Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Analysis of Mercury Exposures Among the Adult Population in New York State

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extent of methylmercury exposures among adults in New York State (NYS) has not been well characterized. Over the past few years, the NYS Heavy Metals Registry (HMR) has seen an increase in both blood mercury tests being reported, and nonoccupational exposures to mercury, which appear primarily due to fish consumption. This study will, (1) Characterize the adults who are tested for blood mercury in NYS; (2) Examine the circumstances for blood mercury testing; and (3) Characterize this population in terms of exposure history, specifically those individuals who are non-occupationally exposed through a diet of seafood consumption in reference to blood mercury levels. Data available from HMR laboratory results, including basic demographics and test results, were combined with data from telephone interviews. The interview contains information on the reasons for testing, possible sources of exposure, and the individual’s work and home environment. Approximately 99 % of adults reported to the HMR, with identifiable exposures to mercury, had non-occupational exposures resulting from seafood consumption. Common types of fish consumed include salmon, tuna, and swordfish, with 90 % of adults eating seafood a few times or more per week. Information will be provided on the reasons for being tested and the range of blood mercury levels in relation to their seafood consumption. NYS residents who frequently eat fish should be aware of what types of fish contain mercury and avoid or reduce consumption of fish with high mercury levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (1999). Toxicological profile for mercury. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Dental Association (ADA). (2009). ADA Council of scientific affairs. Statement on dental amalgam. [revised August 2009; accessed October 2012]. Available: http://www.ada.org/1741.aspx.

  3. American Heart Association (AHA). (2012). Fish 101. [revised January 2012; cited October 2012]. Available: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/GettingHealthy/NutritionCenter/Fish-101_UCM_305986_Article.jsp.

  4. Armstrong, A. M., MacDonald, A., Booth, I. W., et al. (2000). Errors in memory for dietary intake and their reduction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carrier, G., Bouchard, M., Brunet, R. C., et al. (2001). A toxicokinetic model for predicting the tissue distribution and elimination of organic and inorganic mercury following exposure to methyl mercury in animals and humans. II. Application and validation of the model in humans. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 171(1), 50–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005). Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. Atlanta, GA.

  7. Engstrom, K. S., Stromberg, U., Lundh, T., et al. (2008). Genetic variation in glutathione-related genes and body burden of methylmercury. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116, 734–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geer, L. A., Persad, M. D., Palmer, C. D., Steuerwald, A. J., et al. (2012). Assessment of prenatal mercury exposure in a predominantly Caribbean immigrant community in Brooklyn, NY. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 14(3), 1035–1043.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hightower, J. M., & Moore, D. (2003). Mercury levels in high-end consumers of fish. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111, 604–608.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hightower, J. M., O’Hare, A., & Hernandez, G. T. (2007). Blood mercury reporting in NHANES: Identifying Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, and Multiracial Groups. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 173–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kershaw, T. G., Dhahir, P. H., & Clarkson, T. W. (1980). The relationship between blood levels and dose of methylmercury in man. Archives of Environmental Health, 35(1), 28–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kris-Etherton, P. M., Harris, W. S., & Appel, L. J. (2002). Fish consumption, fish oil, omega-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease. Circulation, 106, 2747–2757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahaffey, K. R., Clickner, R. P., Jeffries, R. A. (2008). Adult Women’s Blood Mercury Concentrations Vary Regionally in USA: Association with Patterns of Fish Consumption (NHANES 1999–2004). Environmental Health Perspectives. doi:10.1289/ehp.11674. [Online 25 August 2008].

  14. MapInfo Professional. (2006). MapInfo Corporation. NY, USA: Troy.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McKelvey, W., Gwynn, R. C., Jeffrey, N., et al. (2007). A biomonitoring study of lead, cadmium, and mercury in the blood of New York city adults. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115, 1435–1441.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mc Kelvey, W., Jeffrey, N., Clark, N., et al. (2011). Population-based inorganic mercury biomonitoring and the identification of skin care products as a source of exposure in New York city. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119(2), 203–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. National Academy of Sciences. (2000). Toxicological effects of methylmercury. Washington, DC. Available: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309071402.

  18. New York State. (1980). Official Compilation of the Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York, Title 10 (Health), Chapter I (State Sanitary Code), Part 22 (Environmental Diseases), Section 22.6 Reporting of Heavy Metals in Blood and Urine and Section 22.7 Reportable Levels of Heavy Metals in Blood and Urine.

  19. New York State Department of Health. (2011). Health Advice on Eating Sportfish and Game; 2011–2012. [revised September 2011; cited January 2012]. Available from: http://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/outdoors/fish/health_advisories/docs/advisory_booklet_2011.pdf.

  20. New York State Department of Health (2011). Understanding Mercury Exposure Levels. [revised February 2011; cited September 2012]. Available from: http://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/chemicals/hsees/mercury/mercury_exposure_levels.htm.

  21. SAS Institute, Inc. (2002–2003). Cary, NC, USA.

  22. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census 2000 Summary File, Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: Geographic Area: New York.

  23. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census of Population and Housing, Summary File 3-New York.

  24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1997). Mercury Study Report to Congress. Publication EPA-452/R-97-003. Washington, DC. Available: http://www.epa.gov/mercury/report.htm [updated August 2007; cited April 2008].

  25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001). Integrated Risk Information System. Methylmercury (MeHg) (CASRN 22967-92-6). Available from: http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0073.htm [updated January 2008; cited October 2008].

  26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2002). Task Force on Ritualistic Uses of Mercury Report. OSWER 9285.4-07. EPA/540-R-01-005. Washington, DC 20460. Available: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/community/pdfs/mercury.pdf [updated December 2002; cited October 2012].

  27. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (1995). Mercury in Fish: Cause for Concern? Rockville, MD. Available: http://www.fda.gov/fdac/reprints/mercury.html (updated April 1999; cited April 2007).

  28. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Mercury levels in commercial fish and shellfish. Rockville, MD. Available: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~frf/sea-mehg.html (updated May 2006; cited April 2007).

  29. Williamson, D. M., Choury, E., Hildson, R., et al. (2004). Improving data quality in community-based seafood consumption studies by use of two measurements tools. Journal of Environmental Health, 67.3 (Oct 2004): p9(5).

  30. Wong, S. L., Lye, E. J. D. (2008). Lead, mercury and cadmium levels in Canadians. Statistics Canada, Catalougue no. 82-003-XPE. Health Reports, Vol 19, no.4.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia M. Fletcher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fletcher, A.M., Gelberg, K.H. An Analysis of Mercury Exposures Among the Adult Population in New York State. J Community Health 38, 529–537 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-012-9646-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-012-9646-9

Keywords

Navigation