Skip to main content
Log in

Application of ED-optimality to screening experiments for analgesic compounds in an experimental model of neuropathic pain

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spite of the evidence regarding high variability in the response to evoked pain, little attention has been paid to its impact on the screening of drugs for inflammatory and neuropathic pain. In this study, we explore the feasibility of introducing optimality concepts to experimental protocols, enabling estimation of parameter and model uncertainty. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic data from different experiments in rats were pooled and modelled using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. Pain data on gabapentin and placebo-treated animals were generated in the complete Freund’s adjuvant model of neuropathic pain. A logistic regression model was applied to optimise sampling times and dose levels to be used in an experimental protocol. Drug potency (EC50) and interindividual variability (IIV) were considered the parameters of interest. Different experimental designs were tested and validated by SSE (stochastic simulation and estimation) taking into account relevant exposure ranges. The pharmacokinetics of gabapentin was described by a two-compartment PK model with first order absorption (CL = 0.159 l h−1, V2 = 0.118 l, V3 = 0.253 l, Ka = 0.26 h−1, Q = 1.22 l h−1). Drug potency (EC50) for the anti-allodynic effects was estimated to be 1400 ng ml−1. Protocol optimisation improved bias and precision of the EC50 by 6 and 11.9. %, respectively, whilst IIV estimates showed improvement of 31.89 and 14.91 %, respectively. Our results show that variability in behavioural models of evoked pain response leads to uncertainty in drug potency estimates, with potential impact on the ranking of compounds during screening. As illustrated for gabapentin, ED-optimality concepts enable analysis of discrete data taking into account experimental constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agresti A (1999) Modelling ordered categorical data: recent advances and future challenges. Stat Med 18:2191–2207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Backonja M, Woolf CJ (2010) Future directions in neuropathic pain therapy: closing the translational loop. Oncologist 15(Suppl. 2):24–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackburn-Munro G (2004) Pain-like behaviours in animals—how human are they? Trends Pharmacol Sci 25:299–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouillon-Pichault M, Jullien V, Bazzoli C, Pons G, Tod M (2011) Pharmacokinetic design optimization in children and estimation of maturation parameters: example of cytochrome P450 3A4. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 38:25–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Danhof M, Lange EC, Ploeger BA, Voskuyl RA, Della Pasqua O (2008) Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) modeling in translational drug research. Trends Pharmacol Sci 29:186–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Argenio DZ (1981) Optimal sampling times for pharmacokinetic experiments. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 9:739–756

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dodds MG, Hooker AC, Vicini P (2005) Robust population pharmacokinetic experiment design. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 32:33–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilron I, Coderre TJ (2007) Emerging drugs in neuropathic pain. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 12:113–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hooker AC, Foracchia M, Dodds MG, Vicini P (2003) An evaluation of population D-optimal designs via pharmacokinetic simulations. Ann Biomed Eng 31:98–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huntjens DR, Danhof M, Della Pasqua O (2005) Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlations and biomarkers in the development of COX-2 inhibitors. Rheumatology 44:846–859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huntjens DR, Spalding DJ, Danhof M, Della Pasqua O (2009) Differences in the sensitivity of behavioural measures of pain to the selectivity of cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors. Eur J Pain 13:448–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Joshi SK, Honore P, Hernandez G, Schmidt R, Gomtsyan A et al (2009) Additive antinociceptive effects of the selective Nav1.8 blocker A-803467 and selective TRPV1 antagonists in rat inflammatory and neuropathic pain models. J Pain 10:306–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Le Bars D, Gozariu M, Cadden SW (2001) Animal models of nociception. Pharmacol Rev 53:597–652

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nestorov I, Graham G, Duffull S, Aarons L, Fuseau E et al (2001) Modeling and simulation for clinical trial design involving a categorical response: a phase II case study with naratriptan. Pharm Res 18:1210–1219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nyberg J, Karlsson MO, Hooker AC (2009) Simultaneous optimal experimental design on dose and sample times. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 36:125–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogungbenro K, Aarons L (2007) Design of population pharmacokinetic experiments using prior information. Xenobiotica 37:1311–1330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogungbenro K, Aarons L (2010) Optimal design of pharmacokinetic studies. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 106:250–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pang MH, Kim Y, Jung KW, Cho S, Lee DH (2012) A series of case studies: practical methodology for identifying antinociceptive multi-target drugs. Drug Discov Today 17:425–434

    Google Scholar 

  19. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, ed. R Foundation for statistical computing, R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org

  20. Sheiner LB, Beal SL (1981) Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 9:503–512

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart BH, Kugler AR, Thompson PR, Bockbrader HN (1993) A saturable transport mechanism in the intestinal absorption of gabapentin is the underlying cause of the lack of proportionality between increasing dose and drug levels in plasma. Pharm Res 10:276–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Taneja A, Di Iorio VL, Danhof M, Della Pasqua O (2012) Translation of drug effects from experimental models of neuropathic pain and analgesia to humans. Drug Discov Today 17:837–849

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tod M, Rocchisani JM (1997) Comparison of ED, EID, and API criteria for the robust optimization of sampling times in pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 25:515–537

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Walker K, Fox AJ, Urban LA (1999) Animal models for pain research. Mol Med Today 5:319–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schoemaker RC, van Gerven JM, Cohen AF (1998) Estimating potency for the Emax model without attaiing maximal effects. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 26:581–593

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Della Pasqua.

Additional information

This study was conducted on behalf of the members of the Pain Project of the TI Pharma mechanism-based PKPD modelling platform. The members are Benson N, Marshall S (Modelling & Simulation, Pfizer, Sandwich, UK); Machin I (Pain Research Unit, Sandwich, UK); DeAlwis D (Global PK/PD/TS Europe, Eli Lilly, Erl Wood, UK).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 693 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taneja, A., Nyberg, J., de Lange, E.C.M. et al. Application of ED-optimality to screening experiments for analgesic compounds in an experimental model of neuropathic pain. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 39, 673–681 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-012-9278-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-012-9278-9

Keywords

Navigation