Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Near Miss, Gambler’s Fallacy and Entrapment: Their Influence on Lottery Gamblers in Thailand

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Near miss, gambler’s fallacy and entrapment are hypothesized to influence gambling behavior but their individual impact on gambling behavior and their relationships have not been investigated. This study examines the direct and mediated effects of near miss, gambler’s fallacy and entrapment on lottery gambling among Thai lottery gamblers. Two groups of 200 lottery gamblers participated in the study. One group used superstitious methods to search for lottery numbers to bet, whereas the other group simply bought their tickets from lottery stalls. The superstitious group shows higher levels of near miss, gambler’s fallacy, entrapment and lottery gambling. Three models of relationships among near miss, gambler’s fallacy, entrapment and lottery gambling were constructed using LISREL program. The model that shows a direct effect of near miss, and one that shows a mediated effect of near miss fit the data equally. The results confirm a gambler’s fallacy and entrapment as starting points in the theory of cognitive psychology of lottery gambling and the generalization of near miss in gambling motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ariyabuddhiphongs, V., & Chanchalermporn, N. (2007). A test of social cognitive theory reciprocal and sequential effects: Hope, superstitious belief and environmental factors among lottery gamblers in Thailand. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(2), 201–214. doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9035-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ariyabuddhiphongs, V., Chanchalermporn, N., & Phengpol, V. (2007). Adapting the DSM-IV and SOGS scales to measure gambling problems among two groups of Thai lottery gamblers. Unpublished technical report, The Graduate School, Bangkok University.

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. D., & Corpus, B. (2004). Randomness and inductions from streaks: “Gambler’s fallacy” versus “hot hand”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cote, D., Caron, A., Aubert, J., Desrochers, V., & Ladouceur, R. (2003). Near wins prolong gambling on a video lottery terminal. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(4), 433–438. doi:10.1023/A:1026384011003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., & Sundali, J. (2005). The gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from casinos. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30(3), 195–209. doi:10.1007/s11166-005-1153-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., & Schreiber, J. E. (2004). Near-miss effects on response latencies and win estimations of slot machine players. The Psychological Record, 54, 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., & Wood, R. (2001). The psychology of lottery gambling. International Gambling Studies, 1, 27–45. doi:10.1080/14459800108732286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, V. M., Meerkerk, G.-J., Van Oers, H. A. M., & Garretsen, H. F. L. (1997). The Dutch instant lottery Prevalence and correlates of at risk playing. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 92, 335–347. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb03203.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: SSI Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameda, T., & Sugimori, S. (1993). Psychological entrapment in group decision making: An assigned decision rule and a groupthink phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 282–292. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klem, L. (2000). Structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 227–260). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in application of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 185–199. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McConkey, C. W., & Warren, W. E. (1987). Psychographic and demographic profiles of state lottery ticket purchases. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 21, 314–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. S., & Monk, A. (1999). The effects of individual differences and anonymity on commitment to decisions: Preliminary evidence. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(4), 496–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R. L. (1986). The psychology of the near miss. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2(1), 32–39. doi:10.1007/BF01019932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(2), 111–134. doi:10.1023/A:1023042708217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P., & Webley, P. (2001). “It could be us!”: Cognitive and social psychological factors in UK national lottery play. Applied Psychology: International Review (Steubenville, Ohio), 50(1), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, S. E., & Goltz, S. (2001). Comparison of allocations by individuals and interacting groups in an escalation of commitment situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 134–156. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02486.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chose course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27–44. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thames, E. A. (1996). The sunk-cost effect: The importance of context. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11(4), 817–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, M. J. A., & Enzle, M. E. (2003). The effects of near wins and near losses on self-perceived personal luck and subsequent gambling behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 184–191. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00525-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Graduate School, Bangkok University, Rama 4 Road, Klongtoey, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand

    Vanchai Ariyabuddhiphongs & Varich Phengphol

Authors
  1. Vanchai Ariyabuddhiphongs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Varich Phengphol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanchai Ariyabuddhiphongs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ariyabuddhiphongs, V., Phengphol, V. Near Miss, Gambler’s Fallacy and Entrapment: Their Influence on Lottery Gamblers in Thailand. J Gambl Stud 24, 295–305 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-008-9098-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-008-9098-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation