Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Associations of Work-Related Factors and Work Engagement with Mental and Physical Health: A 1-Year Follow-up Study Among Older Workers

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose The goals of this study were to determine whether, among older employees, unfavourable physical and psychosocial work-related factors were associated with poorer mental and physical health and whether high work engagement buffered the associations between unfavourable work-related factors and poorer health. Methods A 1-year longitudinal study with employed persons aged 45–64 was conducted within the Study on Transitions in Employment, Ability and Motivation (n = 8,837). Using an online questionnaire, work-related factors (physical: physical load; psychosocial: psychological job demands, autonomy, and support) and work engagement were measured at baseline and health at baseline and 1-year follow-up. General linear models were used to assess associations of work-related factors and work engagement with health. Tests of interaction terms assessed whether work engagement buffered the work-related factor-health associations. Results Unfavourable psychosocial work-related factors at baseline were associated with poorer mental health at follow-up. Higher physical load, higher psychological job demands, and lower autonomy at baseline were associated with poorer physical health at follow-up. Higher work engagement at baseline was related to better physical and especially better mental health during the 1-year follow-up. Work engagement had a small effect on the associations between work-related factors and health. Conclusions Among older employees, especially the promotion of a high work engagement and, to a lesser extent, favourable work-related factors can be beneficial for mental health in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schuring M, Robroek SJ, Otten FW, Arts CH, Burdorf A. The effect of ill health and socioeconomic status on labor force exit and re-employment: a prospective study with 10 years follow-up in the Netherlands. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39:134–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schultz AB, Edington DW. Employee health and presenteeism: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:547–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van den Heuvel SG, Geuskens GA, Hooftman WE, Koppes LL, van den Bossche SN. Productivity loss at work; health-related and work-related factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:331–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Häkkänen M, Viikari-Juntura E, Martikainen R. Job experience, work load, and risk of musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58:129–35.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burdorf A, Jansen JP. Predicting the long term course of low back pain and its consequences for sickness absence and associated work disability. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63:522–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Butterworth P, Leach LS, Strazdins L, Olesen SC, Rodgers B, Broom DH. The psychosocial quality of work determines whether employment has benefits for mental health: results from a longitudinal national household panel survey. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68:806–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van den Berg TI, Alavinia SM, Bredt FJ, Lindeboom D, Elders LA, Burdorf A. The influence of psychosocial factors at work and life style on health and work ability among professional workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008;81:1029–36.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Munir F, Yarker J, Haslam C, Long H, Leka S, Griffiths A, et al. Work factors related to psychological and health-related distress among employees with chronic illnesses. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:259–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burr H, Albertsen K, Rugulies R, Hannerz H. Do dimensions from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire predict vitality and mental health over and above the job strain and effort-reward imbalance models? Scand J Public Health. 2010;38:59–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leijten FRM, van den Heuvel SG, Ybema JF, Robroek SJ, Burdorf A. Do work factors modify the association between chronic health problems and sickness absence among older employees? Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39:477–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The Job Demands-Resources model: state of the art. J Manage Psychol. 2007;22:309–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanste O. Work engagement, work commitment and their association with well-being in health care. Scand J Caring Sci. 2011;25:754–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66:701–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clausen T, Christensen KB, Borg V. Positive work-related states and long-term sickness absence: a study of register-based outcomes. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38:51–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eriksen W, Bruusgaard D, Knardahl S. Work factors as predictors of sickness absence: a 3 month prospective study nurses’ aides. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:271–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mache S, Danzer G, Klapp BF, Groneberg DA. Surgeons’ work ability and performance in surgical care: relations between organisational predictors, work engagement and work ability. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2013;389:317–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Airila A, Hakanen J, Punakallio A, Lusa S, Luukkonen R. Is work engagement related to work ability beyond working conditions and lifestyle factors? Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85:915–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J Organ Behav. 2004;25:293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Taris TW. Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work Stress. 2008;22:187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ybema JF, Geuskens GA, van den Heuvel SG, de Wind A, Leijten FRM, Joling C, et al. Study on transitions in employment, ability and motivation (STREAM): the design of a 4-year longitudinal cohort study among 15,118 persons aged 45–64 years. Br J Med Med Res. 2014;4:1383–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hildebrandt VH, Bongers PM, van Dijk FJ, Kemper HC, Dul J. Dutch Musculoskeletal Questionnaire: description and basic qualities. Ergonomics. 2001;44:1038–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Feleus A, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Knol DL, et al. Internal consistency and validity of a new physical workload questionnaire. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:980–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Koppes L, de Vroome E, Mol M, et al. The Netherlands working conditions survey 2009: methodology and overall results. Hoofddorp, The Netherlands: TNO; 2010.

  25. Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The job content questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3:322–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kristensen T, Borg V. Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire (COPSOQ). Copenhagen: National Institute of Occupational Health; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thielen K, Nygaard E, Rugulies R, Diderichsen F. Job stress and the use of antidepressant medicine: a 3.5-year follow-up study among Danish employees. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68:205–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bue BL, Taverniers J, Mylle J, Euwema M. Hardiness promotes work engagement, prevents burnout, and moderates their relationship. Mil Psychol. 2013;25:105–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith N, Young A, Lee C. Optimism, health-related hardiness and well-being among older Australian women. J Health Psychol. 2004;9:741–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Innstrand ST, Langballe EM, Falkum E. A longitudinal study of the relationship between work engagement and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Stress Health. 2012;28:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation [Point/Counterpoint]. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oude Hengel KM, Blatter BM, Joling CI, Van der Beek AJ, Bongers PM. Effectiveness of an intervention at construction worksites on work engagement, social support, physical workload, and need for recovery: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1008.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Koolhaas W, Brouwer S, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ. Enhancing a sustainable healthy working life: design of a clustered randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:461.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. van Berkel J, Boot CR, Proper KI, Bongers PM, van der Beek AJ. Effectiveness of a worksite mindfulness-related multi-component health promotion intervention on work engagement and mental health: results of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2014;9:e84118.

  35. Heerkens Y, Engels J, Kuiper C, van der Gulden J, Oostendorp R. The use of the ICF to describe work related factors influencing the health of employees. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1060–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hakanen JJ, Schaufeli WB. Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave 7-year prospective study. J Affect Disord. 2012;141:415–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. STREAM is being carried out with financial support from the Dutch Ministry for Social Affairs and Employment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Burdorf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leijten, F.R.M., van den Heuvel, S.G., van der Beek, A.J. et al. Associations of Work-Related Factors and Work Engagement with Mental and Physical Health: A 1-Year Follow-up Study Among Older Workers. J Occup Rehabil 25, 86–95 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9525-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9525-6

Keywords

Navigation