Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of Self-Reported Work-Related Injuries and Their Association with Psychological Symptoms in General Working Population of Taiwan

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives This study investigated the prevalence of self-reported work-related injuries across occupational groups and examined their association with the risk of psychological symptoms in general working population of Taiwan. Methods Data from a national survey conducted in 2013 of a representative sample of general working people of Taiwan was analyzed, consisting of 12,528 male and 8396 female workers aged 25~65 years. Information about work-related injuries including work-related disease occurred over the previous 12 months prior to the survey was obtained by a standardized questionnaire. The presence of psychological symptoms was assessed by the Brief Symptom Rating Scale (BSRS). Also obtained were participants’ socio-demographic characteristics, working hours, job control, psychological job demands, physical job demands and job insecurity. Results Over a year, 14.91 % of male and 11.53 % of female working people had experienced work-related injuries. Workers with lower educational level, manual workers, the self-employed as well as employers of small enterprise were at higher risks for work-related injuries. Findings from multivariate logistic regression analyses with adjustment of gender, age, working hours and psychosocial work conditions showed that employees with experiences of work-related injuries over the past year were at a substantially higher risk for psychological symptoms (OR = 2.42) as compared to employees who had no experiences of work-related injuries. Conclusion A sizable proportion of workers are affected by work-related injuries and these workers are at higher risk for psychological symptoms. The psychosocial consequences of work-related injuries deserve further investigation and interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Concha-Barrientos M, Nelson D, Fingerhut M, Driscoll T, Leigh J. The global burden due to occupational injury. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48(6):470–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Takala J, Hämäläinen P, Saarela KL, Yun LY, Manickam K, Jin TW, et al. Global estimates of the burden of injury and illness at work in 2012. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(5):326–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Benavides FG, Benach J, Muntaner C, Delclos GL, Catot N, Amable M. Associations between temporary employment and occupational injury: what are the mechanisms? Occup Environ Med. 2006;63:416–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith CK, Silverstein BA, Bonauto DK, Adams D, Fan ZJ. Temporary workers in Washington State. Am J Ind Med. 2010;53(2):135–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Villanueva V, Garcia AM. Individual and occupational factors related to fatal occupational injuries: a case-control study. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43(1):123–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dembe AE, Erickson JB, Delbos RG, Banks SM. The impact of overtime and long work hours on occupational injuries and illnesses: new evidence from the United States. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62(9):588–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lowry SJ, Blecker H, Camp J, De Castro B, Hecker S, Arbabi S, et al. Possibilities and challenges in occupational injury surveillance of day laborers. Am J Ind Med. 2010;53(2):126–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Koehoorn M, Tamburic L, Xu F, Alamgir H, Demers P, McLeod C. Characteristics of work-related fatal and hospitalised injuries not captured in workers’ compensation data. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72(6):413–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin Y-H, Chen C-Y, Luo J-L. Gender and age distribution of occupational fatalities in Taiwan. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40(4):1604–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chambers L. The “toxic dose” of system problems: why some injured workers don’t return to work as expected. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):349–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirsh B, Slack T, King CA. The nature and impact of stigma towards injured workers. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(2):143–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Franche R-L, Carnide N, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, Breslin FC, Bültmann U, et al. Course, diagnosis, and treatment of depressive symptomatology in workers following a workplace injury: a prospective cohort study. Can J Psychiatry. 2009;54(8):534–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim J. Depression as a psychosocial consequence of occupational injury in the US working population: findings from the medical expenditure panel survey. BMC public health. 2013;13(1):1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Elbers NA, Hulst L, Cuijpers P, Akkermans AJ, Bruinvels DJ. Do compensation processes impair mental health? A meta-analysis. Injury. 2013;44(5):674–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuo C-Y, Liao S-C, Lin K-H, Wu C-L, Lee M-B, Guo N-W, et al. Predictors for suicidal ideation after occupational injury. Psychiatry Res. 2012;198(3):430–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin K-H, Shiao JS-C, Guo N-W, Liao S-C, Kuo C-Y, Hu P-Y, et al. Long-term psychological outcome of workers after occupational injury: prevalence and risk factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee M-B, Liao S-C, Lee Y-J, Wu C-H, Tseng M-C, Gau S-F, et al. Development and verification of validity and reliability of a short screening instrument to identify psychiatric morbidity. J Formos Med Assoc. 2003;102(10):687–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee J-I, Lee M-B, Liao S-C, Chang C-M, Sung S-C, Chiang H-C, et al. Prevalence of suicidal ideation and associated risk factors in the general population. J Formos Med Assoc. 2010;109(2):138–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lung F-W, Lee M-B. The five-item Brief-Symptom Rating Scale as a suicide ideation screening instrument for psychiatric inpatients and community residents. BMC Psychiatry. 2008;8:53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma C-C, Tai Y-M. Cut-off Values of Five-item Brief Symptom Rating Scale in Evaluating Suicidality among Military Recruits. Taiwanese J Psychiatry. 2014;28(2):109–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng Y, Luh WM, Guo YL. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Job Content Questionnaire in Taiwanese workers. Int J Behav Med. 2003;10(1):15–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grant GM, O’Donnell ML, Spittal MJ, Creamer M, Studdert DM. Relationship between stressfulness of claiming for injury compensation and long-term recovery: a prospective cohort study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(4):446–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ho S-C, Wang L-Y, Ho C-K, Yang C-Y. Fatal occupational injuries in Taiwan, 1994–2005. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(4):251–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of the Institute of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health, Ministry of Labor of Taiwan with regards to data collection and data management. This research was financially supported by a research grant of the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (102-2410-H-002-071-MY2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yawen Cheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, PH., Cheng, Y. Prevalence of Self-Reported Work-Related Injuries and Their Association with Psychological Symptoms in General Working Population of Taiwan. J Occup Rehabil 27, 195–201 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9645-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9645-2

Keywords

Navigation