Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of the differentiation in human vulnerability to earthquake hazard between rural and urban areas: case studies in 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake (2008) and 4.20 Ya’an Earthquake (2013), China

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taking the 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake and 4.20 Ya’an Earthquake as examples, the research’s main objective was to identify the human vulnerability of the rural areas in most of the developing countries, such as China, are higher than the urban areas and should be the hot spot to be researched. By assessing the human vulnerability, this paper offers a new research perspective to analyze the differentiation in human vulnerability to earthquake hazard between rural and urban areas; the result indicates the rural areas are characterized by a rather high human sensitivity and low human exposure, and the completely opposite results are in the urban areas. The rural areas, along with the high human sensitivity, make population more vulnerable to the severe impacts of earthquake hazards. Furthermore, this paper examines the relative impact of human conditions and building conditions on the human sensitivity. The result provides an interesting conclusion that the human sensitivity of the rural areas has a significant correlation with the percentage of houses collapsed, suggesting that the percentage of house collapsed is a decisive factor causing the higher human sensitivity in the rural areas. This paper is an initial effort to quantitatively analyze the differentiation in human vulnerability to earthquake hazard between rural and urban areas, which can warrant special attention by stakeholders to reconsider current earthquake management strategies, and develop adequate contingency plans for the rural areas to address and prevent the deaths caused by the earthquake hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADPC & UNDP (Asian Disaster Preparedness Center and United Nations Development Programme) (2005). Integrated flood risk management in Asia. Bangkok ADPC and UNDP.

  • Bahrainy, H. (2003). Natural disaster management in Iran during the 1990s-need for a new structure. Journal of Urban planning and Development, 129(3), 140–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balica, S., & Wright, N. G. (2010). Reducing the complexity of the flood vulnerability index. Environmental Hazards, 9(4), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barroca, B., Bernardara, P., Jean-Marie, M., & Hubert, G. (2006). Indicators for identification of urban flooding vulnerability. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 4, 553–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann, J., & Wisner, B. (2006). Measuring the un-measurable. The challenge of vulnerability. UNU-EHS, Bonn.

  • Bjarnadottir, S., Li, Y., & Stewart, M. G. (2011). Social vulnerability index for coastal communities at risk to hurricane hazard and a changing climate. Natural Hazards, 59(2), 1055–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohle, H. G., Downing, T. E., & Watts, M. J. (1994). Climate change and social vulnerability: The sociology and geography of food insecurity. Global Environmental Change, 4, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, R., & Stanford, L. (1998). The Northridge earthquake: Vulnerability and disaster. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boruff, B. J., & Cutter, S. L. (2007). The environmental vulnerability of Caribbean island nations. Geographical Review, 97(1), 932–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosher, L., Penning, R. E., & Tapsell, S. (2007). Resource accessibility and vulnerability in Andhra Pradesh: Caste and non-caste influences. Development and Change, 38(4), 515–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, F., Dolce, M., & Liberatore, D. (1982). A statistical study on damaged buildings and ensuing review of the MSK-76 scale. Proceedings of 7th European conference on earthquake engineering, Athens.

  • Burton, I., Kates, R. W., & White, G. F. (1993). The environment as hazard. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, O. D. (2005). System of Indicators for disaster risk management. Washington, D.C: Instituto de Estudios Ambientales-IDEA and Inter American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, J., Montz, B. E., & Tobin, G. A. (2005). Population evacuation: Assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Natural Hazards Review, 6(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1989). Editorial introduction: Vulnerability, coping and policy. Vulnerability: How the poor cope. IDS Bulletin, 20(2), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. E., Moser, S. C., Ratick, S. J., Dow, K., Meyer, W. B., Emani, S., et al. (1998). Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: The case of Revere, MA, USA. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 3(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, A. W., Hughes, R. E., Nash, D. F., & Spence, R. J. (1982). Damage assessment and ground motion in the Italian earthquake of 23.11.80. Proceedings of the seventh European conference on earthquake engineering, Athens. Greece, 101–108.

  • Collins, T. W., Grineski, S. E., & de Lourdes Romo Aguilar, M. (2009). Vulnerability to environmental hazards in the Ciudad Juarez (Mexico)-El Paso (USA) metropolis: A model for spatial risk assessment in transnational context. Applied Geography, 29(3), 448–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombi, M., Borzi, B., Crowley, H., Onida, M., Meroni, F., & Pinho, R. (2008). Deriving vulnerability curves using Italian earthquake damage data. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 6(3), 485–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Emrich, C. T., Mitchell, J. T., Boruff, B. J., Gall, M., Schmidtlein, M. C., et al. (2006). The long road home: Race, class, and recovery from Hurricane Katrina. Environment, 48(2), 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damian, C. (2011). Haiti earthquake: Corruption kills, not tremors. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2011/jan/12/earthquake-building-corruption.

  • Di Pasquale, G., Orsini, G., & Romeo, R. W. (2005). New developments in seismic risk assessment in Italy. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 3(1), 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolce, M., Masi, A., Marino, M., & Vona, M. (2003). Earthquake damage scenarios of Potenza town (Southern Italy) including site effects. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 1(1), 115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow, K. (1992). Exploring differences in our common future(s): The meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change. Geoforum, 23(3), 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elise, B., Isabelle, A. P., Davoine, P. A., Sonia, C., & Céline, L. (2012). Risk perception and social vulnerability to earthquakes in Grenoble (French Alps). Journal of Risk Research, 15(10), 1245–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai, A. S., Borzi, B., & Vlachos, S. (2004). Deformation-based vulnerability functions for RC bridges. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 17(2), 215–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EM-DAT (The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database) (2010). The international disaster database. Centre for Research on Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). Belgium: Catholic University of Louvain.

  • Esfandiar, Z. (2013). Constructing a social vulnerability index to earthquake hazards using a hybrid factor analysis and analytic network process (F’ANP) model. Natural Hazards, 65, 1331–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W., & Kantrowitz, E. (2002). Socioeconomic status and health: The potential role of environmental risk exposure. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 303–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks, C. D., Andrus, R. D., Camp, W. M., & Wright, W. B. (2008). Dynamic periods and building damage at Charleston, South Carolina during the 1886 earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 24(4), 867–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faye, S. K., & Antonios, P. (2011). Damage data analysis and vulnerability estimation following the August 14, 2003 Lefkada Island, Greece, Earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9, 1015–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fothergill, A., Maestas, E. G. M., & Darlington, J. D. (1999). Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature. Disasters, 23(2), 156–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujino, Y., Siringoringo, D. M., & Abe, M. (2009). The needs for advanced sensor technologies in risk assessment of civil infrastructures. Smart Structures and Systems, 5(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriela, R. N., & Lisa, G. L. (2012). Social vulnerability assessment for mitigation of local earthquake risk in Los Angeles County. Natural Hazards, 64, 1341–1355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovinazzi, S., & Lagomarsino, S. (2004). A macroseismic method for the vulberability assessment of buildings. In: Thirteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver.

  • Grünthal, G. (1998). European macroseismic scale 1998. Luxembourg: Cahier du Centre Europeén de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, K. (1997). Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters. Themes in Resource Management Series: Longman.

  • Ibidun, O. A. (2010). Vulnerability of poor urban coastal communities to flooding in Lagos, Nigeria. Environment and Urbanization, 22(2), 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISDR (International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) (2002). Living with Risk. A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives, Geneva.

  • Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). (2000). The study on seismic micro-zoning of the greater Tehran area in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tokyo: Main Rep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappos, A. J., Stylianidis, K. C., Michailidis, C. N., & Athanassiadou, C. J. (1992). Development of earthquake damage scenarios using a comprehensive analytical method. Proceedings of the tenth world conference on earthquake engineering. Madrid, 6013–6018.

  • Kaźmierczak, A., & Gina, C. (2011). Surface water flooding risk to urban communities: Analysis of vulnerability, hazard and exposure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 103, 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, O. P., Westgate, K., & Wisner, B. (1976). Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature, 260, 566–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. J., Chou, T. Y., Hsiao, C. P., Chung, L. K., Huang, P. H., & Wu, Y. B. (2002). The statistics and analysis of building damage on Chi–Chi earthquake. In: International training programs for seismic design of building structures, Taipei, Taiwan. National Centre for Research on Earthquake Engineering.

  • Lin, J. W. (2012). Fuzzy regression decision systems for assessment of the potential vulnerability of bridge to earthquakes. Natural Hazards, 64, 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z. (2009). Reconnaissance and preliminary observations of bridge damage in the great Wenchuan Earthquake, China. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, 19(3), 277–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, C., & Rad, F. N. (1997). An earthquake loss estimation methodology for buildings based on ATC-13 and ATC-21. Earthquake Spectra, 13, 605–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, V., Scheuer, S., & Haase, D. (2009). A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde river, Germany. Natural Hazards, 48, 17–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, R., Sotgiu, I., & Settanni, M. (2008). Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: A study in an Alpine valley in Italy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. K., Devine, N., & Jagger, K. (1989). A contextual model of natural hazard. Geographical Review, 79(4), 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neeraj, P., Federica, R., Fatima, S., Zoe, T., Earl, K., & Ravi, S. (2009). Climate resilient cities: A primer on reducing vulnerabilities to disasters. World Bank Training Series.

  • Peek-Asa, C., Ramirez, M. R., Seligson, H. A., & Shoaf, K. I. (2003). Seismic, structural, and individual factors associated with earthquake related injury. Journal of Injury Prevention, 9, 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peek-Asa, C., Ramirez, M. R., Shoaf, K. I., Seligson, H. A., & Kraus, J. F. (2000). GIS mapping of earthquake-related deaths and hospital admissions from the 1994 Northridge, California earthquake. Annals of Epidemiology, 10, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling, M. (2003). The vulnerability of cities. Natural disasters and social resilience. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranf, R. T., Eberhard, M. O., & Malone, S. (2007). Post earthquake prioritization of bridge inspections. Earthquake Spectra, 23(1), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., & Talwani, P. (1983). Building damage at Charleston, South Carolina, associated with the 1886 earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 73(2), 633–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rygel, L., O’Sullivan, D., & Yarnal, B. (2006). A method for constructing a social vulnerability index: An application to hurricane storm surge in a developed country. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Chang, 11, 741–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Petley, D. N. (2009). Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, F. O., Bommer, J. J., Sesetyan, K., Erdik, M. C., Çağnan, Z., Irizary, J., et al. (2008). A comparative study of European earthquake loss estimation tools for scenario in Istanbul. Journal of Earthquake, 12(S2), 246–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapsell, S., McCarthy, S., Faulkner, H., & Alexander, M. (2011). Social vulnerability to natural hazards. CapHazNet Project.

  • Thywissen, K. (2006). Components of risk: A comparative glossary. SOURCE No. 2, UNU-EHS, Bonn, Germany.

  • Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matsone, P. A., James, J. M., Robert, W. C., Lindsey, C., et al. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. National Academy of Sciences, 100, 8074–8079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDHA. (1992). Internationally agreed glossary of basic terms related to disaster management. Geneva: United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN/ISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). (2004). Living with risk. United Nations: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weichselgartner, J. (2001). Natural disaster research: The concept of vulnerability. Landscape Ecological Papers, 16, 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, S. D., & Taylor, C. E. (2002). Component vulnerability modeling issues for analysis of seismic risks to transportation lifeline systems. Acceptable risk processes: Lifelines and natural hazards, 21, 78–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, R.V., Reed, J.W., & Hong, S.T. (1973). Earthquake damage probability matrices. In: Proceedings of the fifth world conference on earthquake engineering, Rome, 1067–1084.

  • Whitney, D. J., Lindell, M. K., & Nguyen, H. H. D. (2004). Earthquake beliefs and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. Risk Analysis, 24(1), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B. (2002). Who? What? Where? When? in an Emergency: Notes on Possible Indicators of Vulnerability and Resilience: By Phase of the Disaster Management Cycle and Social Actor. Plate, E. (Ed.), Environment and Human Security: Contributions to a workshop in Bonn, 23–25.

  • Wisner, B. (2003). Turning Knowledge into timely and Appropriate Action: Reflections on IADB/IDEA Program of Disaster Risk Indicators. IDB/IDEA Program of Indicators for Risk Management, Manizales: National University of Colombia.

  • Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B., & Uitto, J. (2009). Life on the edge: Urban social vulnerability and decentralized, citizen-based disaster risk reduction in four large cities of the Pacific Rim. In H. G. Brauch, et al. (Eds.), Facing global environmental change (pp. 215–231). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • WMO (World Meteorological Organization) (2008). Urban flood risk management: A tool for integrated flood management. WMO/GWP Associated Programme on Flood Management.

  • Wood, N. J., Burton, C. G., & Cutter, S. L. (2010). Community variations in social vulnerability to Cascadia-related tsunamis in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Natural Hazards, 52, 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X., Lee, G. C., Lichu, F., & Shide, H. (2006). A comparative study between China and U.S. on seismic design philosophy and practice of a long span arch bridge. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 5(1), 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiing-Jenq, C., Nicole, H., Cheng-Hua, L., Shu-Ling, T., Long-Shen, C., & Hong-Jen, C. (2004). Who is at risk of death in an earthquake? American Journal of Epidemiology, 160(7), 688–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, D. K. (2012). Assessment of social vulnerability to natural disasters: A comparative study. Natural Hazards, 63, 823–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Peacock, W. G., Vedlitz, A., & Grover, H. (2008). Social vulnerability and the natural and built environment: A model of flood casualties in Texas. Disasters, 32, 537–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91372091). We are thankful to editorial support (Joris Hoekstra and Divyalochany Thangavel) and the anonymous reviewer for the improvement of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, No. 92 Xidazhi Street, Harbin, Heilongjiang, People’s Republic of China

    Jie Liu & Shaoyu Wang

Authors
  1. Jie Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shaoyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, J., Wang, S. Analysis of the differentiation in human vulnerability to earthquake hazard between rural and urban areas: case studies in 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake (2008) and 4.20 Ya’an Earthquake (2013), China. J Hous and the Built Environ 30, 87–107 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-014-9397-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-014-9397-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation