Skip to main content
Log in

Is There a Stronger Association Between Children and Happiness Among the Religious? Religion as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Happiness and Child Number

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature on child number and happiness has progressed beyond simple associations and has begun to explore the roles of various attitudinal and environmental factors that moderate the relationship. Here the role of religiosity as a moderator in the relationship between happiness and child number is tested. This effect has not been examined before, which is surprising given the role that religion has been shown to play in child number more generally. I draw on both the psychology and demography literature to make a theoretical case that, as religiosity in the United States tends to be associated with pronatalist norms and culture, and as happiness is positively associated with fulfilling sociocultural imperatives, then, all things being equal, the more religious will have a higher happiness effect (or lower unhappiness effect) from their children than the less religious. Using General Social Survey data, my empirical analysis empirically confirmed this hypothesis, showing a positive and significant interaction term between self-identifying as very religious and child number. This interaction is partially mediated by another interaction term between higher ideal family size (measuring pronatalist tendencies) and number of children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adsera, A. (2006). Marital fertility and religion in Spain, 1985 and 1999. Population Studies, 60(2), 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J. S. (2001). Ideational influences on the transition to parenthood: Attitudes toward childbearing and competing alternatives. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(2), 101–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brace, P., Sims-Butler, K., Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2002). Public opinion in the American states: New perspectives using national survey data. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (Eds.). (2003). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Tay, L., & Myers, D. G. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1278–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djupe, P. A. (2000). Religious brand loyalty and political loyalties. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39(1), 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frejka, T., & Westoff, C. F. (2008). Religion, religiosity and fertility in the US and in Europe. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 24(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, C. (1971). Population, modernisation, and social structure. Boston, Little: Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces, 86(3), 1163–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. C., & Edwards, E. (2013). Measurement in the psychology of religiousness and spirituality: Existing measures and new frontiers. In K. I. Pargament, J. J Exline, & J. W. Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol 1): Context, theory, and research (pp. 51–77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Hout, M., Greeley, A., & Wilde, M. J. (2001). The demographic imperative in religious change in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 468–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. L., & Hunt, M. O. (2001). Race, region, and religious involvement: A comparative study of Whites and African Americans. Social Forces, 80(2), 605–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Eric. (2011). Shall the religious inherit the earth? Demography and politics in the twenty-first century. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravdal, Ø. (2013). Reflections on the search for fertility effects on happiness. No. 10/2013. Memorandum, Department of Economics, University of Oslo.

  • Margolis, R., & Myrskylä, M. (2011). A global perspective on happiness and fertility. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. V. (Ed.). (2012). Social trends in american life: Findings from the General Social Survey since 1972. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, S. (2007). Is fertility indeed related to religiosity? A note on:‘Marital fertility and religion in Spain, 1985 and 1999.’ Population Studies 60 (2), 205–221 by Adsera, A. Population Studies, 61(2), 219–224.

  • O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41(5), 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 67(1), 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipov, D., & Berghammer, C. (2007). Religion and fertility ideals, intentions and behaviour: A comparative study of European countries. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 5, 271–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(2), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skirbekk, V., Kaufmann, E., & Goujon, A. (2010). Secularism, fundamentalism, or Catholicism? The religious composition of the United States to 2043. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(2), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. W., & Sasaki, M. S. (1979). Decreasing multicollinearity: A method for models with multiplicative functions. Sociological Methods and Research, 8(1), 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W. (1990). GSS Methodological Report # 56: Timely Artifacts: A Review of Measurement Variation in the 19721989 GSS. Chicago. http://publicdata.norc.org:41000/gss/DOCUMENTS/REPORTS/Methodological_Reports/MR06.pdf.

  • Steensland, B., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, W. B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79(1), 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickler, J., & Danigelis, N. L. (2002). Changing frameworks in attitudes toward abortion. Sociological Forum, 17(2), 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trent, R. B. (1980) Evidence bearing on the construct validity of “ideal family size”. Population and Environment 3(3–4), 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanassche, S., Swicegood, G., & Matthijs, K. (2013). Marriage and children as a key to happiness? Cross-national differences in the effects of marital status and children on well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 348–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Cranney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cranney, S. Is There a Stronger Association Between Children and Happiness Among the Religious? Religion as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Happiness and Child Number. J Happiness Stud 18, 1713–1727 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9798-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9798-x

Keywords

Navigation