Skip to main content
Log in

Reflections on Accuracy

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The difference between test accuracy and predictive accuracy is presented and defined. The failure to distinguish between these two types of measures is shown to have led to a misguided debate over the interpretation of prevalence estimates. The distinction between test accuracy defined as sensitivity and specificity, and predictive accuracy defined as positive and negative predictive value is shown to reflect the choice of the denominator used to calculate true positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative rates. It is further shown that any instrument will tend to overestimate prevalence in low base rate populations and underestimate it in those populations where prevalence is high. The implications of these observations are then discussed in terms of the need to define diagnostic thresholds that have clinical and policy relevance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, M., & Volberg, R. (1996). The New Zealand national survey of problem and pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramson J. H. (1996). Cross-sectional studies. In W. W. Holland, R. Detals, & G. Knox (Eds.), Methods in public health (pp. 517–535). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, H., & Gefeller, O. (1997). Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. Statistics in Medicine, 16, 981–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culleton, R. P. (1989). The prevalence rates of pathological gambling: A look at methods. Journal of Gambling Behaviors, 5, 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derevensky, J. L., Gupta, R., & Winters, K. (2003). Prevalence rates of youth gambling problems: Are the current rates inflated? Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, M. (1993). A preliminary exploration of a two-stage methodology in the assessment of the extent and degree of gambling related problems in the Australian population. In W. R. Eadington, J. Cornelius, & J. I. Tabor (Eds.), Gambling behavior and problem gambling (pp. 347–363). Reno, Nevada: Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, University of Nevada, Reno.

  • Dickerson, M. G., Baron, E., Hong, S. M., & Cottrell, D. (1996). Estimating the extent and degree of gambling related problems in the Australian population: A national survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elandt-Johnson, R. C. (1975). Definition of rates: Some remarks on their use and misuse. American Journal of Epidemiology, 102, 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambino, B. (1997a). The correction for bias in prevalence estimation with screening tests. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambino, B. (1997b). Method, Method: Who’s got the method? What can we KNOW about the number of compulsive gamblers? Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambino, B. (2005). Interpreting prevalence estimates of pathological gambling: Implications for policy. Journal of Gambling Issues, 16, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, E. S., Eaton, W. W., & Zeger, S. (2002). Methods for evaluating the performance of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard: A latent class model approach. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1289–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. M., & Simpson, J. C. (1995). Validity: Definitions and applications to psychiatric research. In M. T. Tsuang, M. Tohen, & G. E. P. Zahner (Eds.), Textbook in Psychiatric Epidemiology (pp. 229–242). New York: Wiley-Liss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C. (2002). Epidemiologic perspectives for the development of future diagnostic systems. Psychopathology, 35, 158–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, H. C. (1992). Evaluating medical tests: Objective and quantitative guidelines. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R. (1984). The chase: Career of the compulsive gambler. Cambridge, MA: Schenken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mausner, J. S., & Kramer, S. (1985). Epidemiology: An Introductory Text. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, O. (1985). Theoretical epidemiology. Boston: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington D.C: National Academy Press.

  • Reid, M. C., Lachs, M. S., & Feinstein, A. R. (1995). Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Journal of American Medical Association, 274, 645–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L. N. (1985). Epidemiology: Reflections on testing the validity of psychiatric interviews. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 918–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. L., Haynes, R. B, Guyatt, G. H., & Tugwell, P. (1991). Clinical epidemiology: A basic science for clinical medicine (2nd ed.). Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. H., & Vanderbilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1369–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., & Korn, D. A. (2002). Gambling and related mental disorders: A public health analysis. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 171–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchfield, R., Govoni, R., & Frisch, G. R. (2001). An evaluation of diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. (November), Final Report, University of Windsor.

  • Streiner, D. L. (2003). Diagnosing tests: Using and misusing diagnostic and screening tests. Journal of Personality Tests, 81, 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taragin, M. I., Wildman, D., & Trout, R. (1994). Assessing disease prevalence from inaccurate test results: Teaching an old dog new tricks. Medical Decision Making, 14, 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremayne, K., Masterman-Smith, H., & McMillen, J. (2001). Survey of the nature and extent of gambling and problem gambling in the ACT. Australian Institute for Gambling Research, University of Western Sydney.

  • Volberg, R., & Steadman, H. J. (1989). Policy implications of prevalence estimates of pathological gambling. In H. J. Shaffer, S. A. Stein, B. Gambino, & T. N. Cummings (Eds.), Compulsive gambling: Theory, research and practice (pp. 163–174). Boston: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., & Banks, S. M. (1990). A review of two measures of pathological gambling in the United States. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A. (1996). Gambling and problem gambling in New York: A 10-year replication survey, 1986–1996. Report to the New York Council on Problem Gambling.

  • Volberg, R. A. (1999). Research methods in the epidemiology of pathological gambling: Development of the field and directions for the future. Anuario de Psicologa, 30, 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H., & Braun, H. I. (1988). Test validity. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEFA Group, ICR Survey Research Group, Lesieur, H., & Thompson, W. (1997). A study concerning the effects of legalized gambling on the citizens of the State of Connecticut. State of Connecticut Department of Revenue Services, Division of Special Revenue.

  • Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M, & Parker J. (2002). Gambling participation in the U.S. Results from a national survey. Journal of Gambling. Studies, 18. 313–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmy, J. (1947). Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis, with special reference to X-ray techniques. Public Health Reports, 62, 1432–1449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X. H., Obuchowski, N. A., & McClish, D. K. (2002). Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blasé Gambino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gambino, B. Reflections on Accuracy. J Gambl Stud 22, 393–404 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-006-9025-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-006-9025-5

Keywords

Navigation