Abstract
The literature on child number and happiness has progressed beyond simple associations and has begun to explore the roles of various attitudinal and environmental factors that moderate the relationship. Here the role of religiosity as a moderator in the relationship between happiness and child number is tested. This effect has not been examined before, which is surprising given the role that religion has been shown to play in child number more generally. I draw on both the psychology and demography literature to make a theoretical case that, as religiosity in the United States tends to be associated with pronatalist norms and culture, and as happiness is positively associated with fulfilling sociocultural imperatives, then, all things being equal, the more religious will have a higher happiness effect (or lower unhappiness effect) from their children than the less religious. Using General Social Survey data, my empirical analysis empirically confirmed this hypothesis, showing a positive and significant interaction term between self-identifying as very religious and child number. This interaction is partially mediated by another interaction term between higher ideal family size (measuring pronatalist tendencies) and number of children.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adsera, A. (2006). Marital fertility and religion in Spain, 1985 and 1999. Population Studies, 60(2), 205–221.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Barber, J. S. (2001). Ideational influences on the transition to parenthood: Attitudes toward childbearing and competing alternatives. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(2), 101–127.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Brace, P., Sims-Butler, K., Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2002). Public opinion in the American states: New perspectives using national survey data. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 173–189.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. (Eds.). (2003). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Book.
Diener, E., Tay, L., & Myers, D. G. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1278–1290.
Djupe, P. A. (2000). Religious brand loyalty and political loyalties. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39(1), 78–89.
Frejka, T., & Westoff, C. F. (2008). Religion, religiosity and fertility in the US and in Europe. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 24(1), 5–31.
Goldscheider, C. (1971). Population, modernisation, and social structure. Boston, Little: Brown.
Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces, 86(3), 1163–1188.
Hill, P. C., & Edwards, E. (2013). Measurement in the psychology of religiousness and spirituality: Existing measures and new frontiers. In K. I. Pargament, J. J Exline, & J. W. Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol 1): Context, theory, and research (pp. 51–77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hout, M., Greeley, A., & Wilde, M. J. (2001). The demographic imperative in religious change in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 468–500.
Hunt, L. L., & Hunt, M. O. (2001). Race, region, and religious involvement: A comparative study of Whites and African Americans. Social Forces, 80(2), 605–631.
Kaufmann, Eric. (2011). Shall the religious inherit the earth? Demography and politics in the twenty-first century. London: Profile Books.
Kravdal, Ø. (2013). Reflections on the search for fertility effects on happiness. No. 10/2013. Memorandum, Department of Economics, University of Oslo.
Margolis, R., & Myrskylä, M. (2011). A global perspective on happiness and fertility. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 29–56.
Marsden, P. V. (Ed.). (2012). Social trends in american life: Findings from the General Social Survey since 1972. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Neuman, S. (2007). Is fertility indeed related to religiosity? A note on:‘Marital fertility and religion in Spain, 1985 and 1999.’ Population Studies 60 (2), 205–221 by Adsera, A. Population Studies, 61(2), 219–224.
O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41(5), 673–690.
Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 67(1), 157–184.
Philipov, D., & Berghammer, C. (2007). Religion and fertility ideals, intentions and behaviour: A comparative study of European countries. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 5, 271–305.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(2), 1–29.
Skirbekk, V., Kaufmann, E., & Goujon, A. (2010). Secularism, fundamentalism, or Catholicism? The religious composition of the United States to 2043. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(2), 293–310.
Smith, K. W., & Sasaki, M. S. (1979). Decreasing multicollinearity: A method for models with multiplicative functions. Sociological Methods and Research, 8(1), 35–56.
Smith, T. W. (1990). GSS Methodological Report # 56: Timely Artifacts: A Review of Measurement Variation in the 1972–1989 GSS. Chicago. http://publicdata.norc.org:41000/gss/DOCUMENTS/REPORTS/Methodological_Reports/MR06.pdf.
Steensland, B., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, W. B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79(1), 291–318.
Strickler, J., & Danigelis, N. L. (2002). Changing frameworks in attitudes toward abortion. Sociological Forum, 17(2), 187–201.
Trent, R. B. (1980) Evidence bearing on the construct validity of “ideal family size”. Population and Environment 3(3–4), 309–327.
Vanassche, S., Swicegood, G., & Matthijs, K. (2013). Marriage and children as a key to happiness? Cross-national differences in the effects of marital status and children on well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 501–524.
Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 348–368.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cranney, S. Is There a Stronger Association Between Children and Happiness Among the Religious? Religion as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Happiness and Child Number. J Happiness Stud 18, 1713–1727 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9798-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9798-x