Skip to main content
Log in

A Closer Look at Phonology as a Predictor of Spoken Sentence Processing and Word Reading

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this study was to tease apart the roles of phonological awareness (pA) and phonological short-term memory (pSTM) in sentence comprehension, sentence production, and word reading. Children 6- to 10-years of age (N \(=\) 377) completed standardized tests of pA (‘Elision’) and pSTM (‘Nonword Repetition’) from the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Concepts and Following Directions (CFD) and Formulated Sentences (FS) were taken from the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Fourth Edition, as measures of sentence comprehension and production, respectively. Children also completed the Word Identification (Word Id) and Word Attack (Word Att) subtests of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Third Edition. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses controlling for age and nonverbal IQ revealed that Elision was the only significant predictor of CFD and FS. While Elision was the strongest predictor of Word Id and Word Att, Nonword Repetition accounted for additional variance in both reading measures. These results emphasize the usefulness of breaking down phonological processing into multiple components and they also have implications language and reading disordered populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, A. M., & Gathercole, S. E. (1996). Phonological working memory and spoken language development in young children. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49A(1), 216–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. B., Bogatz, G. A., Draper, T. W., Jungebluck, A., Sidwell, G., Ward, W. C., et al. (1974). CIRCUS: A comprehensive program of assessment services for preprimary children. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, L. M. D., Joanisse, M., & Edmunds, A. (2011). Specific language or working memory impairments: A small scale observational study. Child Language and Teaching Therapy, 27(3), 294–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory and comprehension. In D. Broadbent, J. McGaugh, M. Kosslyn, N. Mackintosh, E. Tulving, & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Working memory (pp. 75–107). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (1990). Human memory. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, D. M., Jarrold, C., Baddeley, A. D., Gunn, D. M., & Leigh, E. (2005). Mapping the developmental constraints on working memory span performance. Developmental Psychology, 41, 579–597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M. (1997). Uncommon understanding. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M., North, T., & Donlan, C. (1996). Nonword repetition as a behavioral marker for inherited language impairment: Evidence from a twin study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 391–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B. A., Tangel, D. M., Ball, E. W., Black, R., & McGraw, C. K. (1999). Developing phonological awareness and word recognition skills: A two-year intervention with low-income inner-city children. Reading and Writing, 11, 239–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, J. K. (1995). Sentence Production: From mind to mouth. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eilmas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Speech, language, and communication (Vol. 11, pp. 181–216). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read-a causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S. A., & Shankweiler, D. (1991). Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., Hogan, T. P., & Weismer, S. E. (2005). Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1378–1396.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, Z., & Tomblin, B. J. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 331–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coady, J. A., Kluender, K., & Evans, J. L. (2005). Categorical perception of speech by children with specific language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(4), 944–959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M. (1991). Working memory as a predictor of verbal fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Blennerhassett, A. (1984). How to assess the listening comprehension skills of prereaders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1372–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behaviour, 19, 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dollaghan, C., & Campbell, T. F. (1998). Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1136–1146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, V. S., & Slevc, L. R. (2007). Grammatical encoding. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 453–470). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 336–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., Briscoe, J., Thorn, A., & Tiffany, C. (2008). Deficits in verbal long-term memory and learning in children with poor phonological short-term memory skills. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 474–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C. S., Baddeley, A. D., & Hazel, E. (1994). The children’s test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2(2), 103–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, C., & Campbell, T. F. (1994). Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children: Some preliminary data. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(1), 55–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goulandris, N. K., Snowling, M. J., & Walker, I. (2000). Is dyslexia a form of specific language impairment? A comparison of dyslexia and language impaired children as adolescents. Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 103–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. R., & Kamhi, A. G. (1984). Syntactic and semantic aspects of utterances of language impaired children: The same can be less. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 30, 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamhi, A. G., & Catts, H. W. (1986). Toward an understanding of developmental language and reading disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 337–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman brief intelligence test (2nd ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konopka, A. E., & Bock, K. (2009). Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom production. Cognitive Psychology, 58(1), 68–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A. (1993). Phoneme awareness and future reading ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 259–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A., & Foy, J. G. (2007). Speech development patterns and phonological awareness in preschool children. Annals of Dyslexia, 57, 51–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A., & Liberman, I. Y. (1984). Phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(10), 592–599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. C. (1990). Neuropsychological evidence on the role of short-term memory in sentence processing. In G. Vallar & T. Shallice (Eds.), Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory (pp. 390–427). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. W. (1995). Sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment: The role of phonological working memory. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38(1), 187–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. W., & Evans, J. L. (2009). Complex sentence comprehension and working memory in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(2), 269–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. W., Magimairaj, B. M., & O’Malley, M. H. (2008). Role of working memory in typically developing children’s complex sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 331–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morais, J., Cary, L., Algeria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, L., Stackhouse, J., Goulandris, N., & Snowing, M. J. (2004). The development of early literacy skills among children with speech difficulties: A test of the ‘Critical Age Hypothesis’. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(2), 377–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nova Scotia Canada. (2013). Nova Scotia Community Counts. Retrieved from http://www.novascotia.ca/finance/communitycounts/default.asp.

  • Paul, R., & Smith, R. L. (1993). Narrative skills in 4-year-olds with normal, impaired and late-developing language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 592–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plaza, M., & Cohen, H. (2003). The interaction between phonological processing, syntactic awareness, and naming speed in the reading and spelling performance of first-grade children. Brain and Cognition, 53, 287–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. J. (1985). Sentence production and working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C. E. (1969). The bus story: A test of continuous speech. Oxford: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, E. K. (2008). The relationship between dyslexia and specific language impairment: Multiple phonological processing deficits. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 69(6-B), 3870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, E. K., & Joanisse, M. F. (2010). Spoken sentence comprehension in children with dyslexia and language impairment: The roles of syntax and working memory. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, E. K., Joanisse, M. F., Desroches, A. S., & Ng, S. (2009). Categorical speech perception deficits distinguish language and reading impairments in children. Developmental Science, 12(5), 753–767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E. M., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. (2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (CELF-4). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slevc, L. R. (2011). Saying what’s on your mind: Working memory effects on sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1503–1514.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Children’s reading and the development of phonological awareness. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cooper, J. (1999). Present and future possibilities for defining a phenotype for specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1275–1278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W. E., Herriman, M. L., & Nesdale, A. R. (1988). Metalinguistic abilities and beginning reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(2), 134–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Lely, H. K. J., & Stollwreck, L. (1997). Binding theory and grammatical specific language impairment in children. Cognition, 62, 245–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. Psychological Bulletin, 128(3), 442–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (2011). Woodcock reading mastery tests (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Cape Breton-Victoria Regional School Board, principals, teachers, children, parents, and caregivers for their participation in this research. We would also like to thank Meaghan Higgins, Kelsey Morrison, Kathleen Oliver, Kenzie Kozera, Sarah Penney, and Jennifer Gallant for their help with data collection, scoring, and entering. Funding for this research was provided by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant awarded to Erin K. Robertson.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin K. Robertson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myers, S., K. Robertson, E. A Closer Look at Phonology as a Predictor of Spoken Sentence Processing and Word Reading. J Psycholinguist Res 44, 399–415 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9292-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9292-8

Keywords

Navigation