Skip to main content
Log in

The Gold of One’s Ring is Not Far More Precious than the Gold of One’s Heart: Reported Life Satisfaction Among Married and Cohabitating South African Adults

Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper tests for differences in reported life satisfaction between married and cohabiting persons, i.e. the cohabitation gap, and in particular whether selection factors can explain the cohabitation gap. The paper also explores whether age at marriage and at start of cohabitation as well as the duration of relationship type matters for subjective well-being. Based on statistical and regression analysis of the 2008 National Income Dynamics Survey, married and cohabiting persons exhibit some differences in their respective determinants of life satisfaction. While the age at relationship commencement has no relationship with well-being, there is evidence to suggest that married people become more satisfied at a later stage in marriage, while cohabitants are more satisfied initially. A significant cohabitation gap exists (0.251), but after controlling for various selection factors, the cohabitation gap virtually disappears (0.042) and becomes insignificant, which suggests that marriage and cohabitation are very similar in South Africa. Relative income, absolute income, and education explain the largest part of the cohabitation gap. Against the global backdrop of an increasing trend towards cohabitation and declining marriage rates, the overall results of this paper suggest that, since a cohabitation gap no longer exists after controlling for selection factors, South Africans may as well not go the “official route” of entering into marriage, as cohabitation provides similar benefits in terms of its contribution to individual satisfaction with life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambert, A.-M. (2005). Cohabitation and marriage: How are they related? Ontario, Canada: The Vanier Institute of the Family Occasional Paper on Contemporary Family Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R. E., & Robbins, L. (1986). Marital status and life satisfaction among Black Americans. Journal of Marriage and Family, 48(2), 389–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrington, A., & Diamond, I. (2000). Marriage and cohabitation: A competing risks analysis of first-partnership formation among the 1958 birth cohort. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 163(2), 127–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhorat, H., & Naidoo, P. (2005). Household structure and income flows in South Africa: An analysis using the General Household Survey 2003. Report compiled on behalf of the United States Agency for International Development, United States Government.

  • Brereton, F., Clinch, J. P., & Ferreira, S. (2008). Employment and life satisfaction: Insights from Ireland. Economic and Social Review, 39(3), 207–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brien, M. J., Lillard, L. A., & Stern, S. (2006). Cohabitation, marriage, and divorce in a model of match equality. International Economic Review, 47(2), 451–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L. (2000). The effect of union type on psychological well-being: Depression among cohabitants versus marrieds. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 41, 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58(3), 668–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.L., Bulanda, J.R., & Lee, G.R. (2004). The significance of non-marital cohabitation: Marital status and mental health benefits among middle-aged and older adults. Bowling Green State University Working Paper, No. 2004/04.

  • Bumpass, L. L., & Sweet, J. A. (1989). National estimates of cohabitation. Demography, 24, 615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (2002). Families and domestic partnerships. South African Law Journal, 119, 634–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmann, J., & Goebel, J. (2010). Your house, your car, your education: The socioeconomic situation of the neighbourhood and its impact on life satisfaction in Germany. Social Indicators Research, 96, 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 997–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferriss, A. L. (2002). Religion and the quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(3), 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdtham, U., & Johannesson, M. (2001). The relationship between happiness, health, and socio-economic factors: Results based on Swedish microdata. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 553–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, B. (2003). Regulating domestic partnerships—A necessary step in the development of South African family law. South African Law Journal, 120(3), 610–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., & Style, C. B. (1983). Does marriage have positive effects on the psychological well-being of the individual? Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 24(2), 122–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, K. B. (2006). How do marriage market conditions affect entrance into cohabitation vs. marriage? Social Science Research, 35, 332–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamplova, D. (2002). Marriage and cohabitation: Qualitative differences in partnership arrangements. Czech Sociological Review, 38(6), 771–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinks, T., & Gruen, C. (2007). What is the structure of South African happiness equations? Evidence from quality of life surveys. Social Indicators Research, 82(2), 311–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. (2007). Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990–2000. Population Studies, 61(3), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravdal, Ø. (1999). Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation? Population Studies, 53, 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. (2003). Does quality of marital sex decline with duration? Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 32(1), 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101(6), 988–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1994). Noncooperative bargaining models of marriage. American Economic Review, 84(2), 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining analysis. International Economic Review, 21(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastekaasa, A. (1994). The subjective well-being of the previously married: The importance of unmarried cohabitation and time since widowhood or divorce. Social Forces, 73(2), 665–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mochon, D., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2008). Getting off the hedonic treadmill, one step at a time: The impact of regular religious practice and exercise on well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 632–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIDS. (2008). National income dynamics survey, wave 1. Cape Town: University of Cape Town, South African Labour and Development Research Unit.

  • Nordblom, K. (2004). Cohabitation and marriage in a risky world. Review of Economics of the Household, 2, 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. Economic Journal, 107(445), 1815–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powdthavee, N. (2003). Is the structure of happiness equations the same in poor and rich countries? The case of South Africa. Warwick Economic Research Papers No. 675.

  • Quisumbing, A. R., & Maluccio, J. A. (2003). Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 283–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, R. R., & Van den Heuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review, 16(4), 703–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robles, T. F., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2003). The physiology of marriage: Pathways to health. Physiology and Behaviour, 79, 409–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rule, S. (2006). Religiosity and quality of life in South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 81(2), 417–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B.S. (2009). The development of South African matrimonial law with specific reference to the need for and application of a domestic partnership rubric. Unpublished LLD thesis. Bloemfontein: University of the Free State, South Africa.

  • Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Porter, M. (2005). “Everything’s there except money”: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soons, J. P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1141–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. NBER Working Paper, No. 12944.

  • Thornton, A. (1988). Cohabitation and marriage in the 1980s. Demography, 25(4), 497–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Hill, D. H. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98(3), 628–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Teachman, J. D. (1995). The influence of school enrolment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 762–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M. W., & O’Grady, K. E. (2001). Effects of physical attractiveness, intelligence, age at marriage, and cohabitation on the perception of marital satisfaction. Journal of Social Psychology, 131(2), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Willigen, M., & Drentea, P. (2001). Benefits of equitable relationships: The impact of sense of fairness, household division of labour, and decision-making power on perceived social support. Sex Roles, 44(10), 571–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, A. C., & Easterlin, R. A. (2006). Happily ever after? Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and happiness in Germany. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 511–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to participants at the Biennial Conference of the Economic Society of South Africa, held in Stellenbosch from 5 to 7 September 2011, as well as to the Editor and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferdi Botha.

Additional information

The title is an adaptation from a Chinese proverb: “The gold of one’s heart is far more precious than the gold of one’s purse.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Botha, F., Booysen, F. The Gold of One’s Ring is Not Far More Precious than the Gold of One’s Heart: Reported Life Satisfaction Among Married and Cohabitating South African Adults. J Happiness Stud 14, 433–456 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9337-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9337-3

Keywords

Navigation