Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Heuristic and Analytic Processing in Online Sports Betting

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the results of two studies that examine the occurrence of heuristic (i.e., intuitive and fast) and analytic (i.e., deliberate and slow) processes among people who engage in online sports betting on a regular basis. The first study was qualitative and was conducted with a convenience sample of 12 regular online sports gamblers who described the processes by which they arrive at a sports betting decision. The results of this study showed that betting online on sports events involves a mix of heuristic and analytic processes. The second study consisted in a survey of 161 online sports gamblers where performance in terms of monetary gains, experience in online sports betting, propensity to collect and analyze relevant information prior to betting, and use of bookmaker odds were measured. This study showed that heuristic and analytic processes act as mediators of the relationship between experience and performance. The findings stemming of these two studies give some insights into gamblers’ modes of thinking and behaviors in an online sports betting context and show the value of the dual mediation process model for research that looks at gambling activities from a judgment and decision making perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allcock, C. (1985). How to gamble in the eighties. In J. McMillen (Ed.), Proceedings of the inaugural conference of the national association for gambling studies (pp. 240–246). Retrieved from http://www.nags.org.au/pdf/Proceedings%2085.pdf.

  • Andersson, P., Edman, J., & Ekman, M. (2005). Predicting in the World Cup 2002 in soccer: Performance and confidence of experts and non-experts. International Journal of Forecasting, 21, 565–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARJEL (Autorité de régulation des jeux en ligne). (2012). Statistics retrieved from www.arjel.fr/.

  • Ashman, T., Bowman, A. R., & Lambrinos, J. (2010). The role of fatigue in NBA wagering markets: The surprising home disadvantage situation. Journal of Sports Economics, 11, 602–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulier, B. L. K., & Stekler, H. O. (1999). Are sports seedings good predictors? An evaluation. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantinotti, M., Ladouceur, R., & Jacques, C. (2004). Sports betting: Can gamblers beat randomness? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 143–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. S., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Decision research: A field guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chantal, Y., & Vallerand, R. J. (1996). Skill versus luck: A motivational analysis of gambling involvement. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 407–418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daries, E., & Maufras, J. (2011). Gagner aux paris sportifs. Paris: Eyrolles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005–1007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, W. R., Madden, T. J., Kirmani, A., & Mukherjee, S. (2001). Understanding what’s in a brand rating: A model for assessing brand and attribute effects and their relationship to brand equity. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 415–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entine, O. A., & Small, D. S. (2008). The role of rest in the NBA home-court advantage. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 4, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, D., & Simmons, R. (2000). Forecasting sport: The behaviour and performance of football tipsters. International Journal of Forecasting, 16, 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T. (1983). Biaised evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1110–1126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., & Griffin, D. (2010). Judgment and decision making. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 542–588). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M., Babin, B. J., & Attaway, J. (1996). Anticipation of injurious consumption outcomes and its impact on consumer attributions of blame. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 314–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1994). The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henslin, J. M. (1967). Craps and magic. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 316–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute Substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Giroux, I., & Jacques, C. (1998). Winning on the horses: How much strategy and knowledge are needed? Journal of Psychology, 132, 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Rosenthal, R. J. (1991). Pathological gambling: A review of the literature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 7, 5–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Online Casino City. (2012). Statistics retrieved from http://online.casinocity.com/.

  • Paul, R. J., & Weinbach, A. P. (2002). Market efficiency and NCAA College basketball gambling. Journal of Economics and Finance, 29, 403–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. J., Weinbach, A. P., & Weinbach, C. J. (2003). Fair bets and profitability in college football gambling. Journal of Economics and Finance, 27, 236–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavée, F. (2010). Paris sportifs en ligne: Mode d’emploi. France: RMC Sports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyna, V. F. (2004). How people make decisions that involve risk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, T., & Macaskill, A. (2004). Differentiating normal and problem gambling: A grounded theory approach. Addiction Research and Theory, 12, 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosecrance, J. (1986). You can’t tell the players without a scorecard: A typology of horse players. Deviant Behavior, 7, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (1982). The winning way to successful punting. Sydney: Puntwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 379–396). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. T., & Brucks, M. (1997). The moderating effects of problem characteristics on experts’ and novices’ judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulemonde, Q. (2011). Paris sportifs en ligne: Comprendre—jouer—gagner. France: Amphora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergin, R. C., & Sosik, J. J. (1999). No place like home: An examination of the home field advantage in gambling strategies in NFL football. Journal of Economics and Business, 51, 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W. (1988). Paradoxes of gambling behaviour. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., & Wood, R. T. (2007). Internet gambling: A comprehensive review and synthesis of the literature. Guelph: Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemba, W. T., & Hausch, D. B. (1984). Beat the racetrack. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. HEC Montréal, 3000, Chemin de la Côte-Sainte Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 2A7, Canada

    Alain d’Astous

  2. Loto Québec, 500, Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H3A 3G6, Canada

    Marc Di Gaspero

Authors
  1. Alain d’Astous
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marc Di Gaspero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain d’Astous.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

d’Astous, A., Di Gaspero, M. Heuristic and Analytic Processing in Online Sports Betting. J Gambl Stud 31, 455–470 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9438-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9438-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation