Journal of Community Health

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 239–247

Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Overdue Population: Participation and Cost Impacts of Adding Telephone Calls to a FIT Mailing Program

Authors

  • Jennifer A. Schlichting
    • VA Office of Rural Health, Rural Health Resource Center – Central RegionIowa City VA Healthcare System
    • Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) CenterIowa City VA Healthcare System
  • Michelle A. Mengeling
    • VA Office of Rural Health, Rural Health Resource Center – Central RegionIowa City VA Healthcare System
    • Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) CenterIowa City VA Healthcare System
    • Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
  • Nader M. Makki
    • Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
  • Ashish Malhotra
    • VA Office of Rural Health, Rural Health Resource Center – Central RegionIowa City VA Healthcare System
    • Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) CenterIowa City VA Healthcare System
  • Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson
    • Division of Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineMayo Clinic
  • J. Stacey Klutts
    • Department of PathologyUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
    • Pathology and Laboratory MedicineIowa City VA Healthcare System
  • Barcey T. Levy
    • Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Iowa College of Public Health
    • Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
  • Peter J. Kaboli
    • VA Office of Rural Health, Rural Health Resource Center – Central RegionIowa City VA Healthcare System
    • Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) CenterIowa City VA Healthcare System
    • Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
    • VA Office of Rural Health, Rural Health Resource Center – Central RegionIowa City VA Healthcare System
    • Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) CenterIowa City VA Healthcare System
    • Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Iowa College of Public Health
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1

Cite this article as:
Schlichting, J.A., Mengeling, M.A., Makki, N.M. et al. J Community Health (2014) 39: 239. doi:10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1

Abstract

Many people who live in rural areas face distance barriers to colonoscopy. Our previous study demonstrated the utility of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to average risk patients overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC screening). The aims of this study were to determine if introductory and reminder telephone calls would increase the proportion of returned FITs as well as to compare costs. Average risk patients overdue for CRC screening received a high intensity intervention (HII), which included an introductory telephone call to see if they were interested in taking a FIT prior to mailing the test out and reminder phone calls if the FIT was not returned. This HII group was compared to our previous low intensity intervention (LII) where a FIT was mailed to a similar group of veterans with no telephone contact. While a higher proportion of eligible respondents returned FITs in the LII (92 vs. 45 %), there was a much higher proportion of FITs returned out of those mailed in the HII (85 vs. 14 %). The fewer wasted FITs in the HII led to it having lower cost per FIT returned ($27.43 vs. $44.86). Given that either intervention is a feasible approach for patients overdue for CRC screening, health care providers should consider offering FITs using a home-based mailing program along with other evidence-based CRC screening options to average risk patients. Factors such as location, patient population, FIT cost and reimbursement, and personnel costs need to be considered when deciding the most effective way to implement FIT screening.

Keywords

Colorectal cancer screening Fecal immunochemical test Intervention Cost comparison

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2014