Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Design of a Personal Health Record and Health Knowledge Sharing System Using IHE-XDS and OWL

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Personal Health Record systems (PHRs) provide opportunities for patients to access their own PHR. However, PHRs are teeming with medical terminologies, such as disease and symptom names, etc. Patients need readily understandable and useful health knowledge in addition to their records in order to enhance their self-care ability. This study describes a Personal Health Record and Health Knowledge Sharing System (PHR&HKS) whereby users not only can maintain and import their PHR, but also can collate useful health Web resources that are related to their personal diseases. Furthermore, they can share the collated Web resources with any user with the same diseases and vice versa. To fulfill these objectives, IHE Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing (XDS) architecture was adopted to share and integrate the PHR. A registry ontology, consisting of part of the XDS document metadata attributes, the ICD-9-CM code, and part of the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (DCMES), was created to enhance the health knowledge collating and sharing functions. The system was then tested and evaluated by 30 users. Among these individuals, 24 (81 %) held positive views on the ease of use and usefulness of the system while the remainder, who held either neutral (14 %) or negative (5 %) attitudes, were identified as individuals who were somewhat unwilling to maintain any PHR or share any information with others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Do, N. V., Barnhill, R., Heermann-Do, K. A., Salzman, K. L., and Gimbel, R. W., The military health system’s personal health record pilot with Microsoft HealthVault and Google Health. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 18(2):118–124, 2011. doi:10.1136/jamia.2010.004671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eysenbach, G., Medicine 2.0: Social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J. Med. Internet Res. 10(3):e22, 2008. doi:10.2196/jmir.1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adida, B., Sanyal, A., Zabak, S., Kohane, I. S., and Mandl, K. D., (3041305) Indivo x: developing a fully substitutable personally controlled health record platform. In: AMIA Annu Symp Proc. pp 6–10, 2010.

  4. Halamka, J. D., Mandl, K. D., and Tang, P. C., Early experiences with Personal Health Records. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15(1):1–7, 2008. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. United States Departments of Vertrans Affairs my healthvet. https://www.myhealth.va.gov/mhv-portal-web/. Accessed 24 August, 2011.

  6. Markle Foundation, (2003) Connecting for health: a public-private collaborative. The Personal Health Working Group: Final Report. July 1, 2003.

  7. Bodenreider, O., Biomedical ontologies in action: Role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support. Yearb. Med. Inform. 67–79, 2008.

  8. Archer, N., Fevrier-Thomas, U., Lokker, C., McKibbon, K. A., and Straus, S. E., Personal health records: A scoping review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 18(4):515–522, 2011. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang, P., Ash, J., Bates, D., Overhage, J., and Sands, D., Personal Health Records: Definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13(2):121–126, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. American Health Information Management Association, American Medical Informatics Association, The value of Personal Health Records: A joint position statement for consumers of health care. J. AHIMA 78(4):22–24, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Takeda, H., Matsumura, Y., Kuwata, S., Nakano, H., Sakamoto, N., and Yamamoto, R., Architecture for networked electronic patient record systems. Int. J. Med. Inform. 60(2):161–167, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aden, T., and Eichelberg, M., Cross-enterprise search and access to clinical information based on IHE retrieve information, 2005.

  13. Frost, J. H., and Massagli, M. P., Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: What can happen when patients have access to one another’s data. J. Med. Internet Res. 10(3):e15, 2008. doi:10.2196/jmir.1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ACC, HIMSS, RSNA, IT infrastructure technical framework integration profiles volume 2 revision 4.0. vol 2. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise, 2007.

  15. Van De Belt, T. H., Engelen, L. J., Berben, S. A., and Schoonhoven, L., Definition of health 2.0 and medicine 2.0: A systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 12(2):e18, 2010. doi:10.2196/jmir.1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giustini, D., Web 3.0 and medicine. BMJ 335(7633):1273–1274, 2007. doi:10.1136/bmj.39428.494236.BE.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. U.S. National Library of Medicine, (2012) MedlinePlus connect: technical information. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/connect/technical.html. Accessed 15 May 2012.

  18. Myers, M. F., and Gabbard, G. O., The physician as patient: a clinical handbook for mental health professionals. American Psychiatric Publishing, VA, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kamel, B., Harvey, F., Foudsari, A., Bellazzi, R., Hernando, M., Deutsch, T., Cramp, D., and Carson, E., A proposed semantic framework for diabetes education content management, customisation and delivery within the M2DM project. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 83(3):188–197, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dossia Service Corporation, (2011) Health content application. http://www.dossia.org/. Accessed 25 August 2011.

  21. Boulos, M., Roudsari, A., and Carson, E., A dynamic problem to knowledge linking semantic Web Service based on clinical codes. Med. Inf. Internet Med. 27(3):127–137, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boulos, M., A first look at HealthCyberMap medical semantic subject search engine. Technol. Health Care 12(1):33–41, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boulos, M., Roudsari, A., and Carson, E., Towards a semantic medical Web: HealthCyberMap’s tool for building an RDF metadata base of health information resources based on the Qualified Dublin Core Metadata Set. Med. Sci. Monit. 8(7):124–136, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eichelberg, M., Aden, T., Riesmeier, J., Dogac, A., and Laleci, G., Electronic health record standards—a brief overview. In: 2006.

  25. Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel, (2009) Comparison of CCR/CCD and CDA documents. http://publicaa.ansi.org/sites/apdl/hitspadmin/Matrices/HITSP_09_N_451.pdf. Accessed 24th May 2012.

  26. OASIS ebXML. http://www.ebxml.org. Accessed 22 August, 2011.

  27. Song, D., Liu, W., He, Y., and He, K., Ontology application in software component registry to achieve semantic interoperability. In: Information Technology: Coding and Computing, Washington, DC, USA, 4–6 April 2005. IEEE Computer Society, pp 181–186.

  28. Dogac, A., Laleci, G. B., Aden, T., and Eichelberg, M., Enhancing IHE XDS for federated clinical affinity domain support. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 11(2):213–221, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dogac, A., Laleci, G., Kabak, Y., Unal, S., Heard, S., Beale, T., Elkin, P., Najmi, F., Mattocks, C., and Webber, D., Exploiting ebXML registry semantic constructs for handling archetype metadata in healthcare informatics. Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies 1(1):21–36, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dogac, A., Kabak, Y., and Laleci, G., Enriching ebXML registries with OWL ontologies for efficient service discovery. In: pp 69–76, 2004.

  31. Dogac, A., Kabak, Y., Laleci, G., Mattocks, C., Najmi, F., and Pollock, J., Enhancing ebXML registries to make them OWL aware. Distrib. Parallel Dat 18(1):9–36, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Roh, Y., Kim, H., Kim, H., Kim, M., and Son, J., Semantic business registry information model. In: International Conference on Convergence Information Technology, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society, pp 2142–2145.

  33. Mattocks, C., Managing medical ontologies using OWL and an e-business registry/repository. In: XML 2004, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.

  34. Liu, W., and He, K., Design and realization of ebXML registry classification model based on ontology. In: Information Technology: Coding and Computing, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society pp 809–814.

  35. The Regenstrief Institute Inc, (2011) Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC). The Regenstrief Institute Inc. http://loinc.org. Accessed 15 October 2011.

  36. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise, IHE Patient Care Coordination (PCC) technical framework. vol 2. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise, 2011.

  37. ebXML Registry Profile for Web Ontology Language (OWL), OASIS, 2006.

  38. Frassica, J. J., Frequency of laboratory test utilization in the intensive care unit and its implications for large-scale data collection efforts. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. JAMIA 12(2):229–233, 2005. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. dom4j.org dom4j. http://www.dom4j.org/. Accessed 4th August 2011.

  40. Frassica, J. J., Frequency of laboratory test utilization in the intensive care unit and its implications for large scale data collection efforts. AMIA Annu. Symp. AMIA Symp. AMIA Symp. 844, 2003.

  41. Khan, A. N., Griffith, S. P., Moore, C., Russell, D., Rosario, A. C., Jr., and Bertolli, J., Standardizing laboratory data by mapping to LOINC. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. JAMIA 13(3):353–355, 2006. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. hk-doctor.com, Medical dictionary on-line for Chinese. http://www.hk-doctor.com/html/dict.php, 2012.

  43. Baorto, D. M., Cimino, J. J., Parvin, C. A., and Kahn, M. G., Combining laboratory data sets from multiple institutions using the logical observation identifier names and codes (LOINC). Int. J. Med. Inform. 51(1):29–37, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Olivier Bodenreider Issues in mapping LOINC laboratory tests to SNOMED CT. In: AMIA 2008 Symposium Proceedings. p 54, 2008.

  45. Christine, de la L., Michael, P. M., and Paul, W. PatientsLikeMe, a data-sharing online community: benfits for patient with Epilepsy. Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Honolulu, USA, 9–16 April, 2011.

  46. Boulos, M., Harvey, F., Roudsari, A., Bellazzi, R., Hernando, M., Deutsch, T., Cramp, D., and Carson, E., A proposed semantic framework for diabetes education content management, customisation and delivery within the M2DM project. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 83(3):188–197, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors thank the National Science Council of Taiwan for supporting this research under the grant of NSC 94-2218-E-010-005, NSC 95-2218-E-010-002 and NSC 96-2218-E-010-001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Der-Ming Liou.

Appendix

Appendix

The users’ satisfaction questionnaire for the Personal Health Record and Health Knowledge Sharing (PHR&HKS) prototype system.

(The original questionnaire was in Chinese)

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, LH., Chou, YT., Huang, EW. et al. Design of a Personal Health Record and Health Knowledge Sharing System Using IHE-XDS and OWL. J Med Syst 37, 9921 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-012-9921-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-012-9921-4

Keywords

Navigation