Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Informal settlement upgrading and safety: experiences from Cape Town, South Africa

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Informal settlement dwellers are disproportionately affected by ill health, violence and many other socio-economic challenges. These are largely connected to the unhealthy and unsafe physical conditions within which they live. Interventions in the built form through the provision of physical infrastructure have been proposed as a strategy to improve economic, social and health outcomes for informal settlement dwellers and are also suggested as tools to address violence and insecurity, which have reached unprecedented levels in many cities of the South. Whereas there is a clear case for improving the living conditions of people in slums, there is still much debate and uncertainty about what exactly constitutes upgrading, the most appropriate methods and approaches to upgrading, and what the objectives and desired outcomes of upgrading interventions ought to be. This paper tries to shed light on the complexity of upgrading interventions through a comparison of three upgrading projects, each utilising a particular method and approach, and their impact on the perception of safety of their beneficiaries. The research findings show that physical improvements and a full package of basic services are absolutely crucial to improve the living conditions, reduce vulnerabilities and improve the safety of informal settlement dwellers. But these need to be supported by social and economic programmes in order to bring about tangible improvements in people’s life circumstances. Research across the three sites, however, suggests that in a context marked by high unemployment, poor education and limited opportunities to break the cycle of poverty, the long-term impact and sustainability of upgrading interventions is limited in the absence of targeted programmes aimed at addressing the structural factors which drive and sustain high levels of violence and crime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. www.dhs.gov.za.

  2. Africa check: the housing fact sheet. https://africacheck.org/factsheets/factsheet-the-housing-situation-in-south-africa/.

  3. http://www.upgradingsupport.org/content/page/about.

  4. Informal structures made of zinc and wood.

  5. ‘Re-blocking’, or ‘Blocking-out’, is defined as the reconfiguration and repositioning of shelters in very dense informal settlements according to a spatial framework drafted by the community. The aim is to use the spaces in informal settlements better in order to create space for provision of better services by local government. Moreover, re-blocking groups households according to clusters which are identified by the community, and, subsequent to implementation, courtyards are created in order “to ensure a safer environment … via neighbourhood watches (all shacks face the courtyard) … [and] productive places (such as washing lines, food gardens) …” (SA SDI Alliance 2013, 2015; CoCT 2013).

  6. 27 March 2015 telephone conversation with a member of Sheffield Road Residents Committee, Mr Akhona Tshete.

  7. Illegal alcohol outlet.

References

  • Abbott, J. (2002a). An analysis of informal settlement upgrading and critique of existing methodological approaches. Habitat International, 26, 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, J. (2002b). A Method-based framework for informal settlement upgrading. Habitat International, 26, 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, J. (2004). Upgrading an informal settlement in Cape Town, South Africa. In K. Hansen & M. Vaa (Eds.), Reconsidering Informality: Perspectives from Urban Africa. Spain: Nordika Afrikainstitutet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. L. (2006). Integrated urban upgrading for the poor: The experiences of Ribeira Azul, Salvador, Brazil”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3861, March 2006.

  • Bauer, B. (2010). Violence prevention through urban upgrading: Experience from financial cooperation Germany. German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). Frankfurt: Government Printer.

  • CoCT. (2013). City’s plan to overhaul Cape Town’s Informal Settlements gets the go-ahead. http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/Pages/CityplantooverhaulCTinformalsettlementsahead.aspx.

  • Community Organisation Resource Centre (CORC). (2009). Sheffield Road Household Enumeration Report. Cape Town: CORC.

    Google Scholar 

  • CORC. (2011). The upgrading of Sheffield Road. http://sasdialliance.org.za/wp-content/uploads/docs/publications/The%20Upgrading%20of%20Sheffield%20Road.pdf.

  • Community Organisation Resource Centre (CORC). (2014). Background to Sheffield Road Household Enumeration Report and Objectives and meaning of the activity. Cape Town: CORC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Upgrading Finance Facility (CUFF). (2013). Masikhase Project Report, Chapter 2, Re-blocking as in-situ upgrading, 13 (30 October 2013).

  • Development Action Group. (2005). Tafelsig Report. South Africa: Development Action Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Development Action Group. (2009). A place to be free: A case study of the Freedom Park informal settlement. South Africa: Development Action Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, A. (2012). Census 2011. http://census2011.adrianfrith.com/.

  • Gie, J. (2009). Crime in Cape Town 2001–2008—A brief analysis of reported violent, property and drug-related Crime in Cape Town. Cape Town: Strategic Development Information and GIS Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, N. (2006). Informal settlement upgrading in Cape Town: challenges, constraints and contradictions within local government. In M. Huchzermeyer & A. Karam (Eds.), Informal settlements—a perpetual challenge?. Cape Town: UCT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huchzermeyer, M. (2006). The struggle for in situ upgrading of informal settlement: Case studies from Gauteng. In Paper presented at the Southern African Housing Foundation Conference and Exhibition, Cape Sun, Cape Town.

  • Jiusto, S. (2008). Envisioning endlovini: Options for redevelopment in Monwabisi Park, Cape Town, South Africa, University’s Interactive Qualifying Project. Cape Town: WPI Cape Town Project Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessides, C. (2005). The urban transition in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for economic growth and poverty reduction, Africa Region, Working Paper Series No. 97.

  • Koster, M., & Nuijten, M. (2012). From preamble to post-project frustrations: The shaping of a slum upgrading project in Recife, Brazil. Antipode, 44, 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mah, K. W., & Rivers, P. L. (2013). Negotiating difference in post-apartheid housing design. African Identities,. doi:10.1080/14725843.2013828996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, C. (2003). Supporting informal settlements. In F. Khan & P. Thring (Eds.), Housing policy and practice in post-Apartheid South Africa. Sandown: Heinemann Publishers (Pty) Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, R. (2013). Competing rationalities and informal settlement upgrading in Cape Town, South Africa—a recipe for failure. Journal for Housing and the Built Environment, 28, 605–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misselhorn, M. (2008). Position paper on informal settlement upgrading, part of a strategy for the office of the South African presidency. South Africa: Urban LandMark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muggah, R. (2012). Researching the urban dilemma: Urbanisation, poverty and violence. Canada: International Development Research Centre (IDRC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuijten, M., et al. (2012). Regimes of spatial ordering in Brazil: Neoliberalism, leftist populism and modernist aesthetics in slum upgrading in recife. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 33, 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010). Violence prevention and empowerment in the township of Khayelitsha, South Africa. Stories of empowerment, OECD better policies for better life. http://www.oecd.org/dac/povertyreduction/48869536.pdf.

  • Parnell, S., & Hart, D. (1999). Self-help Housing as a flexible instrument of state control in 20th century South Africa. Housing Studies, 14(3), 367–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poswa, N., & Rasmus, L. (2006). Migration Study in Monwabisi Park (Endlovini), Khayelitsha. Cape Town: Strategic Development Information and GIS Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • SA SDI Alliance. (2013). CUFF Project Report: Masikhase, Chapter 2. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://sasdialliance.org.za/cuff-project-report-2013/.

  • SA SDI Alliance. (2015). City of Cape Town adopts re-blocking policy, What is re-blocking all about?. Retrieved March 16, 2015, from http://sasdialliance.org.za/city-of-cape-town-adopts-reblocking-policy/.

  • Seedat, M., et al. (2009). Violence and injuries in South Africa: Prioritising an agenda for prevention. Lancet, 374, 1011–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheuya, S. A. (2008). Improving the health and lives of people living in slums. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1136, 298–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, W. (2006a). International trends and good practices in housing: Lessons for South African housing policy. Cape Town: Development Action Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, W. (2006b). Understanding the complexities of informal settlements: Insights from Cape Town. In M. Huchzermeyer & A. Karam (Eds.), Informal settlements—a perpetual challenge?. Cape Town: UCT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa. (2011). Census 2011 statistical release. South Africa: Statistics South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • SUN Development. (2009). Monwabisi Park in-situ upgrade—baseline survey, internal report. Cape Town: SUN Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Un Habitat. (2007). Reducing urban crime and violence: Policy directions—enhancing urban safety and security, Global Report on Human Settlements 2007, (Abridged Ed., Vol. 1). United Nations Human Settlements Programme. London: Earthscan.

  • VPUU. (2014). Monwabisi Park enumeration—key findings, internal report. Cape Town: VPUU.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2010). Violence in the City—Understanding and Supporting Community responses to urban violence. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • WPI. (2007). Informal settlement upgrading program, Indlovu Project Report. Worcester: Polytechnic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mercy Brown-Luthango.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown-Luthango, M., Reyes, E. & Gubevu, M. Informal settlement upgrading and safety: experiences from Cape Town, South Africa. J Hous and the Built Environ 32, 471–493 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-016-9523-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-016-9523-4

Keywords

Navigation