Skip to main content
Log in

Children’s Relationships and Happiness: The Role of Family, Friends and the School in Four European Countries

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to explore how contextual factors are related to children’s subjective well-being in a group of children from 9 to 12 years of age in four European countries with different welfare systems. The main aim of this study is to examine how type of family, friends, and school relationships, as well as the environment, are related to children’s subjective well-being (SWB). We use data from the International Survey of Children’s well-being for the analysis, which explores well-being through the perceptions and responses of children. We have performed bivariate analyses and applied multiple linear regression to examine the relational and contextual dimensions (family, friends, school and neighborhood) of children’s subjective well-being. We have taken the scale used by Russell as a measure of children’s subjective well-being since we consider it to be the most appropriate for comparing the satisfaction and happiness of children in different cultural contexts. The results show that gender, family structure, social relationships (family, friends and teachers) and neighborhood safety are significant correlates and predictors of SWB. The findings also show the relationship between variables such as friends, school, violence and SWB in the different countries, which could be related to the educational and welfare policies implemented by the different welfare states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. When more than two groups are compared, the researchers applied Tukey’s pairwise mean procedure to compare countries. We compared the means of three groups, A, B, and C, using this test. We implemented 3 pairwise tests, i.e., A versus B, A versus C, and B versus C.

  2. A fragile family is a type of family structure with either a single mother/father or a cohabiting mother/father (McLanahan and Sandefur 1994).

References

  • Artis, J. E. (2007). Maternal cohabitation and child well-being among Kindergarten children. Journal of Marriage and Family,69(1), 222–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badu-Nyarko, S. K. (2011). Basic research methods in social science. Accra: Black Beam Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker-Miller, J. (1986). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, L. M., & McLanahan, S. S. (2015). Income, relationship quality, and parenting: Associations with child development in two-parent families. Journal of Marriage and Family,77(4), 996–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H. (2007). On the significance of social relationships in the development of children’s earliest symbolic play: An ecological perspective. In A. Gönçü & S. Gaskins (Eds.), Play and development: Evolutionary, sociocultural, and functional perspectives (pp. 101–129). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Keung, A., Rees, G., & Goswami, H. (2011). Children’s subjective well-being: International comparative perspectives. Children and Youth Services Review,33(4), 548–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Martorano, B., Natali, L., & de Neubourg, C. (2013). Children’s subjective well-being in rich countries. Child Indicators Research,6(4), 619–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L. (2010). Marriage and child well-being: Research and policy perspectives. Journal of Marriage and Family,72(5), 1059–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., Manning, W. D., & Stykes, J. B. (2015). Family structure and child well-being: Integrating family complexity. Journal of Marriage and Family,77(1), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, N. J., Fagan, J., Wight, V., & Schadler, C. (2011). Influence of mother, father, and child risk on parenting and children’s cognitive and social behaviors. Child Development,82(6), 1985–2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. J., & Berger, L. M. (2013). What kids get from parents: Packages of parental involvement across complex family forms. Social Service Review,87(2), 213–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. J., & Magnuson, K. A. (2011). Low-income fathers’ influence on children. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,635(1), 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F. (2016). Analysing the comparability of 3 multi-item subjective well-being psychometric scales among 15 countries using samples of 10 and 12-year-olds. Child Indicators Research,10(2), 297–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F., Bello, A., González, M., & Aligué, M. (2013). Children’s subjective well-being measured using a composite index: What impacts Spanish first-year secondary education students’ subjective well-being? Child Indicators Research,6(3), 433–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F., & Rees, G. (2015). Measures of children’s subjective well-being: Analysis of the potential for cross-national comparisons. Child Indicators Research,8(1), 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulton, C. J., & Korbin, J. E. (2007). Indicators of child well-being through a neighborhood lens. Social Indicators Research,84(3), 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, P. A., Cowan, C. P., & Knox, V. (2010). Marriage and fatherhood programs. The Future of Children,20(2), 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, E. M., & Merrilees, C. E. (2014). Strengthening couple relationships for optimal child development. Identifying the dynamic processes underlying links between marital conflict and child adjustment (pp. 41–58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., & Gullone, E. (2000). Why we should not use 5-point likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement. In Proceedings, second international conference on quality of life in cities (pp. 74–93). Singapore: National University of Singapore.

  • Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. (2005). Personal wellbeing index—School children manual. Melbourne: School of Psychology, Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta, P. (1993). Standardization and decomposition of rates: A users’s manual (U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports P23-186). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Diener, E. D. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin,95(3), 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. D., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research,57(2), 119–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. D., & Oishi, S. (2005). Target article: The nonobvious social psychology of happiness. Psychological Inquiry,16(4), 162–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinisman, T., Andresen, S., Montserrat, C., Strózik, D., & Strózik, T. (2017). Family structure and family relationship from the child well-being perspective: Findings from comparative analysis. Children and Youth Services Review,80, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinisman, T., & Ben-Arieh, A. (2016). The characteristics of children’s subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research,126(2), 555–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorothy, W., Bertrand, M., & Gillian, K. (2014). Developing a country typology for analyzing quality of life in Europe. Loughlinstown: Eurofound.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., Magnuson, K., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2014). Boosting family income to promote child development. The Future of Children,24(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., Langeheine, R., & Diener, E. (2003). Comparing typological structures across cultures by multigroup latent class analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,34(2), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, A. H. (2002). Family policies in industrialized countries: Is there convergence? Population,57(3), 447–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Davis, C. M. (2008). Family structure effects on maternal and paternal parenting in low-income families. Journal of Marriage and Family,70(2), 452–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, R., & Huebner, S. (2003). A review of life satisfaction research with children and adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly,18(2), 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Härkönen, J., Bernardi, F., & Boertien, D. (2017). Family dynamics and child outcomes: An overview of research and open questions. European Journal of Population,33(2), 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences,359(1449), 1435–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L. (2006). Residential father family type and child well-being: Investment versus selection. Demography,43, 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L., & Casper, L. M. (2007). Handbook of measurement issues in family research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder, M. D., & Coleman, B. (2009). The contribution of social relationships to children’s happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies,10(3), 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the student’s life satisfaction scale. School Psychology International,12(3), 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, E. S., Seligson, J. L., Valois, R. F., & Suldo, S. M. (2006). A review of the brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Social Indicators Research,79(3), 477–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, E. S., Suldo, S. M., Smith, L. C., & McKnight, C. G. (2004). Life satisfaction in children and youth: Empirical foundations and implications for school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools,41(1), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye-Tzadok, A., Kim, S. S., & Main, G. (2017). Children’s subjective well-being in relation to gender—What can we learn from dissatisfied children? Children and Youth Services Review,80, 96–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klausli, J. F., & Owen, M. T. (2009). Stable maternal cohabitation, couple relationship quality, and characteristics of the home environment in the child’s first two years. Journal of Family Psychology,23(1), 103–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klocke, A., Clair, A., & Bradshaw, J. (2013). International variation in child subjective well-being. Child Indicators Research,7(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labato, I., & Kaup, S. (2014). The territorial dimension of poverty and social exclusion in Europe. Luxemburg: The EPSON Coordination Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. J., & Yoo, M. S. (2015). Family, school, and community correlates of children’s subjective well-being: An international comparative study. Child Indicators Research,8(1), 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. J., & Yoo, M. S. (2017). What accounts for the variations in children’s subjective well-being across nations? A decomposition method study. Children and Youth Services Review,80, 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1989). On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,20(2), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., Tkach, C., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2006). What are the differences between happiness and self-esteem. Social Indicators Research,78(3), 363–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D., & Brown, S. (2006). Children’s economic well-being in married and cohabiting parent families. Journal of Marriage and Family,68(2), 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D., & Lamb, K. A. (2003). Adolescent well-being in cohabiting, married, and single-parent families. Journal of Marriage and Family,65(4), 876–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsiglio, W. (2004). Stepdads: Stories of love, hope, and repair. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonell, J. R. (2007). Neighborhood characteristics, parenting, and children’s safety. Social Indicators Research,83(1), 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale, J. P. (2007). When infants grow up in multiperson relationship systems. Infant Mental Health Journal,28(4), 370–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale, J., Khazan, I., Erera, P., Rotman, T., DeCourcey, W., & McConnell, M. (2002). Coparenting in diverse family systems. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Being and becoming a parent (pp. 75–107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S., & Beck, A. N. (2010). Parental relationships in fragile families. The Future of Children,20(2), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montserrat, C., Dinisman, T., Bălţătescu, S., Grigoraş, B. A., & Casas, F. (2015). The effect of critical changes and gender on adolescents’ subjective well-being: Comparisons across 8 countries. Child Indicators Research,8(1), 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science,6(1), 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, A. B., & Nagle, R. J. (2004). The influence of parent and peer attachments on life satisfaction in middle childhood and early adolescence. Social Indicators Research,66(1/2), 35–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlander, E., & Stensöta, H. O. (2014). Grades—For better or worse? The interplay of school performance and subjective well-being among boys and girls. Child Indicators Research,7(4), 861–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality,67(1), 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2010). The olweus bullying prevention program: Implementation and evaluation over two decades. In S. R. Jimerson, S. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 377–401). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Huebner, E. S. (2005). A cross-cultural study of the levels and correlates of life satisfaction among adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,36(4), 444–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E. L., & Lee, P. D. (2003). Child well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research,61(1), 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, G. (2017). Family structure and children’s subjective well-being: A comparative analysis in eight European countries. Enfance,2017(1), 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, G., Andresen, S., & Bradshaw, J. (2016). Children’s views on their lives and well-being in 16 countries: A report on the children’s worlds survey of children aged eight years old, 201315. New York, UK: Children’s Worlds Project (ISCWeB).

  • Rees, G., Bradshaw, J., Goswami, H., & Keung, A. (2010). Understanding children’s wellbeing: A national survey of young people’s well-being. London, UK: The Children’s Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, G., & Main, G. (2015). Children’s views on their lives and well-being in 15 countries: A report on the children’s worlds survey, 201314. New York, UK: Children’s Worlds Project (ISCWeB).

  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39(6), 1161–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review,110(1), 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawhill, I. V. (2014). Generation unbound. Drifting into sex and parenthood without marriage. Washington, DC: Brookings Institutional Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoppe, S. J., Mangelsdorf, S. C., Brown, G. L., & Sokolowski, M. S. (2007a). Goodness-of-fit in family context: Infant temperament, marital quality, and early coparenting behavior. Infant Behavior and Development,30(1), 82–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoppe, S. J., Mangelsdorf, S. C., & Frosch, C. A. (2001). Coparenting, family process, and family structure: Implications for preschoolers’ externalizing behavior problems. Journal of Family Psychology,15(3), 526–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoppe, S. J., Schermerhorn, A. C., & Cummings, E. M. (2007b). Marital conflict and children’s adjustment: Evaluation of the parenting process model. Journal of Marriage and Family,69(5), 1118–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K. (2013). School bullying. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas,71, 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2001). We know some things: Parent-adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence,11(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Shannon, J. D., Cabrera, N. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2004). Fathers and mothers at play with their 2- and 3-year-olds: Contributions to language and cognitive development. Child Development,75(6), 1806–1820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F., & Smith, P. K. (2012). Anti-bullying strategies in schools: What is done and what works. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II,9, 154–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, E., Hanson, T. L., & McLanahan, S. S. (1994). Family structure and child well-being: Economic resources vs parental behaviors. Social Forces,73(1), 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2013). Child well-being in rich countries. Innocenti report card 11. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Center.

  • Vandewater, E. A., & Lansford, J. E. (1998). Influences of family structure and parental conflict on children’s well-being. Family Relations,47(4), 323–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel, J., Terry-Ann, C., & Jeanne, B.-G. (2010). Fragile families and child wellbeing. The Future of Children,20(2), 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, J. P., & Ahn, J. (2017). Understanding the typologies of child subjective well-being: A cross-country comparison. Children and Youth Services Review,80, 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Almudena Moreno Mínguez.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reference project: I+D+I Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades CS02015-69439-R.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mínguez, A.M. Children’s Relationships and Happiness: The Role of Family, Friends and the School in Four European Countries. J Happiness Stud 21, 1859–1878 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00160-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00160-4

Keywords

Navigation