Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gambling Attitudes and Beliefs Predict Attentional Bias in Non-problem Gamblers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Problem gambling has been identified as a public health concern in Australia, and a considerable proportion of regular gamblers may be at risk of developing gambling related problems. Attentional bias to salient cues has been observed in substance addictions, and to some extent, in problem gamblers. This bias appears to be indicative of an increase in sensitisation to salient cues as a result of continued reforcement of a related behaviour. To test for an attentional bias to gambling-related stimuli in non-problem gamblers, the relationships between gambling frequency, gambling attitudes and beliefs (GABS-23), and attentional bias were investigated. Participants (N = 38) viewed simultaneous pairs of gambling-related and neutral images and performed a dot probe task, during which their eye-movements were recorded. This enabled both direct and indirect measures of attentional bias to be obtained. Gambling frequency and GABS-23 scores predicted both direct and indirect measures of a bias in the maintenance of attention to gambling cues. No bias in attentional engagement was found. These results suggest that regular gamblers who have not yet developed any related problems show signs of sensitisation to gambling cues and may be at risk of progressing further towards problem gambling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, M. W., & Clarke, D. (2007). Prospective problem gambling research: Contribution and potential. International Gambling Studies, 7(1), 123–144. doi:10.1080/14459790701261714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bouju, G., Hardouin, J.-B., Boutin, C., Gorwood, P., Bourvellec, J.-D. L., Feuillet, F., et al. (2013). A shorter and multidimensional version of the Gambling Attitudes and Beliefs Survey (GABS-23). Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10899-012-9356-3.

  • Breen, R. B., & Zuckerman, M. (1999). `Chasing’ in gambling behavior: Personality and cognitive determinants. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1097–1111. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00052-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brevers, D., Cleeremans, A., Bechara, A., Laloyaux, C., Kornreich, C., Verbanck, P., et al. (2011). Time course of attentional bias for gambling information in problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 675–682. doi:10.1037/a0024201.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos, E. H., Charboneau, E., Dietrich, M. S., Park, S., Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., et al. (2009). Obese adults have visual attention bias for food cue images: evidence for altered reward system function. International Journal of Obesity, 33(9), 1063–1073. doi:10.1038/ijo.2009.138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. J., Macleod, C., & Guastella, A. J. (2013). Assessing the role of spatial engagement and disengagement of attention in anxiety-linked attentional bias: A critique of current paradigms and suggestions for future research directions. Anxiety Stress Coping, 26(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/10615806.2011.638054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, M., McMillen, J., Hallebone, E., Volberg, R., & Woolley, R. (1997). Definition and incidence of problem gambling, including the socio-economic distribution of problem gamblers. Melbourne: Victorian Casino and Gaming Authority. ISBN 9780731108299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse (submitted).

  • Field, M., & Cox, W. M. (2008). Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 97(1–2), 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field, M., Munafò, M. R., & Franken, I. H. A. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 589–607. doi:10.1037/a0015843.

  • Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681–700. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.681.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hing, N., & Nisbet, S. (2010). A qualitative perspective on physical, social and cognitive accessibility to gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues 101–120. doi: 10.4309/jgi.2010.24.7.

  • Holtgraves, T. (2009). Evaluating the Problem Gambling Severity Index. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(1), 105–120. doi:10.1007/s10899-008-9107-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hønsi, A., Mentzoni, R. A., Molde, H., & Pallesen, S. (2013). Attentional bias in problem gambling: A systematic review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29, 359–375. doi:10.1007/s10899-012-9315-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E., & Cox, W. M. (2004). Motivation and the theory of current concern. In W. M. Cox & E. Klinger (Eds.), Handbook of motivational counseling: Concepts, approaches, and assessment (pp. 3–27). West Sussex: Wiley.

  • Korn, D., Gibbins, R., & Azmier, J. (2003). Framing public policy towards a public health paradigm for gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 235–256. doi:10.1023/A:1023685416816. http://link.springer.com/article.

  • Lyk-Jensen, S. V. (2010). New evidence from the grey area: Danish results for at-risk gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 455–467. doi:10.1007/s10899-009-9173-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Messerlian, C., & Derevensky, J. L. (2005).Youth gambling: A public health perspective. Journal of Gambling Issues, 14. doi: 10.4309/jgi.2005.14.9.

  • Molde, H., Pallesen, S., Sætrevik, B., Hammerborg, D. K., Laberg, J. C., & Johnsen, B.-H. (2010). Attentional biases among pathological gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 10(1), 45–59. doi:10.1080/14459791003652501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2001). Volitional degrees of gambling behaviors. Annals of Tourism Research, 28, 618–637. doi:10.1016/S0160-7383(00)00066-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, D., & Brown, J. (2002). Pathological gambling. Identification and treatment. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 40(3), 22–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potenza, M. N. (2008). The neurobiology of pathological gambling and drug addiction: An overview and new findings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3181–3189. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2010). Australia’s Gambling Industries (vol 1). Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. doi:10.1007/s11469-013-9432-7.

  • Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2001). Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction, 96(1), 103–114. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.9611038.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2008). The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: Some current issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3137–3146. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H., & Korn, D. (2002). Gambling and related mental disorders: A public health analysis. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 171–212. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D. R., Breen, R. B., & Lejuez, C. W. (2004). Using item response theory to examine gambling attitudes and beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1515–1529. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1595–1608. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1595.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S., Lewis, S., Duong, J., & McLeod, C. (2012a). Sports betting marketing during sporting events: A stadium and broadcast census of Australian Football League matches. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 36, 145–152. doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00856.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. L., Lewis, S., McLeod, C., & Haycock, J. (2012b). ‘They are working every angle’. A qualitative study of Australian adults’ attitudes towards, and interactions with, gambling industry marketing strategies. International Gambling Studies, 12, 111–127. doi:10.1080/14459795.2011.639381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. L., Lewis, S., Westberg, K., & Derevensky, J. (2013). What influences the beliefs, behaviours and consumption patterns of ‘moderate risk’ gamblers? International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11, 474–489. doi:10.1007/s11469-013-9432-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vizcaino, E. J. V., Fernandez-Navarro, P., Blanco, C., Ponce, G., Navio, M., Moratti, S., et al. (2013). Maintenance of attention and pathological gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(3), 861–867. doi:10.1037/a0032656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, H. (2003). Introducing the Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Edmonton, AB: Wynne Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, S., & Kanetkar, V. (2010). Implicit measures of attitudes toward gambling: An exploratory study. Journal of Gambling Issues 140–163. doi: 10.4309/jgi.2010.24.9.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, NSW, 2450, Australia

    Leigh D. Grant & Alison C. Bowling

Authors
  1. Leigh D. Grant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alison C. Bowling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison C. Bowling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grant, L.D., Bowling, A.C. Gambling Attitudes and Beliefs Predict Attentional Bias in Non-problem Gamblers. J Gambl Stud 31, 1487–1503 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9468-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9468-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation