Abstract
This article analyzes narrative illustrations in genetic counseling textbooks as a way of understanding professional habitus--the dispositions that motivate professional behavior. In particular, this analysis shows that there are significant differences in how the textbooks' expository and narrative portions represent Down syndrome, genetic counseling practice, and patient behaviors. While the narrative portions of the text position the genetic counseling profession as working in service to the values of genetic medicine, the expository portions represent genetic counselors as neutral parties. Ultimately, this article argues that this ambiguity is harmful to the production of a professional habitus that is consistent with espoused professional values concerning respect for persons with disabilities and the promotion of psychosocial counseling.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allyse, Megan, Lauren Sayres, Taylor Goodspeede, and Mildred Cho. 2014. “Attitudes Towards Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Aneuploidy Among United States Adults of Reproductive Age.” Journal of Perinatology 34 (6): 429–434.
Berube, Michael. 1996. Life as We Know It: A Father, a Family, and an Exceptional Child. New York: Vintage Books.
Biesecker, Barbara and Kathryn Peters. 2001. “Process Studies in Genetic Counseling: Peering Into the Black Box. American Journal of Medical Genetics (Seminars in Medical Genetics) 106 (3): 191–198.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Condit, Celeste. 1999. The Meanings of the Gene: Public Debates about Human Heredity. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Djurdjinovic, Luba. 2009. “Psychosocial Counseling.” In A Guide to Genetic Counseling, 2nd ed., edited by Wendy R. Uhlmann, Jane L. Schuette, and Beverly M. Yashar, 133–175. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
Farrelly, Ellyn, Mildred Cho, Lori Erby, Debra Roter, Anabel Stenzel, and Kelly Ormond. 2012. “Genetic Counseling for Prenatal Testing: Where is the Discussion About Disability?” Journal of Genetic Counseling 21 (6): 814–821.
Goff, Briana, et al. 2013. “Receiving the Initial Down Syndrome Diagnosis: A Comparison of Prenatal and Postnatal Parent Group Experiences.” Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 51 (6): 446–457.
Hodgson, Jan and Jon Weil. 2012a. “Talking About Disability in Prenatal Genetic Counseling: A Report of Two Interactive Workshops.” Journal of Genetic Counseling 21 (1): 17–23.
-----. 2012b. “Commentary: How Individual and Profession-level Factors Influence Discussion of Disability in Prenatal Genetic Counseling.” Journal of Genetic Counseling 21 (1): 24–26.
Hurford, Emily, Anne Hawkins, Louanne Hudgins, and Joanne Taylor. 2013. “The Decision to Continue a Pregnancy Affected by Down Syndrome: Timing of Decision and Satisfaction with Receiving a Prenatal Diagnosis. Journal of Genetic Counseling 22 (5): 587–593.
LeRoy, Bonnie, Patricia McCarthy Veach, and Dianne Bartels, eds. 2010. Genetic Counseling Practice: Advanced Concepts and Skills. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lippman, Abby. 1994. “The Genetic Construction of Prenatal Testing: Choice, Consent, or Conformity for Women?” In Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology, edited by Karen Rothenberg and Elizabeth Thomson, 9–34. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
McCarthy Veach, Patricia, Bonnie LeRoy, and Dianne Bartels. 2003. Facilitating the Genetic Counseling Process: A Practice Manual. New York: Springer.
Montgomery, Kathryn. 1996. Doctors’ Stories: The Narrative Structure of Medical Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-----. 2006. How Doctors’ Think: Clinical Judgment and the Practice of Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.
National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC). 2011. “Disability Position Statement.” Last modified June 1. http://nsgc.org/p/bl/et/blogaid=23.
Patterson, Annette and Martha Satz. 2002. “Genetic Counseling and the Disabled: Feminism Examines the Stance of Those Who Stand at the Gate. Hypatia 17 (3): 118–142.
Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Translated by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Powell, Cynthia. 2000. “The Current State of Prenatal Genetic Testing in the United States.” In Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, edited by Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch, 44–53. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Press, Nancy and Carole Browner. 1993. “‘Collective Fictions’: Similarities in Reasons for Accepting Maternal Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein Screening Among Women of Diverse Ethnic and Social Class Backgrounds." Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 8:97–106.
Rapp, Rayna. 2000. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Life of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.
Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1993. The Tentative Pregnancy: How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood, 3rd ed. New York: Norton.
Scott, J. Blake. 2003. Risky Rhetoric: AIDS and the Cultural Practices of HIV Testing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Sheets, Kathryn et al. 2011. “Practice Guidelines for Communicating a Prenatal or Postnatal Diagnosis of Down Syndrome: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.” Journal of Genetic Counseling 20 (5): 432–441.
Skotko, Brian, Susan Levine, and Richard Goldstein. 2011. “Self-perceptions from People with Down Syndrome.” American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A 155 (110): 2360–2369.
Stern, Alexandra. 2012. Telling Genes: The Story of Genetic Counseling in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Thompson, John. 1991. “Editor’s Introduction.” In Language and Symbolic Power, 3rd ed,, by Pierre Bourdieu, 1–31. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Uhlmann, Wendy, Jane Schuette, and Beverly Yashar. 2009. A Guide to Genetic Counseling, 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Weil, Jon. 2000. Psychosocial Genetic Counseling. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reed, A.R. Genetic Counseling, Professional Values, and Habitus: An Analysis of Disability Narratives in Textbooks. J Med Humanit 39, 515–533 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-016-9413-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-016-9413-5