Skip to main content
Log in

A Survey of Fault Management in Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Network and Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Wireless sensor networks are resource-constrained self-organizing systems that are often deployed in inaccessible and inhospitable environments in order to collect data about some outside world phenomenon. For most sensor network applications, point-to-point reliability is not the main objective; instead, reliable event-of-interest delivery to the server needs to be guaranteed (possibly with a certain probability). The nature of communication in sensor networks is unpredictable and failure-prone, even more so than in regular wireless ad hoc networks. Therefore, it is essential to provide fault tolerant techniques for distributed sensor applications. Many recent studies in this area take drastically different approaches to addressing the fault tolerance issue in routing, transport and/or application layers. In this paper, we summarize and compare existing fault tolerant techniques to support sensor applications. We also discuss several interesting open research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Zhao and R. Govindan, Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of ACM SenSys, 2003.

  2. A. Woo, T. Tong, and D. Culler, Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of ACM SenSys, 2003.

  3. G. Zhou, T. He, S. Krishnamurthy, and J. A. Stankovic, Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiSys, pp. 125–138, 2004.

  4. A. Cerpa, J. Wong, L. Kuang, M. Potkonjak, and D. Estrin, Statistical model of lossy links in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE IPSN, April 2005.

  5. S. Tilak, N. B. Abu-Ghazaleh, and W. Heinzelman, A taxonomy of wireless micro-sensor network models. Mobile Computing and Communications Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 28–36, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. L. Dos Santos, Jr., E. P. Duarte, and G. M. Keeni, Reliable distributed network management by replication. Journal of Network System Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 191–213, June 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. X. Du, Identifying control and management plane poison message failure by k-nearest neighbor method. Journal of Network System Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 243–259, June 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. W. Hong, S. Park, Y. Kang, and J. Park, Enterprise network traffic monitoring, analysis, and reporting using web technology. Journal of Network System Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 89–111, March 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. L. Lutfiyya, M. A. Bauer, A. D. Marshall, and D. K. Stokes, Fault management in distributed systems: A policy-driven approach. Journal of Network System Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 499–525, December 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Ensel and A. Keller, An approach for managing service dependencies with xml and the resource description framework. Journal of Network System Management, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 147–170, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, An energy-efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of InfoCom, 2002.

  12. A. S. Tanenbaum and M. V. Steen, Distributed Systems: Principles and Paradigms. Prentice Hall, 2002.

  13. X. Wang, G. Xing, Y. Zhang, C. Lu, R. Pless, and C. Gill, Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration in wireless sensor networks. In Proceeding of the ACM Sensys, 2003.

  14. S. Meguerdichian, F. Koushanfar, M. Potkonjak, and M. Srivastava, Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2001.

  15. F. Xue and P. Kumar, The number of neighbors needed for connectivity of wireless networks. Wireless Networks, Vol. 10, No. 10, pp. 169–181, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V. Isler, K. Daniilidis, and S. Kannan, Sampling based sensor-network deployment. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004.

  17. Y. Zhao, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin, Residual energy scan for monitoring sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE WCNC, 2002.

  18. R. Mini, A. Loureiro, and B. Nath, The distinctive design characteristic of a wireless sensor network: the energy map. Elsevier Computer Communications, Vol. 27, No. 10, pp. 935–945, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Sankarasubramaniam, O. B. Akan, and I. F. Akyildiz, Esrt: Event-to-sink reliable transport in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc, 2003.

  20. C. Y. Wan, S. B. Eisenman, and A. T. Campbell, Coda: Congestion detection and avoidance in sensor networks. In Proceedings of SenSys, 2003.

  21. C. Jaikaeo, C. Srisathapornphat, and C. Shen. Diagnosis of sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE ICC, 2001.

  22. F. Ye, G. Zhong, S. Lu, and L. Zhang, Gradient broadcast: A robust data delivery protocol for large scale sensor networks. ACM WINET, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 285–298, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Ganesan, R. Govindan, S. Shenker, and D. Estrin, Highly-resilient, energy-efficient multipath routing in wireless sensor networks. ACM Mobile Computing and Communications Review, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 10–24, October 2002.

  24. C. Y. Wan, A. T. Campbell, and L. Krishnamurthy, Pump slowly fetch quickly(psfq): A reliable transport protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE JSAC, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 862–872, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. J. Park, R. Vedantham, R. Sivakumar, and I. F. Akyildiz, A scalable approach for reliable downstream data delivery in wireless sensor networks. In ACM MobiHoc Conference, 2004.

  26. Q. Han, I. Lazaridis, S. Mehrotra, and N. Venkatasubramanian, Sensor data collection with expected reliability guarantees. In Proceedings of IEEE PerSeNS, 2005.

  27. J. Staddon, D. Balfanz, and G. Durfee, Efficient tracing of failed nodes in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications, pp. 122–130, 2002.

  28. N. Ramanathan, K. Chang, L. Girod, R. Kapur, E. Kohler, and D. Estrin, Sympathy for the sensor network debugger. In In Proceedings of SenSys, 2005.

  29. S. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong, Tag: a tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. In USENIX OSDI, 2002.

  30. J. Considine, F. Li, G. Kollios, and J. Brers, Approximate aggregation techniques for sensor databases. In Proceedings of IEEE ICDE, 2004.

  31. V. Rajendran, K. Obraczka, Y. Yi, S. Lee, K. Tang, and M. Gerla, Combining source- and localized recovery to achieve reliable multicast in multi-hop ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the Networking, 2004.

  32. F. Koushanfar, M. Potkonjak, and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentell, Fault tolerance techniques for wireless ad hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE, Vol. 2, pp. 1491–1496, June 2002.

  33. T. Clouqueur, K. K. Saluja, and P. Ramanathan, Fault tolerance in collaborative sensor networks for target detection. IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 320–333, March 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. C. Guestrin, P. Bodik, R. Thibaux, M. Paskin, and S. Madden, Distributed regression: an efficient framework for modeling sensor network data. In Proceedings of IPSN, 2004.

  35. G. Hartl and B. Li, Loss, inference in wireless sensor networks based on data aggregation. In Proceedings of IEEE IPSN, 2004.

  36. A. Deshpande, C. Guestrin, S. Madden, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong, Model driven data acquisition in sensor networks. VLDB Conference, 2004.

  37. C.-C. Shen, C. Srisathapornphat, and C. Jaikaeo, An adaptive management architecture for ad hoc networks. IEEE Communication Magazine, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 108–115, February 2003.

  38. R. Badonnel, R. State, and O. Festor, Management of mobile ad hoc networks: information model and probe-based architecture. International Journal of Network Management, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 335–347, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. W. Chen, N. Jain, and S. Singh, Anmp: Ad hoc network management protocol. IEEE JSAC, Vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 1506–1531, August 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. Zhao, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin, Computing aggregates for monitoring wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of SNPA, 2003.

  41. N. Ramanathan, E. Kohler, and D. Estrin, Towards a debugging system for sensor networks. International Journal of Nerwork Management, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 223–234, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. D. Starobinski, Network observation system (nosy). http://nislab.bu.edu/nislab/projects/wsn_testbed/nosy.html.

  43. G. Tolle and D. Culler, Design of an application-cooperative management system for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of EWSN, 2005.

  44. J. Lim, D. Kiskis, and K. Shin, Aglet: Modular Coordination and Management Framework. EECS, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

  45. J. Lim, D. Kiskis, and K. Shin, System support for management of networked low-power sensors. In Proceedings of IEEE/IFIP NOMS, 2006.

  46. L. B. Ruiz, J. M. Nogueira, and A. A. F. Loureiro, Manna: A management architecture for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Commmunications Magazine, Vol. 41, No. 41, pp. 116–125, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. L. B. Ruiz, I. G. Siqueira, L. B. e Oliveira, H. C. Wong, J. M. S. Nogueira, and A. A. F. Loureiro, Fault management in event-driven wireless sensor networks. MSWiM ‘04: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Han.

Additional information

Lilia Paradis is currently a graduate student in the Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Colorado School of Mines. She is also part of the Toilers Ad Hoc Networking research group. She is interested in distributed communication protocols for wireless sensor networks.

Qi Han received the PhD degree in computer science from the University of California, Irvine in 2005. She is currently an assistant professor in the Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Colorado School of Mines. Her research interests include distributed systems, middleware, mobile and pervasive computing, systems support for sensor applications, and dynamic data management. She is specifically interested in developing adaptive middleware techniques for next generation distributed systems. She is a member of the IEEE and the ACM.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paradis, L., Han, Q. A Survey of Fault Management in Wireless Sensor Networks. J Netw Syst Manage 15, 171–190 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-007-9062-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-007-9062-0

KEY WORDS:

Navigation