Abstract
Using a Danish household survey data from 2011, this paper investigates whether the choice of living in rural or urban residential environments is linked to the perceived reputation of such environments. Results from multiple ordered logit regressions show that the perceived status attached to living in different residential environments is strongly associated with current residential environment. For example, the probability of living in a large city was found to increase by 0.7 % along a 19-scale variable measuring the perceived degree of status attached to living in urban versus rural residential areas. Among other findings, the results suggest that causality mostly flows from status perceptions to residential environment choices.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Negative terminology included the four terms ‘the rotten banana’, ‘outskirt Denmark’, ‘the outskirt areas’ and ‘the peripheral areas’, whereas neutral terminology included the three terms ‘the rural areas’, ‘the rural districts’ and ‘in the countryside’. The rate of occurrence of each term was found through a electronic media data bank search, whereby including the total production of Danish national newspapers, regional newspapers, professional journals and magazines, news agencies, internet sources and other sources from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2011 (Winther and Svendsen 2012).
The professional institute acquired representative extracts from Statistics Denmark in September 2011, covering each of the four stratas separately. The entire sample is thus not representative of the entire country, but representative within stratas. Compared to the entire country, respondents from peripheral municipalities are overrepresented, and respondents from urban municipalities are underrepresented. By comparing the number of respondents in each municipality group with the total population numbers (people aged 18 and above) in the four municipality groups at the time of data extraction, the institute calculated the following weights (weights shown in brackets): peripheral municipalities (0.36), rural municipalities (1.06), intermediate municipalities (0.63) and urban municipalities (1.95).
In the weighted sample, 44 % of the respondents think that more status is attached to living in urban residential environments, 40 % think that an equal level of status is attached to living in urban and rural residential environments, and finally, 16 % think that more status is attached to living in rural residential environments.
There is undoubtedly some degree of correlation among independent variables. This could have led to multicollinearity. To check whether multicollinearity constitutes a problem, a variance inflation factor (VIF) multicollinearity test was performed using linear regression (based on the two regressions in Table 5). The VIFs for individual independent variables were found to range from 1.04 to 6.49. The common rule of thumb is that multicollinearity is present if the VIF of a single variable exceeds 10 (Gujarati, 2003, p. 362). Thus, the regression analyses do not seem to suffer from problems of multicollinearity.
In 2011, self-employed people occupied in the fields of ‘agriculture and horticulture’ made up 15.3 % of all self-employed people in Denmark, according to own calculations based on publicly available, online data delivered by Statistics Denmark (www.statistikbanken.dk).
The results also stem from the mere categorisation of the income variable. Collapsing the first two income categories, for example, changes the results considerably. Thus, using this 3-scale income variable, the middle and the upper income category get statistically insignificant coefficients when regressed on current residential environment. And when regressed on preferred residential environment, the middle category gets a statistically insignificant coefficient (coefficient = 0.154, z-value = 1.14; two-tailed p value = 0.25), and the upper income category gets a statistically significant coefficient with a positive sign (coefficient = 0.522, z-value = 3.52; two-tailed p value < 0.001). When income is entered in the regressions as a continuous variable, its coefficients are statistically insignificant in both regressions (both have two-tailed p values = 0.37). When linear and quadratic terms for income are introduced in the regressions, only one of the four coefficients is statistically significant (a negative coefficient for the linear term in the current residential environment regression, only significant at the 10 % level).
References
Andersen, H. S. (2008). Why do residents want to leave deprived neighbourhoods? The importance of residents’ subjective evaluations of their neighbourhood and its reputation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 23, 79–101.
Bjarnason, T., & Thorlindsson, T. (2006). Should I stay or should I go? Migration expectations among youth in Icelandic fishing and farming communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 290–300.
Blaauboer, M. (2011). The impact of childhood experiences and family members outside the household on residential environment choices. Urban Studies, 48(8), 1635–1650.
Bourdieu, P. (1987). Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Brown, L. A., & More, E. G. (1970). The intra-urban migration process: A perspective. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 52(1), 1–13.
Bures, R. M. (1997). Migration and the life course: Is there a retirement transition? International Journal of Population Geography, 3, 109–119.
Chen, Y., & Rosenthal, S. S. (2008). Local amenities and life-cycle migration: Do people move for jobs or fun? Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 519–537.
Clark, D. E., & Hunter, W. J. (1992). The impact of economic opportunity, amenities and fiscal factors on age-specific migration rates. Journal of Regional Science, 32(3), 349–365.
Danish Ministry of Housing, Urban and Rural Affairs. (2012a). Regional- og landdistriktspolitisk redegørelse 2012 [Political report on regions and rural districts 2012]. Copenhagen: Paper published by the Danish government.
Danish Ministry of Housing, Urban and Rural Affairs. (2012b). Medierne taler pænere om landdistrikter [The media talk nicer of rural districts]. Press release published 14 December 2012. http://mbbl.dk/nyheder/nyhed/medierne-taler-paenere-om-landdistrikter. Accessed 15 July 2013.
Danish Ministry of the Interior and Health and Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries. (2011). Landdistriktsredegørelsen 2011 [Rural District Survey 2011]. Copenhagen: Paper published by the Danish government.
Danish Ministry of Welfare and Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries. (2009). Landdistriktsredegørelsen 2009 [Rural District Survey 2009]. Copenhagen: Paper published by the Danish government.
Deller, S. C., Tsai, T.-H., Marcouiller, D. W., & English, D. B. K. (2001). The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(2), 352–365.
Détang-Dessendre, C., Goffette-Nagot, F., & Piquet, V. (2008). Life cycle and migration to urban and rural areas: Estimation of mixed logit model on French data. Journal of Regional Science, 48(4), 789–824.
Dziembowska-Kowalska, J., & Funck, R. H. (2000). Cultural activities as a location factor in European competition between regions: Concepts and some evidence. Annals of Regional Science, 34, 1–12.
Feijten, P., Hooimeijer, P., & Mulder, C. H. (2008). Residential experience and residential environment choice over the life-course. Urban Studies, 45(1), 141–162.
Findlay, A., & Rogerson, R. (1993). Migration, places and quality of life: Voting with their feet? In T. Champion (Ed.), Population matters: The local dimension (pp. 33–49). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Florida, R. (2002). The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 743–755.
Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143.
Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1946). From max weber: Essays in sociology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Glaeser, E. L., Kolko, J., & Saiz, A. (2001). Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography, 1, 27–50.
Gottlieb, P. D., & Joseph, G. (2006). College-to-work migration of technology graduates and holders of doctorates within the United States. Journal of Regional Science, 46(4), 627–659.
Gottschalk, G., Ærø, T., & Rasmussen, M. (2007). Dårlige boliger i landets yderområder—om omfanget og betydningen af boliger i særlig ringe stand [Bad dwellings in peripheral areas of the country—about the extent and the impact of dwellings in a particularly bad shape]. Copenhagen: Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University.
GRADER. (2012). Carsten Hansen vil redde Udkantsdanmark med kendiseffekten [Carsten Hansen wants to safe Outskirt Denmark with the celebrity effect]. Internet newspaper article published 29 February 2012. http://www.180grader.dk/Politik/carsten-hansen-vil-redde-udkantsdanmark-med-kendiseffekten. Accessed 15 July 2013.
Gujarati, N. G. (2003). Basic econometrics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hansen, C. (2013). Vigtigt at understøtte landdistrikterne [Important to support the rural districts]. Feature article published 2 January 2013 in the newspaper Fyns Amts Avis.
Herzog, H. W., & Schlottmann, A. M. (1986). The metro rating game: What can be learned from the recent migrants? Growth and Change, 17(1), 37–50.
Jensen, P.S. (2010). En analyse af ledighedsudviklingen i udkantskommunerne [An analysis of the unemployment development in the peripheral municipalities]. CLF Report 1/2010. Esbjerg: Centre for Rural Research, University of Southern Denmark.
Kim, T.-K., Horner, M. W., & Marans, R. W. (2005). Life cycle and environmental factors in selection residential and job locations. Housing Studies, 20(3), 457–473.
Kloep, M., Hendry, L. B., Glendinning, A., Ingebrigtsen, J.-E., & Espnes, G. A. (2003). Peripheral visions? A cross-cultural study of rural youth’s views on migration. Children’s Geographies, 1(1), 91–109.
Kristensen, I. T., Kjeldsen, C., & Dalgaard, T. (2006). Landdistriktskommuner—indikatorer for landdistrikt [Rural district municipalities—indicators for rural district]. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences: Department of Agricultural Production and Environment, University of Aarhus, Tjele.
Lall, S. V., Selod, H., & Shalizi, Z. (2006). Rural-urban migration in developing countries: A survey of theoretical predictions and empirical findings. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3915. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Niedomysl, T. (2004). Evaluating the effects of place-marketing campaigns on interregional migration in Sweden. Environment and Planning A, 36, 1991–2009.
Niedomysl, T. (2008). Residential preferences for interregional migration in Sweden: demographic, socioeconomic, and geographical determinants. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1109–1131.
Niedomysl, T., & Amcoff, J. (2011). Is there a hidden potential for rural population growth in Sweden? Rural Sociology, 76(2), 257–279.
Permentier, M., Bolt, G., & van Ham, M. (2011). Determinants of neighbourhood satisfaction and perception of neighbourhood reputation. Urban Studies, 48(5), 977–996.
Permentier, M., van Ham, M., & Bolt, B. (2009). Neighbourhood reputation and the intention to leave the neighbourhood. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2162–2180.
Rudzitis, G. (1999). Amenities increasingly draw people to the rural West. Rural Development Perspectives, 14(2), 9–13.
Rye, J. F. (2006). Heading for the cities? Gender and lifestyle patterns in rural youths’ residential preferences. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 60, 199–208.
Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 7(5), 80–93; Part 2: Investment in human beings.
Sørensen, J. F. L. (2013). Adgangen til offentlige serviceydelser på landet anno 2011: Hvor tilfredse er borgerne med den, og har den en indvirkning på boligpriserne og borgernes trivsel? [The access to public services in rural areas in 2011: How satisfied are the residents with it and does it impact on housing prices and the residents’ well-being?]. CLF Report 18/2013. Esbjerg: Centre for Rural Research, University of Southern Denmark.
Svendsen, G. L. H. (2004). Vi hilser da på hinanden—social kapital i en dansk udkantskommune [We do greet each other—social capital in a Danish peripheral municipality]. Dansk Sociologi, 15, 29–47.
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.
Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2003). On the effect of the ‘third-person effect’: Perceived influence of media coverage and residential mobility intentions. Journal of Communication, 53(4), 711–727.
UN. (2010). World Urbanization Prospects. The 2009 revision. United Nations. New York, NY: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.
UN (2006). World Urbanization Prospects. The. (2005). Revision. Population Division, New York, NY: United Nations.
Van Dam, F., Heins, S., & Elbersen, B. S. (2002). Lay discourses of the rural and stated and revealed preferences for rural living. Some evidence of the existence of a rural idyll in the Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 18, 461–476.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Whisler, R. L., Waldorf, B. S., Mulligan, G. F., & Plane, D. A. (2008). Quality of life and the migration of the college-educated: A life-course approach. Growth and Change, 39(1), 58–94.
Williams, A. S., & Jobes, P. C. (1990). Economic and quality-of-life considerations in urban-rural migration. Journal of Rural Studies, 6(2), 187–194.
Winther, B. W., & Svendsen, G. L. H. (2012). ‘The Rotten Banana’ fires back: The story of a Danish discourse on inclusive rurality in the making. Journal of Rural Studies, 28, 466–477.
Wolpert, J. (1965). Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate. Papers in Regional Science, 15, 159–169.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sørensen, J.F.L. The impact of residential environment reputation on residential environment choices. J Hous and the Built Environ 30, 403–425 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-014-9419-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-014-9419-0