study of spirituality. Journal of Rehabilitation, 67, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K., & Fiorito, B. (2003). Means-ends spirituality questionnaire: Reliability, validity, and relationship to psychological well-being. Review of Religious Research, 45, 130–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlehofer, M. M., Omoto, A. M., & Adelman, J. R. (2008). How do religion and spirituality differ? Lay definitions among older adults. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47, 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., & Denton, M. L. (2005). Soul searching: The religious and spiritual lives of American teenagers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P., & Ubani, M. (2006). Conceptual definition and empirical validation of the Spiritual Sensitivity Scale. Journal of Empirical Theology, 19, 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, L., & Teresi, J. (2002). The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 22–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wheat, L. W. (1991). Development of a scale for the measurement of human spirituality (Measurement scale). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 3230A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinnbauer, B. J., Pargament, K. I., & Scott, A. B. (1999). The emerging meanings of religiousness and spirituality: Problems and prospects. Journal of Personality, 67, 889–919.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Caitlin Forshier for her contributions to this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Baumsteiger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baumsteiger, R., Chenneville, T. Challenges to the Conceptualization and Measurement of Religiosity and Spirituality in Mental Health Research. J Relig Health 54, 2344–2354 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0008-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0008-7

Keywords

Navigation