Abstract
Object-initial clauses (OCs) are associated with more processing difficulties than subject-initial clauses (SCs) in a number of languages (e.g. English, German and Finnish), but a supportive context can reduce or neutralize the difference between SCs and OCs with respect to reading times. Still, it is unresolved how context can affect the comprehension of OCs. In the present self-paced reading study of Danish, we therefore investigated both reading times, comprehension accuracy and response times for OCs and SCs. In line with previous studies on word order processing, OCs in an unsupportive context showed longer reading times than SCs, longer response times and a comprehension accuracy as poor as chance level. A manipulation of context showed no effect of reading time, but a supportive context had a stronger facilitating effect on comprehension (response accuracy and response time) for OCs than for SCs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altmann, G., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191–238.
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1999). Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 121–143.
Bornkessel, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2006). The role of contrast in the local licensing of scrambling in German: Evidence from online comprehension. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 18, 1–43.
Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2003a). Contextual information modulates initial processes of syntactic integration: The role of inter-versus intrasentential predictions. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 29, 871–882.
Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2003b). Eliciting thematic reanalysis effects: The role of syntax-independent information during parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 269–298.
Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–56). New York: Academic Press.
Christianson, K., & Luke, S. G. (2011). Context strengthens initial misinterpretations of text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 136–166.
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Essex: Pearson Education.
Dik, S. (1997). The theory of functional grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eberhard, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Sedivy, J., & Tanenhaus, M. (1995). Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 409–436.
Erteschik-Shir, N. (2005a). On the architecture of topic and focus. In V. Molnár & S. Winkler (Eds.), On the architecture of topic and focus (pp. 33–57). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Erteschik-Shir, N. (2005b). Sound patterns of syntax: Object shift. Theoretical Linguistics, 31, 47–93.
Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203.
Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348–368.
Hannay, M. (1991). Pragmatic function assignment and word order variation in a functional grammar of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 131–155.
Harder, P., & Poulsen, S. (2001). Editing for speaking: First position, foregrounding and object fronting in Danish and English. In Ikonicitet og Struktur (pp. 1–22), Netværk for Funktionel Lingvistik, Engelsk Insititut, Københavns Universitet.
Hyönä, J., & Hujanen, H. (1997). Effect of word order and case marking on sentence processing in Finnish: An eye fixation analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 841–858.
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.
Kaiser, E., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition, 94, 113–147.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mak, W., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2008). Discourse structure and relative clause processing. Memory & Cognition, 36, 170–181.
Molnár, V. (2005). On different kinds of contrast. In V. Molnár & S. Winkler (Eds.), The architecture of focus (pp. 197–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Molnár, V., & Järventausta, M. (2003) Discourse configurationality in Finnish and Hungarian. In J. Hetland, & V. Molnár (Eds.), Structures of focus and grammatical relations Vol. 477 (pp. 231–262). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Poulsen, M. (2008). Acceptability and processing of long-distance dependencies in Danish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 31, 73–107.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide.
Slioussar, N. (2011). Processing of a free word order language: The role of syntax and context. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40, 291–306.
Team, R. D. C. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna.
Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89–134.
Vallduví, E. (1993). The informational component. PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Unpublished).
Vallduví, E., & Vilkuna, M. (1998). On rheme and kontrast. In P. W. Culicover & L. McNally (Eds.), The limits of syntax (pp. 79–108). London: Academic Press.
Vilkuna, M. (1989). Free word order in Finnish. Helsinki: Hakapaino Oy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kristensen, L.B., Engberg-Pedersen, E. & Poulsen, M. Context Improves Comprehension of Fronted Objects. J Psycholinguist Res 43, 125–140 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9241-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9241-y