Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the Predicted Structures of Loops in the ras–SOS Protein Bound to a Single ras-p21 Protein with the Crystallographically Determined Structures in SOS Bound to Two ras-p21 Proteins

  • Published:
The Protein Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have previously computed the structures of three loops, residues 591–596, 654–675 and 742–751, in the ras-p21 protein-binding domain (residues 568–1044) of the guanine nucleotide-exchange-promoting SOS protein that were crystallographically undefined when one molecule of ras-p21 (unbound to nucleotide) binds to SOS. Based on our computational results, we synthesized three peptides corresponding to sequences of each of these three loops and found that all three peptides strongly inhibit ras-p21 signaling. More recently, a new crystal structure of SOS has been determined in which this protein binds to two molecules of ras-p21, one unbound to GTP and one bound to GTP. In this structure, the 654–675 loop and residues 742–743 and 750–751 are now crystallographically defined. We have superimposed our energy-minimized structure of the ras-binding domain of SOS bound to one molecule of ras-p21 on the X-ray structure for SOS bound to two molecules of ras-p21. We find that, while the two structures are superimposable, there are large deviations of the residues 673 and 676 and 741 and 752, flanking the two loop segments. This suggests that the binding of the extra ras-p21 molecule, which is far from each of the three loops, induces conformational changes in these domains and further supports their role in signal transduction. In spite of these differences, we have superimposed our computed structures for the loop residues on those from the more recent X-ray structure. Our structure for the 654–675 segment is an anti-parallel beta-sheet with a reverse turn at residues 663–665; in the X-ray structure residues 655–662 adopt an alpha-helical conformation; on the other hand, our computed structure for residues 663–675 superimpose on the X-ray structure for these residues. We further find that our computed structures for residues 742–743 and 750–751 are superimposable on the X-ray structure for these residues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GAP:

GTPase activating protein

GTP:

guanosine triphosphate

rem:

ras-exchanger motif (second ras-p21 binding site in SOS)

rms:

root mean square

SOS:

guanine nucleotide exchange-promoting protein, also referred to as “son-of-sevenless” (SOS) in Drosophila.

References

  • C. Birchmeier D. Broek M. Wigler (1985) Cell 43 615–621 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0092-8674(85)90233-8 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL28Xms1akug%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • P. A. Boriak-Sjodin S. M. Margarit D. Bar-Sagi J. Kuriyan (1998) Nature 394 337–343

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Chen F. K. Friedman M. J. Hyde R. Monaco M. R. Pincus (1999) J. Protein Chem. 18 867–874 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjsFertbg%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • L. Chie J. M. Chen F. K. Friedman D. L. Chung S. Amar J. Michl Z. Yamiazumi M. R. Pincus (1999) J. Protein Chem. 18 875–879 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjsFertbk%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • L. Chie F. K. Friedman T. Duncan J. M. Chen D. L. Chung M. R. Pincus (2004) Protein J. 23 229–234 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjs1Kis74%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chie, L., Chung, D., and Pincus, M. R. (2005). Protein J. (in press)

  • S. Crennell E. Garman G. Laver E. Vimr G. Taylor (1994) Structure 2 535–544 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00053-8 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXlslyjsw%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • A. K. Deshpande H.-F. Kung (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7 1285–1288 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL2sXhtlajtb4%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • T. Duncan J. M. Chen F. K. Friedman M. Hyde M. R. Pincus (2004) Protein J. 23 217–228 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:JOPC.0000026417.72621.1f Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjs1Kis70%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S. M. Margarit H. Sondermann B. E. Hall B. Nagar A. Hoelz M. Pirruccello D. Bar-Sagi Kuriyan (2003) Cell 112 685–695 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00149-1 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXitFyku78%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • M. R. Pincus P. W. Brandt-Rauf J. Michl F. K. Friedman (2000) Cancer Invest. 18 39–50 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXht1ansbg%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • M. R. Pincus (2004) Front. Biosci. 9 3486–3509

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew R. Pincus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, S., Hyde, M. & Pincus, M.R. Comparison of the Predicted Structures of Loops in the ras–SOS Protein Bound to a Single ras-p21 Protein with the Crystallographically Determined Structures in SOS Bound to Two ras-p21 Proteins. Protein J 24, 391–398 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-005-7593-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-005-7593-3

Keywords

Navigation